Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Ottawa, Ontario, K1H8L1, Canada
NCT Number: NCT02584530
This is a randomized controlled study comparing US guided vs standard procedure for PICC line placement in newborns admitted to Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Neonatal Intensive Care Unit who require a PICC line. Patients will be randomized using REDCap randomization module (stratified by gestational age < 28 weeks and >= 28 weeks and blocked to ensure approximate balance with each stratum) into two arms. - Arm 1: PICC line insertion procedure using anatomical landmarks and tip placement will be confirmed by X-ray (current standard); Arm 2: US guided PICC line insertion procedure and tip placement confirmation by both US and X-ray. Sample size of 33 infants per group would achieve greater than 80% power to detect a difference between groups.
Primary outcome: Time to complete the standard versus the US-guided procedure.
Secondary outcomes (comparison between two arms):
The number of total "venipuncture" attempts needed to place a PICC line Number of tip manipulations after complete insertion Proportion of successful tip placement
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me1 day–28 day
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Ottawa, Ontario, K1H8L1, Canada
Background Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) line placement is one of the most commonly performed procedures in Neonatology. Due to prematurity and small vein size, the procedure often requires multiple attempts over an increased timeframe. As a standard of care, the position is confirmed by X-ray. Frequently, catheters are not optimally positioned, necessitating repositioning and further radiographs.
The use of ultrasound (US) guidance for PICC line placement enhances the visualization of the veins and provides a better selection for optimal access. It could decrease or even eliminate the need for X-rays when used to confirm the tip position.
Objectives To demonstrate that using US-guidance to place and confirm tip positioning for PICC line insertion in neonates will decrease the number of cannulation attempts, will shorten the time needed to complete the procedure, and will decrease infants' exposure to radiation.
Methods This is a randomized controlled study comparing US guided vs standard procedure for PICC line placement in newborns admitted to CHEO NICU who require a PICC line (approximately 130-150 infants per year). Patients will be randomized using REDCap randomization module (stratified by gestational age < 28 weeks and >= 28 weeks and blocked to ensure approximate balance with each stratum) into two arms - Arm 1: PICC line insertion procedure using anatomical landmarks and tip placement will be confirmed by X-ray (current standard); Arm 2: US guided PICC line insertion procedure and tip placement confirmation by both US and X-ray. A sample size of 33 infants per group would be sufficient to achieve greater than 80% power to detect a difference between groups.
Results of this study may demonstrate that US guided PICC line placement is superior (shorter and safer procedure, reduced radiation and pain) to currently used procedure and could lead to practice change.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
All newborns (0-28 days) admitted to Neonatal Intensive Care Unit who require PICC line insertion after consent has been obtained to include in this study. Including:
Exclusion criteria
Apply ultrasound guidance for PICC line placement and positioning in newborns
Time frame: one year
Comparison between total time of procedure with standard approach vs US guidance measured in minutes.
Time frame: One year
Number of venipuncture attempts will be documented per patient through the whole duration of study and then both groups will be compared differences in number
Time frame: One year
Number of manipulations of tip line for adequate placement will be documented on each patient and then compared against control group to assess for differences in number.
Time frame: One year
Total number of correct position of PICC line tip will be documented in both groups and then compared to control.
Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Other
A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Ultrasound Guided PICC Line Insertion in Neonates With Standard Procedure
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06537388
High-Frequency Jet Ventilation, Intermittent Positive-pressure Ventilation
Brussels, Belgium
View Trial DetailsNCT03996733
Central Venous Catheters, Education
Karabağlar, İzmir, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT04317976
Ultrasonography, Interventional
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
View Trial DetailsNCT03518450
Anesthesia, Conduction, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
Barcelona, Spain
View Trial Details