Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Active, Not Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06739902

Comparing the Effectiveness of Traditional Physiotherapy Combined With Virtual Reality for Post-Stroke Patients

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of combining virtual reality (VR) therapy with traditional physiotherapy in post-stroke rehabilitation. Post-stroke patients often suffer from impairments in motor function, balance, and overall quality of life. While traditional physiotherapy is a widely accepted method for stroke recovery, incorporating VR technology may enhance treatment outcomes by providing an engaging, immersive environment that motivates patients to perform therapeutic movements.

Active, Not Recruiting

This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Stroke Brain Diseases Cardiovascular Diseases Central Nervous System Diseases Cerebrovascular Disorders Nervous System Diseases Vascular Diseases

Age range

18 year–75 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Services Hospital, Shadman 1

Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan

About this study

This study will compare the functional and quality-of-life improvements in patients undergoing traditional physiotherapy alone versus those receiving a combination of conventional physiotherapy and VR interventions. By assessing changes in motor function, trunk stability, balance, and quality of life, this research will provide valuable insights into whether VR can be an effective adjunctive tool in post-stroke rehabilitation programs.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Stroke, either ischemic or hemorrhagic
  • Participants who can ambulate independently or with minimal assistance.
  • Participants who were willing & able to adhere to the study protocol.
  • Including participants who were attending follow-up appointments & completing outcome measures.
  • Participants who were able to understand & provide written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Existence of additional neurological disorders (such as multiple sclerosis or Parkinson's disease) or serious medical conditions that could prevent participants from participating in the study.
  • Participants receiving rehabilitation or rigorous physical treatment in the previous three months were excluded.
  • Pregnant women or breastfeeding women.
  • Participants who refused to participate in the study or provide informed consent.

Treatment and study plan

Traditional Physiotherapy Group

Diagnostic Test

Participants receive standard physiotherapy exercises aimed at improving motor function, balance, and trunk stability. These exercises include stretching, balance training, and muscle-strengthening activities.

VR + Traditional Physiotherapy Group

Combination Product

Participants receive the same physiotherapy exercises as the traditional group, but with additional sessions involving virtual reality exercises. The VR component includes immersive activities that stimulate motor control, coordination, and cognitive engagement to support functional recovery.

Primary outcomes

  1. Berg Balance Scale (BBS)

    Time frame: 12 Months

    Assesses balance and stability.- *Purpose*: Assesses balance in older adults and individuals with balance disorders.

    • *Items*: 14 tasks, such as sitting, standing, reaching, and turning.
    • *Scoring*: Each task is scored on a scale of 0-4 (0 = inability to perform the task, 4 = normal performance).
    • *Total Score*: The maximum score is 56. Higher scores indicate better balance. A score below 45 indicates a higher risk of falling.

  2. Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS)

    Time frame: 12 Months

    Measures trunk control and stability. SF-12 Health Survey: Evaluates quality of life in physical and mental health domains.The *Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS)* is a clinical tool used to assess trunk performance in individuals, particularly those with neurological impairments like stroke. It measures three key aspects: *static sitting balance, **dynamic sitting balance, and **coordination of trunk movements. The scale consists of **17 items*, with scores ranging from 0 to 23. Higher scores indicate better trunk control and stability. It helps clinicians evaluate and track improvements in trunk function over time, guiding rehabilitation interventions.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Superior University

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2025
First posted
Dec 18, 2024
Registry last updated
Dec 18, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.