Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01883037

Comparing Laboratory Blood Glucose Results With HemoCue Glucose 201 RT

There are very few studies comparing the accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of HemoCue glucose 201 RT system with the laboratory gold standard.

The incidence of cystic fibrosis related diabetes (CFRD) has risen significantly as patients' survival improves. Around 30% of all cystic fibrosis (CF) adult patients have CFRD. Early diagnosis of CFRD is important to slow the deterioration of lung function and nutritional status, both of which increase mortality.

The oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) is the accepted method for detecting CFRD and the Cystic Fibrosis Trust guidelines recommend that patients with CF over the age of twelve years should be screened annually.

The World Health Organisation has pointed out that due to the absence of a more specific biological marker to define diabetes, plasma glucose estimation remains the basis of diagnostic criteria. WHO recommends that venous plasma glucose should be the standard method for measuring and reporting glucose concentration in blood. However, it has also recognised that there is a widespread use of capillary sampling. Although fasting values for venous and capillary plasma glucose are the same, in the nonfasting state capillary samples will give higher results than venous samples, and glucose values require conversion which can be problematic.

HemoCue Glucose 201 RT (HGS 201 RT) analyzer with plasma conversion provides laboratory quality test results at the point of care for the diagnosis, screening and monitoring of diabetes mellitus. The analyzer is easy to use and the system can be operated by nonlaboratory personnel, also the results can be presented immediately, leading to significant time and resource saving. The patient also benefits from having the result immediately instead of waiting for several hours. With immediate result, the doctor and health care professionals can provide education, support and reassurance, and implement care plans, if appropriate, at the earliest opportunity.

The aim of the study is to compare the clinical accuracy of HemoCue Glucose 201 RT with the laboratory standard method in the analysis of blood glucose concentration during oral glucose tolerance test.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

16 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Royal Brompton Hospital

London, SW3 6NP, United Kingdom

About this study

All CF patients attending annual review who require an OGTT will have a venous and a capillary blood sample taken simultaneously before (fasting = 0 min) and 2 hours (post glucose load = 120 min) after the administration of 75 grams Glucose solution orally.

The capillary sample will be analysed immediately using HGS 201 RT. The venous sample will be collected in a Fluoride Oxalate tube (WHO guideline) and sent to the Trust's laboratory for analysis as per usual practice.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

The first 70 consecutive suitable consenting adult CF patients, who are 16 years of age and over, attending annual review at the Royal Brompton Hospital from June 2013 to March 2014, are eligible for the study

Exclusion criteria

Patients with an existing diagnosis of CFRD are exclude.

Treatment and study plan

Blood glucose results

Other

The glucose value from the HemoCue Glucose 201 RT will be compared with the Trust Laboratory value.

Other names: HemoCue Glucose 201 RT

Primary outcomes

  1. Does HemoCue Glucose 201 RT provide lab-quality results in the analysis of glucose values during oral glucose tolerance tests?

    Time frame: One year

    The glucose value from the HemoCue Glucose 201 RT will be compared with the Trust Laboratory value. The sensitivity, specificity and clinical significance will be calculated.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Is HemoCue Glucose 201 RT method cost saving relative to the traditional laboratory method for analysing glucose values taken during oral glucose tolerance tests?

    Time frame: One year

    The cost of using the HemoCue Glucose 201 RT will be compared with Trust Laboratory cost for analysing the glucose value from OGTT.

Other outcomes

  1. 2. To see if the HemoCue Glucose 201 RT offers sufficient advantages to make it a viable alternative to conventional testing

    Time frame: One year

    If using HemoCue Glucose 201 RT is shown to offer cost and clinical advantages over conventional testing then look to implement as standard test method and report more widely.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust

Other

Registry information

Official study title

To Compare the Clinical Accuracy of Glucose Measurement During Oral Glucose Tolerance Test Using Two Methods: i) Laboratory Standard Technique, ii) HemoCue Glucose 201 RT System

Acronym: CFRD

Important dates

Study start
2013
Primary completion
2014
Study completion
2014
First posted
Jun 21, 2013
Registry last updated
Nov 13, 2014

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.