Part A First Wear Period: Traditional AFO(s)
DeviceParticipants are randomized to wear traditionally produced AFOs during Weeks 1 through 3.
NCT Number: NCT06828653
The research is being done to compare two methods of creating AFOs: 1. The traditional method, which involves manually creating a mold from a plaster cast of the client's limb. This is time-consuming and labor-intensive; and 2. The newer method uses digital technology, such as 3D scanning and printing, to design and produce the AFOs, potentially making the process faster and less costly. We want to know whether AFOs made using digital technology can provide the same clinical benefits as those made traditionally.
Interested in participating?
Request Info8 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Boundless Biomechanical Bracing, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
This study is designed to compare two methods of creating ankle-foot orthoses (AFOs), which are devices used to support the lower limbs in people with mobility impairments due to conditions like stroke or cerebral palsy. The traditional method involves manually creating a mold from a plaster cast of the patient's limb, which is time-consuming and labor-intensive. The new method uses digital technology, such as 3D scanning and printing, to design and produce the AFOs, potentially making the process faster and less costly.
The purpose of the study is to test whether AFOs made using digital technology can provide the same clinical benefits as those made traditionally, but with greater efficiency and at a lower cost. The research will gather data on patient satisfaction, the functionality of the AFOs, and the costs associated with each method. This will help determine if the digital method can be a viable alternative to traditional AFO production, potentially leading to better patient care and reduced healthcare costs.
The study poses the overarching research question: Can digitally produced ankle-foot orthoses (AFOs) achieve similar positive clinical outcomes to traditionally fabricated AFOs while being more efficient and cost-effective? The primary objective of this feasibility study is to inform the design of a larger randomized controlled trial (RCT) that will comprehensively address this question.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Participants are randomized to wear traditionally produced AFOs during Weeks 1 through 3.
Participants are randomized to wear digitally produced AFOs during Weeks 1 through 3.
Participants wear traditionally produced AFOs during Weeks 4 through 6.
Participants wear digitally produced AFOs during Weeks 4 through 6.
Participants are randomized to wear traditionally produced AFO(s) during Weeks 7 through 14.
Participants are randomized to wear digitally produced AFO(s) during Weeks 7 through 14.
Time frame: From the shape capture visit until the end of the study at week 14
Evaluates patient satisfaction related to assistive technology and services rendered. This questionnaire is commonly used in assessing performance of AFOs and other orthotic devices.
Time frame: From Week 1 until Week 6 of the study
Designed and validated to assess orthotic users' ability to perform activities related to movement, locomotion, and/or postural transitions.
Time frame: From Week 1 until Week 6 of the study
Assesses function, satisfaction, and quality of life of individuals using orthotic or prosthetic devices. Its Lower Extremity Functional Status component will be used since it pertains specifically to the individual's functional abilities and limitations.
Time frame: From the shape capture visit until the end of the study at Week 14
Timed walk test
Time frame: From the shape capture visit until the end of the study at Week 14
Time frame: From the shape capture appointment until the participant receives their devices at Week 1
Creating biomechanical (alignment/dynamic) goals that AFOs are designed to treat. Will be applied to both types of AFOs. Goal achievement rating will be based on a modification of the GAS 5-level rating system (levels -2 to 0 only) after AFO fitting is complete
Time frame: From the shape capture visit until the end of the study at Week 14
A new six-item measure that was created by the Holland Bloorview team for this study to capture any functionally important differences in balance linked with AFO type across a spectrum of client abilities.
Time frame: From the shape capture visit until the end of the crossover period at Week 6
Evaluate orthotists' satisfaction with the AFO fabrication and fitting process.
Time frame: From the shape capture visit until the end of the crossover period at Week 6
Designed and validated to assess orthotic users' ability to perform activities related to movement, locomotion, and/or postural transitions.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital
Other
Feasibility RCT Evaluating Digitally and Traditionally Produced Ankle Foot Orthoses for Individuals With Impaired Lower Limb Function
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07706517
Brain Damage, Chronic, Brain Diseases
Saint-Etienne, France
View Trial DetailsNCT00866112
Amputation, Arthritis
Lawrence, Kansas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06945835
Behavior, Brain Damage, Chronic
West Hartford, Connecticut, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03797378
Autoimmune Diseases, Autoimmune Diseases of the Nervous System
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial Details