Orthotics Department, Glasgow Royal Infirmary
Glasgow, G4 0SF, United Kingdom
NCT Number: NCT05444192
The main purpose of this study is to find out if scanning the foot using a 3D scanner influences the effectiveness of custom made insoles, compared to the more traditional approach of taking a foam-box impression cast of the foot. Both of these methods are currently used as standard care in the NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde (GGC) Orthotic Department. In this study, insoles will be manufactured either from a direct 3D scan of the foot, or from a foam-box impression cast, and a series of questionnaires will be used to measure any changes in foot pain and foot function. The results from this study will be used to develop an information resource for both patients and Orthotists which will fill gaps in our current knowledge and hopefully guide us further in providing the best possible care for future patients who require insoles.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Glasgow, G4 0SF, United Kingdom
A single centre, double blinded, randomised controlled trial. Interventional, equivalence Trial design.
Participants will be asked to attend 2 face-to-face appointments for assessing and fitting of insoles, which is standard practice in the NHS GGC Orthotic Department. Each face-to-face appointment will take approximately 40 minutes. Following the fitting of the insoles, participants will be asked to participate in 3 telephone calls over 12-weeks, during which they will be asked to answer questions from two questionnaires (the "Foot Health Status Questionnaire", and the "Orthotic and Prosthetic User Survey"). Each telephone appointment will take approximately 15 minutes. Once participants receive their insoles, they will also be asked to keep a diary detailing the number of hours that they wore the insoles each day over 12-weeks. This information will be collected by the Orthotist involved with the trial during the telephone review appointments.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
computer-aided-design computer-aided-manufacture (CAD/CAM) insoles
Time frame: Measured 4 times throughout the 12-week period that the participant is wearing the insoles: Baseline immediately after receiving intervention (insoles). 4 weeks after intervention. 8 weeks after intervention. And 12 weeks after intervention
To compare the changes in pain in two groups of participants fitted with custom CAD/CAM insoles manufactured using different foot shape capture methods. Units on a scale. Minimum score is 0, maximum score is 100. Higher scores represent better outcomes.
Time frame: Measured 4 times throughout the 12-week period that the participant is wearing the insoles: Baseline immediately after receiving intervention (insoles). 4 weeks after intervention. 8 weeks after intervention. And 12 weeks after intervention
To compare the changes in foot function in two groups of participants fitted with custom CAD/CAM insoles manufactured using different foot shape capture methods. Units on a scale. Minimum score is 0, maximum score is 100. Higher scores represent better outcomes.
Time frame: Measured 4 times throughout the 12-week period that the participant is wearing the insoles: Baseline immediately after receiving intervention (insoles). 4 weeks after intervention. 8 weeks after intervention. And 12 weeks after intervention
To compare the changes in foot health in two groups of participants fitted with custom CAD/CAM insoles manufactured using different foot shape capture methods. Units on a scale. Minimum score is 0, maximum score is 100. Higher scores represent better outcomes.
Time frame: Measured 12 weeks after being fitted with insoles
To compare the patient satisfaction in two groups of participants fitted with custom CAD/CAM insoles manufactured using different foot shape capture methods. Units on a scale. Minimum score is 0, maximum score is 100. Higher scores represent better outcomes.
Time frame: Costs were calculated per participant from baseline until their completion of the trial at week 12.
A differential cost analysis was undertaken. This involved calculating the total cost for each participant using a calculation of transit costs, staff time, and physical resources for each participant throughout their time in the trial.
Time frame: Measured from baseline until completion of the trial at week 12
Patients will keep a diary of daily wear time in hours, in accordance with prior publications on measuring Orthotic Adherence. The minimum threshold for adherence is >21 hours per week
Time frame: Measured from baseline to completion of the trial at 12 weeks, for each participant
Dropout rate = n dropout at end of trial
NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde
Other
Comparing the Effectiveness of Computer-aided-design Computer-aided-manufacture (CAD/CAM) Insoles Manufactured From Foam-box Cast vs Direct Scan on Patient Reported Outcome Measures: A Double-blinded, Randomised Controlled Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05555459
Ankle Fractures, Ankle Injuries
Tampere, Finland
View Trial DetailsNCT06242002
Foot Injuries, Foot Injury
Amiens, France
View Trial DetailsNCT06086418
Ankle Disease, Ankle Injuries
Poznan, Poznań, Poland
View Trial DetailsNCT06300671
Balance Disorders, Foot Injuries
Beşiktaş, Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details