Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00096785

Comparative Trial of Entecavir Versus Adefovir in the Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B Infection

The purpose of this study is to evaluate antiviral activity and efficacy of entecavir (ETV) compared to adefovir in adults with chronic hepatitis B who have not been treated yet with an antiviral medicine.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

16 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Local Institution, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Chronic hepatitis B treatment naive
  • Compensated liver disease

Treatment and study plan

Entecavir

Drug

Tablets, Oral, ETV 0.5 mg, once daily, up to 96 weeks

Other names: Baraclude

Adefovir

Drug

Tablets, Oral, ADV 10 mg, once daily, up to 96 weeks

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Hepatitis B Virus DNA (HBV DNA) by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) Assay at Week 12

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

    Antiviral efficacy, as measured by the mean reduction in serum HBV DNA levels by PCR (log10 copies/mL) at Week 12, adjusted for baseline (Week 12 - baseline). A negative value = improvement.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in HBV DNA by PCR Assay at Week 48

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 48

    Antiviral efficacy, as measured by the mean reduction in serum HBV DNA levels by PCR (log10 copies/mL) at Week 48, adjusted for baseline (Week 48 - Baseline). A negative value = improvement.

  2. Viral Load Undetectable (HBV DNA <300 Copies/mL)

    Time frame: Week 48

    Number of Subjects with HBV DNA <300 copies/mL by Roche COBAS® Amplicor (limit of quantitation 300 copies/mL)

  3. Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Normalization

    Time frame: Week 48

    Number of participants with ALT ≤ 1 x upper limit of normal (ULN)

  4. HBV DNA Viral Kinetics Estimates of Exponential Decay Model - Efficacy in Blocking Virus Production and de Novo Infections

    Time frame: Week 12

    The biphasic decline of HBV DNA is characterized via a 4-parameter exponential decay model previously published for HBV compounds. The model parameters of interest are the effectiveness of the drug in blocking virus production from infected cells (efficacy, ε) and effectiveness of the study treatment in blocking de novo infection of susceptible cells (η). The model parameters reflect the biphasic pattern that is typically observed after initiation of antiviral therapy. Parameters were estimated for each subject separately and then averaged within each treatment group.

  5. HBV DNA Viral Kinetics Estimates of Exponential Decay Model - Viral Clearance Rate and Infected Cell Death Rate

    Time frame: Week 12

    The biphasic decline of HBV DNA is characterized via a 4-parameter exponential decay model previously published for HBV compounds. The model parameters of interest are the clearance rate of the free virus (c), the death rate of productively infected cells (δ), The model parameters reflect the biphasic pattern that is typically observed after initiation of antiviral therapy. Parameters were estimated for each subject separately and then averaged within each treatment group.

  6. HBV DNA Viral Kinetics Estimates of Exponential Decay Model - Half-Life of Free Virus

    Time frame: Week 12

    The biphasic decline of HBV DNA is characterized via a 4-parameter exponential decay model previously published for HBV compounds. An important derived parameter is the half-life of free virus (ie, the average amount of time for HBV particles in plasma to be reduced to half the initial level), calculated as 24*ln(2)/c. The model parameters reflect the biphasic pattern that is typically observed after initiation of antiviral therapy. Parameters were estimated for each subject separately and then averaged within each treatment group.

  7. HBV DNA Viral Kinetics - Spline Model

    Time frame: Week 12

    This analysis uses a 3-parameter piece-wise linear model and describes the biphasic decline in HBV DNA (measured by PCR assay) through Week 12. The 3 parameters are the values for the 2 slopes, describing the first and second phase declines, respectively, and the estimated HBV DNA at the knot (at day 10; the time point where the 2 phases join). The biphasic viral decay kinetics for each treatment were obtained using a spline fitting procedure to estimate the 3 parameters for each subject; these estimates were then averaged within each treatment group.

  8. Summary of Safety - Most Frequent (> 10%) Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Discontinuations Due to AEs, and Deaths

    Time frame: cumulative through the end of on-treatment observation as available at the time of the Week 48 dataset

    AE=new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of pre-existing medical condition regardless of causal relationship to treatment. SAE=untoward medical occurrence that is life-threatening, a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or an important medical event, or results in death, inpatient hospitalization/prolongation of hospitalization, or persistent/significant disability. AE grades: mild (1), moderate (2), severe (3), life-threatening (4), death (5). ALT flare= >2x baseline & >10x ULN up to end of therapy + 5 days. Hepatic SAE=SAEs consistent with worsening of hepatitis or hepatic decompensation.

  9. Summary of Safety - Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Clinical AEs

    Time frame: Week 48

    Laboratory abnormalities reported as clinical AEs

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Bristol-Myers Squibb

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

Randomized, Open-Label, Comparative Study to Evaluate Early Viral Load Reductions and Exploratory Viral Kinetics Following Administration of Entecavir or Adefovir in Nucleoside-Naive Adults With Chronic Hepatitis B Infection

Important dates

Study start
2004
Primary completion
2006
Study completion
2008
First posted
Nov 16, 2004
Registry last updated
Aug 10, 2010

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.