Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07624877

Comparative Evaluation of Intraneuroma and Perineuroma Botulinum Toxin Type A Injection Techniques for Chronic Neuroma Pain After Combat-Related Amputation

Patients with combat-related amputations frequently experience chronic neuroma pain that may interfere with rehabilitation, prosthesis use, mobility, sleep, and quality of life. Ultrasound-guided botulinum toxin type A injection has emerged as a potential treatment option for persistent neuroma pain; however, the optimal injection technique remains unclear.

This prospective multicenter study aims to compare two ultrasound-guided botulinum toxin injection techniques for chronic neuroma pain after combat-related amputation: intraneuroma injection and perineuroma injection.

Participants with ultrasound-confirmed painful neuromas will undergo one of the two injection approaches based on the treating physician's clinical decision and local practice. Pain intensity, neuropathic pain characteristics, phantom limb pain, prosthesis tolerance, functional outcomes, and adverse events will be evaluated during follow-up.

The goal of the study is to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and potential clinical effectiveness of intraneuroma and perineuroma botulinum toxin type A injection techniques in patients with chronic neuroma pain following combat-related amputation.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

18 year–60 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Vinnitsya university hospital, Vinnytsia, Вінницька, Ukraine

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Chronic neuroma pain is a common and disabling complication following combat-related limb trauma and amputation. Persistent neuroma pain may contribute to residual limb pain, phantom limb pain, impaired prosthesis tolerance, reduced mobility, sleep disturbance, and decreased quality of life. Ultrasound-guided botulinum toxin type A injection has emerged as a promising treatment option because of its potential effects on peripheral nociceptive signaling, neurogenic inflammation, and neuropathic pain modulation.

However, the optimal injection technique for botulinum toxin administration in painful neuromas remains unclear. Two commonly used approaches include direct intraneuroma injection and perineuroma injection surrounding the neuroma. Intraneuroma injection may provide more direct pharmacological modulation of pathological nerve tissue, whereas perineuroma injection may reduce the risk of mechanical nerve injury while still targeting peripheral sensitization mechanisms.

This prospective multicenter study is designed to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and clinical outcomes associated with intraneuroma and perineuroma ultrasound-guided botulinum toxin type A injection techniques in patients with chronic neuroma pain after combat-related amputation.

Patients with ultrasound-confirmed painful neuromas will undergo ultrasound-guided botulinum toxin type A injection using one of the two injection techniques according to local clinical practice and physician decision-making. Clinical follow-up will include assessment of neuroma pain intensity, neuropathic pain characteristics, phantom limb pain, residual limb pain, prosthesis tolerance, analgesic consumption, patient-reported improvement, and adverse events.

The study aims to improve understanding of ultrasound-guided botulinum toxin injection strategies for chronic neuroma pain and to identify potential differences in safety and clinical effectiveness between intraneuroma and perineuroma approaches in patients with combat-related amputations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥18 years
  • Combat-related limb amputation
  • Chronic neuroma pain lasting ≥3 months
  • Ultrasound-confirmed painful neuroma
  • Average neuroma pain intensity ≥4/10 on the Numeric Rating Scale
  • Ability to undergo ultrasound-guided injection
  • Stable analgesic regimen for at least 14 days before enrollment
  • Ability to provide written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Active infection at or near the injection site
  • Open wound preventing safe injection
  • Previous botulinum toxin injection for neuroma pain within 6 months
  • Previous neuroma surgery within 3 months
  • Known allergy to botulinum toxin type A
  • Coagulopathy or anticoagulation contraindicating injection
  • Severe uncontrolled systemic disease
  • Inability to complete follow-up assessments

Treatment and study plan

Botulinum toxin type A injection

Drug

Ultrasound-guided botulinum toxin type A injection performed for treatment of chronic neuroma pain after combat-related amputation. Two injection techniques will be evaluated: direct intraneuroma injection and perineuroma injection surrounding the neuroma. Procedures will be performed under sterile conditions using high-frequency musculoskeletal ultrasound guidance by clinicians experienced in ultrasound-guided pain interventions.

Other names: Ultrasound-Guided Botulinum Toxin Injection

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in chronic neuroma pain intensity

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 weeks after injection

    Change in chronic neuroma pain intensity will be assessed using the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Participants will rate their average neuroma-related pain during the previous 7 days on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates "no pain" and 10 indicates "worst imaginable pain." The change from baseline NRS score will be calculated at each follow-up assessment.

    Scale Information:

    Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)

    Minimum Value:

    0

    Maximum Value:

    10 Interpretation: Higher scores indicate greater chronic neuroma pain intensity and worse clinical outcomes. Negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Neuropathic Pain Characteristics Assessed Using the painDETECT Questionnaire (PD-Q)

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 and 24 weeks

    Neuropathic pain characteristics will be assessed using the painDETECT Questionnaire (PD-Q), a validated self-administered questionnaire designed to identify and quantify neuropathic pain symptoms. The questionnaire evaluates sensory descriptors, pain course pattern, and pain radiation. Total scores range from -1 to 38.

    Scale Information:

    painDETECT Questionnaire (PD-Q)

    Minimum Value:

    -1

    Maximum Value:

    38

    Interpretation:

    Higher scores indicate more pronounced neuropathic pain characteristics and a greater likelihood of neuropathic pain.

    Clinical Interpretation:

    ≤12 = Neuropathic pain unlikely 13-18 = Uncertain neuropathic pain component

    ≥19 = Neuropathic pain likely

  2. Residual Limb Pain Intensity

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 and 24 weeks

    Residual limb pain intensity will be assessed using the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Participants will rate their average residual limb pain during the previous 7 days on a scale from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("worst imaginable pain").

    Scale Information:

    Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Minimum Value: 0 Maximum Value: 10 Interpretation: Higher scores indicate greater residual limb pain intensity and worse pain outcomes.

  3. Prosthesis Tolerance Assessed Using Average Daily Prosthesis Wearing Time

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after amputation or intervention.

    Prosthesis tolerance will be assessed by measuring the average daily duration of prosthesis use reported by the participant. Average daily prosthesis wearing time will be recorded as the total number of hours the prosthesis is worn during a typical day.

    Measurement:

    Average daily prosthesis wearing time

    Unit of Measure:

    Hours per day (hours/day)

    Minimum Value:

    0 hours/day

    Maximum Value:

    24 hours/day Interpretation: Higher values indicate better prosthesis tolerance, greater comfort during use, and improved adaptation to the prosthesis.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Dmytro Dmytriiev, PhD.Professor

CONTACT

[email protected]

+380674309449

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Ukrainian Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Therapy

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Comparative Evaluation of Intraneuroma and Perineuroma Botulinum Toxin Type A Injection Techniques for Chronic Neuroma Pain After Combat-Related Amputation: A Prospective Multicenter Study

Acronym: IN-PERI NEUROM

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Jun 3, 2026
Registry last updated
Jun 3, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.