KasrAlainy Hospitals
Cairo, Egypt
NCT Number: NCT07274280
This study aims to compare the Ambu AuraGain, LarySeal Pro LMA, and i-gel regarding their insertion characteristics, ventilation efficacy, risk of gastric insufflation, fiberoptic view quality, intraoperative and postoperative airway-related complications, and hemodynamic stability.165 consecutive pediatric patients aged 2-9 years, weighing 10-30 kg, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II, and scheduled for elective day-case surgery suitable for supraglottic airway device (SGAD) use.Patients will be randomly assigned (n= 55 per group) using a computer-generated random number sequence (www.random.org) to one of three groups:
* Group I: Ambu® AuraGain TM (Ambu Ltd Xiang Yu Xiamen, Fujian, China) * Group II: LarySeal Pro® LMA (Flexicare Medical Limited, Cynon Valley Business Park, Mountain Ash, UK).Patients will receive oral midazolam before anesthesia, followed by standard monitoring, induction with sevoflurane, fentanyl, and atracurium, and insertion of an appropriately sized SGAD by experienced anesthesiologists. Ventilation quality, oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP), peak airway pressure (Ppeak), fiberoptic glottic view, and gastric insufflation by ultrasound will be assessed. Anesthesia will be maintained with controlled ventilation and cuff pressure adjusted to 60 cmH₂O. At the end, neuromuscular blockade will be reversed, devices removed upon awakening, and patients observed for complications such as laryngospasm, Outcome parameter (s): * Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure (OLP). * Demographic and Clinical Data. * Hemodynamics. * Insertion Data. * Peak Airway Pressure (Ppeak). * Fiberoptic Glottic View Assessment. * Ultrasound Assessment of Gastric Insufflation. * Perioperative Complications.bronchospasm, or sore throat. * Group III: I-gelTM (Intersurgical Ltd, Berkshire, RG41 2RZ, UK).
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me2 year–9 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Cairo, Egypt
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
use of supraglottic airway device as an airway control device for pediatric patients during day case surgery under controlled ventilation
Time frame: from enrollment to the end of the study at 6 months
Time frame: From enrollement to the end of the study at 6 months
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of the study at 6 months
Time frame: From enrollement to the end of the study at 6 months
Kasr El Aini Hospital
Other
Comparative Evaluation of Ambu AuraGain, LarySeal Pro LMA and I-gel in Pediatric Airway Management for Day-Case Surgery Under Controlled Ventilation: A Randomized Comparative Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07673003
Airway Control, Airway Devices
Multan, Punjab Province, Pakistan
View Trial DetailsNCT04100564
Accidental Injuries, Airway Control
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07391969
Airway Control, Anesthesia
View Trial DetailsNCT07086378
Airway Anesthesia, Airway Control
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial Details