Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02064192

Comparative Effectiveness Research to Assess the Use of Primary ProphylacTic Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators in Europe

The "EUropean Comparative Effectiveness Research to assess the use of primary prophylacTic Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators (EU-CERT-ICD)" is a modular research project to study the effectiveness of prophylactic ICDs in a prospective study, a retrospective registry, and meta-analyses of existing evidence on the subject.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

The prospective study part is an observational, prospective multi-centre study which aims to enrol 2500 patients with ischemic or dilated cardiomyopathy and primary prophylactic ICD indication for reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) according to current guidelines. According to the treating physician's decision and preference which is independent from study participation, patients are recruited into one of two groups: patients directly prior to first ICD implantation (ICD Group), or patients who are not considered for prophylactic ICD treatment by the physician or are considered but refuse ICD treatment (Control Group). Patients will undergo simple 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) and Holter ECG diagnostics at baseline as well as genetic biobanking at entry to the study. All patients will be subsequently followed for at least 1 year and up to 4 years. Co-primary endpoints are all-cause mortality and appropriate ICD shocks.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Ischemic or dilated cardiomyopathy and recommendation for primary prophylactic ICD treatment following current international treatment guidelines
  • Written informed consent
  • If ICD implantation is planned, enrollment and study baseline testing needs to be completed before de-novo ICD implantation

Exclusion criteria

  • Permanent atrial fibrillation or atrial fibrillation at baseline in case more than 15% of such patients at a given time have been enrolled
  • Indication for secondary prophylactic ICD treatment
  • Indication or candidate for cardiac resynchronization therapy
  • AV block II°-III° at resting heart rates
  • Implanted pacemaker
  • Unstable cardiac disease such as decompensated heart failure (NYHA functional class IV) or acute coronary syndrome
  • Participation in other clinical trials which exclude enrolment in other trials

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. All-Cause Mortality

    Time frame: one to five years

    Co-Primary Endpoint

  2. First Appropriate ICD Shock

    Time frame: one to five years

    Co-Primary Endpoint

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to First Inappropriate Shock

    Time frame: one to five years

  2. Sudden Cardiac Death

    Time frame: one to five years

  3. Cardiac Death

    Time frame: one to five years

  4. Non-Cardiac Death

    Time frame: one to five years

  5. Arrhythmogenic Syncope

    Time frame: one to five years

    presumed arrhythmogenic syncopes (per the judgment of each investigator and the endpoint committee)

  6. Resuscitation

    Time frame: one to five years

    successful resuscitation for ventricular tachyarrhythmias (especially in the non ICD Control Group)

  7. Any ICD Shock

    Time frame: one to five years

    any ICD shock (appropriate or inappropriate)

  8. Atrial Fibrillation

    Time frame: one to five years

    atrial fibrillation (if documented), defined as an atrial tachyarrhythmia >250 beats per minute (bpm) lasting at least 30 seconds is considered as secondary endpoint

  9. Quality of Life

    Time frame: one to five years

    Quality of life (QoL) will be assessed using the questionnaires SF 36, MacNew and Florida Patient Acceptance Survey

  10. Device Revision / Device Replacement

    Time frame: one to five years

    the secondary endpoint Device Revision/Replacement will be recorded as electrode dislocation/revision, device revision for pocket hematoma, perforation, or infection, device exchange due to malfunction, battery exhaustion, other reason, or upgrade to dual chamber or CRT-D

  11. Costs and Cost-Effectiveness

    Time frame: one to five years

    the secondary endpoint "Costs" will be assessed using patient questionnaires to the German-speaking study sites, an extension to other participating countries will be decided during the study, the assessment of cost-effectiveness will be realised by comparing cost-results with regard to changes in QoL

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University Medical Center Goettingen

Other

Registry information

Acronym: EU-CERT-ICD

Important dates

Study start
2014
Primary completion
2019
Study completion
2019
First posted
Feb 17, 2014
Registry last updated
Mar 24, 2020

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.