Combined therapy
ProcedurePatients undergoing combined therapy
Other names: Transarterial chemoembolization + Microwave ablation
NCT Number: NCT04721470
The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of combined therapy with conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) + microwave ablation (MWA) versus only TACE or MWA for treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) >3-<5 cm.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–80 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
This study aims to compare the safety and efficacy of combined therapy with conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE)+microwave ablation (MWA) versus only TACE or MWA for treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) >3-<5 cm.
This randomized controlled trial screened 278 patients with HCC >3-<5 cm. Patients were randomized into three groups: 90 underwent TACE (Group 1); 95 underwent MWA (Group 2); and 93 underwent combined therapy (Group 3). Patients were followed-up with contrast-enhanced CT or MRI. Images were evaluated and compared for treatment response and adverse events based on modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumor. Serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) concentration was measured at baseline and during every follow-up visit.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Patients undergoing combined therapy
Other names: Transarterial chemoembolization + Microwave ablation
Patients undergoing Microwave ablation
Patients undergoing Transarterial chemoembolization
Time frame: Up to three years after procedure
Images were evaluated and compared for adverse events. The adverse events were recorded and classified following the guidelines of the Society of Interventional Radiology
Time frame: One month
Tumor response was evaluated by CECT or dynamic MRI based on the modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumor (m-RECIST) established by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.
Time frame: 12 months after procedure
The recurrence rate was measured in relation to management lines.
Time frame: Three years after procedure
The mortality rate was measured in relation to management lines.
Time frame: Three years after procedure
The progression-free survival was measured in relation to management lines.
Time frame: Baseline and 1-2 months after procedure
The AFP variation rate (ΔAFP) was defined as the percentage of change between the AFP concentration at baseline and the postprocedure AFP concentration after 1-2 months as shown in the following equation:
ΔAFP (%) = [(AFPbaseline-AFPpostprocedure) /AFPbaseline] ×100%
Zagazig University
Other Gov
Combined Therapy With Conventional Trans-arterial Chemoembolization (cTACE) and Microwave Ablation (MWA) for Hepatocellular Carcinoma >3-<5 cm
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04892810
Adenocarcinoma, Carcinoma
Grenoble, France
View Trial DetailsNCT04930315
Adenocarcinoma, Carcinoma
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
View Trial DetailsNCT05128032
Adenocarcinoma, Carcinoma
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04374877
Adenocarcinoma, Advanced Solid Tumor
Duarte, California, United States
View Trial Details