NCT Number: NCT00504465
Combined Agent Randomized Trial of Induction of Labor
To compare sequential dinoprostone and oxytocin for induction of labor at term with intact membranes and an unripe cervix to two simultaneous regimens. Our aim was to confirm findings from smaller trials and add to data on fetal safety.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeKey information
Conditions
Age range
18 year–45 year
Sex eligibility
All sexes
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Not applicable
Primary location
The Brooklyn Hospital Center, Brooklyn, New York, United States
About this study
This study is a non-blinded, three arm randomized trial at 3 sites. Entry criteria were: >36 weeks' singleton, cephalic gestation with intact membranes and an unripe cervix (Bishop's score <6). Study arms were: 1) dinoprostone vaginal insert (Cervidil) for 12 hours followed by oxytocin, 2) dinoprostone vaginal insert (Cervidil) for 12 hours with simultaneous oxytocin, and 3) intracervical dinoprostone gel (Prepidil)(one dose) followed by immediate oxytocin. Primary outcome measure was the rate of vaginal delivery <24 hours. Secondary outcomes were randomization to delivery interval, rate of cesarean delivery (CD) for non reassuring fetal status (NRFS) and rate of uterine hyperstimulation.
Who can participate
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
- > or = to 36 weeks of gestation
- Singleton fetus
- Cephalic presentation
- Intact membranes and an unripe cervix (Bishop score <6)
Exclusion criteria
- Multifetal gestation
- Rupture of membranes
- Ripe cervix (Bishop score >6)
- Active labor
- Contraindication to vaginal delivery
- Previous uterine surgery
- Non-cephalic presentation
- Fetal macrosomia
Treatment and study plan
Primary outcomes
-
Rate of vaginal delivery <24 hours
Secondary outcomes
-
Randomization to delivery interval
-
Rate of cesarean delivery for non reassuring fetal status
-
Rate of uterine hyperstimulation
Sponsors and collaborators
Lead sponsor
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
Other
Registry information
Official study title
Cervical Ripening and Induction of Labor: a Randomized Controlled Trial of Combined Versus Sequential Use of Dinoprostone and Oxytocin.
Important dates
- Study start
- 2002
- Study completion
- 2007
- First posted
- Jul 20, 2007
- Registry last updated
- Jul 20, 2007
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Related clinical trials
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
Safety and Efficacy Study of Misoprostol Vaginal Insert for Induction of Labour
NCT00346840
Cervical Ripening, Labor Induction
Birmingham, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsDouble Balloon Catheter Versus Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert for Cervical Ripening.
NCT01170819
Cervical Ripening, Labor Induction
Varese, Italy
View Trial DetailsThe Comparison of Efficacy for Cervical Ripening in Labor Induction Between Titrated and Conventional Oral Misoprostol
NCT00886860
Cervical Ripening, Labor Induction
Bangkok, Thailand
View Trial DetailsTrial of Foley Catheter With and Without Extra-Amniotic Saline Infusion for Labor Induction
NCT00442663
Cervical Ripening, Labor Induction
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial Details