Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT05240976

Combination of NMDA-enhancing and Anti-inflammatory Treatments for Ultra-resistant Schizophrenia

Previous study found that some NMDA-enhancing agent was able to augment efficacy of clozapine for clinical symptoms but not cognitive function in the treatment of ultra-resistant schizophrenia. In addition, several drugs with anti-inflammatory properties have been tested in clinical trials for the treatment of schizophrenia. Whether a drug with anti-inflammatory property can strengthen the efficacy of an NMDA-enhancer (NMDAE) in the treatment of ultra-resistant schizophrenia remains unknown.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year–65 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

Department of Psychiatry, China Medical University Hospital

Taichung, Taiwan

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Hsien-Yuan Lane, M.D., Ph.D

CONTACT

[email protected]

886 4 22052121 ext. 1855

About this study

Several lines of evidence suggest that both NMDA and inflammatory hypotheses have been implicated in schizophrenia. Previous study found that some NMDA-enhancing agent was able to augment efficacy of clozapine for clinical symptoms but not cognitive function in the treatment of ultra-resistant schizophrenia. In addition, several drugs with anti-inflammatory properties have been tested in clinical trials for the treatment of schizophrenia. Whether a drug with anti-inflammatory property can strengthen the efficacy of an NMDA-enhancer (NMDAE) in the treatment of ultra-resistant schizophrenia remains unknown.

Therefore, this study aims to compare NMDAE plus a drug with anti-inflammatory property and NMDAE plus placebo in the treatment of ultra-resistant schizophrenia. The subjects are the patients with ultra-resistant schizophrenia who have responded poorly to clozapine treatment. They keep their original clozapine treatment and are randomly, double-blindly assigned into two treatment groups for 12 weeks: (1) NMDAE plus Anti-inflammatory Agent (AIFA), or (2) NMDAE plus placebo. Cognitive functions are assessed at baseline and at endpoint of treatment by a battery of tests. Clinical performances and side effects are measured at weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, 9, and 12. The efficacies of NMDAE plus AIFA and NMDAE plus placebo will be compared.

Chi-square (or Fisher's exact test) will be used to compare differences of categorical variables and t-test (or Mann-Whitney test if the distribution is not normal) for continuous variables between treatment groups. Mean changes from baseline in repeated-measure assessments will be assessed using the generalized estimating equation (GEE) for both primary and secondary outcomes . All p values for clinical measures will be based on two-tailed tests with a significance level of 0.05.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Have a DSM-5 (American Psychiatric Association) diagnosis of schizophrenia
  • Are treatment-resistant to standard treatments of at least two specific antipsychotics before clozapine treatment
  • Are receiving adequate trials of clozapine for more than 12 weeks but without satisfactory response
  • PANSS total score ≥ 70; SANS total score ≥ 40
  • Have sufficient education to communicate effectively and are capable of completing the assessments of the study
  • Agree to participate in the study and provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • DSM-5 diagnosis of intellectual disability or substance (including alcohol) use disorder
  • History of epilepsy, head trauma, or serious medical or central nervous system diseases (other than schizophrenia) which may interfere with the study
  • Clinically significant laboratory screening tests (including blood routine, biochemical tests)
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Inability to follow protocol

Treatment and study plan

NMDAE plus AIFA

Drug

Use of an NMDA enhancer plus a drug with anti-inflammatory property for the treatment of ultra-resistant schizophrenia.

NMDAE plus Placebo Cap

Drug

Use of an NMDA enhancer plus placebo as a comparator

Primary outcomes

  1. Change of cognitive function

    Time frame: Week 0, 12

    The measure is the composite from multiple measures. All tests have no unit. For the domain (a. and c.) with more than one test, a composite T score will be calculated by standardizing the average of each T score. Furthermore, a global composite score (for all seven domains) and a neurocognitive composite score (for the first 6 domains) will be also calculated by standardizing the average of the T score of each domain (Lane HY et al, JAMA Psychiatry 2013).

    Ten tests for assessing 7 cognitive domains:

    • speed of processing (assessed by Category Fluency, Trail Marking A, WAIS-III Digit Symbol-Coding);
    • sustained attention (Continuous Performance Test);
    • working memory: verbal (digit span) and nonverbal (spatial span);
    • verbal learning and memory (WMS-III, word listing);
    • visual learning and memory (WMS-III, visual reproduction);
    • reasoning and problem solving (WISC-III, Maze);
    • social cognition (MSCEIT Version 2)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change of Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)

    Time frame: week 0, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12

    Assessment of overall symptoms. Minimum value: 30, maximum value:210, the higher scores mean a worse outcome.

    As shown in "Detailed Description", "mean changes from baseline in repeated-measure assessments will be assessed using the generalized estimating equation (GEE) for both primary and secondary outcomes. That is, GEE is used for analyzing the changes from baseline in repeated-measure assessments by a single analysis (but not multiple analyses).

  2. Change of scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) total score

    Time frame: week 0, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12

    Assessment of negative symptoms. Minimum value: 0, maximum value:100, the higher scores mean a worse outcome.

  3. Chang of positive subscale of PANSS

    Time frame: week 0, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12

    Assessment of positive symptoms. Minimum value: 7, maximum value:49, the higher scores mean a worse outcome.

  4. Change of negative subscale of PANSS

    Time frame: week 0, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12

    Assessment of negative symptoms. Minimum value: 7, maximum value:49, the higher scores mean a worse outcome.

  5. Change of general Psychopathology subscale of PANSS

    Time frame: week 0, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12

    Assessment of general psychopathology. Minimum value: 16, maximum value:112, the higher scores mean a worse outcome

  6. Change of clinical Global Impression

    Time frame: week 0, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12

    Assessment of general impression. Minimum value: 1, maximum value:7, the higher scores mean a worse outcome.

  7. Change of global Assessment of Functioning

    Time frame: week 0, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12

    Assessment of social, occupational, and psychological function. Minimum value: 1, maximum value:100, the higher scores mean better function.

  8. Change of hamilton Rating Scale for Depression

    Time frame: week 0, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12

    Assessment of depressive symptoms. Minimum value: 0, maximum value:52, the higher scores mean a worse outcome.

  9. Change of quality of Life Scale

    Time frame: week 0, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12

    Assessment of life quality. Minimum value: 0, maximum value:126, the higher scores mean a better outcome.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Hsien-Yuan Lane, M.D., Ph.D

CONTACT

[email protected]

886 4 22052121 ext. 1855

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

China Medical University Hospital

Other

Collaborators

  • National Health Research Institutes, Taiwan

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2027
First posted
Feb 15, 2022
Registry last updated
Mar 24, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.