Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT04917302

Combination of NMDA-enhancing and Anti-inflammatory Treatments for Schizophrenia

Previous studies found that some NMDA-enhancing agents were able to improve clinical symptoms of patients with chronic schizophrenia. In addition, several drugs with anti-inflammatory properties have been tested in clinical trials for the treatment of schizophrenia too. Whether combined treatment of an NMDA-enhancing agent and a drug with anti-inflammatory property can be better than an NMDA-enhancing agent alone deserves study.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year–65 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

Department of Psychiatry, China Medical University Hospital

Taichung, Taiwan

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Hsien-Yuan Lane, M.D., Ph.D

CONTACT

[email protected]

886 4 22052121 ext. 1855

About this study

Several lines of evidence suggest that both NMDA and inflammatory hypotheses have been implicated in schizophrenia. Previous studies found that some NMDA-enhancing agents were able to augment efficacy of antipsychotics in the treatment of chronic schizophrenia. In addition, several drugs with anti-inflammatory properties have been tested in clinical trials for the treatment of schizophrenia too. Whether a drug with anti-inflammatory property can strengthen the efficacy of an NMDA-enhancer (NMDAE) in the treatment of schizophrenia remains unknow. Therefore, this study aims to compare NMDAE plus a drug with anti-inflammatory property and NMDAE plus placebo in the treatment of schizophrenia. The subjects are the patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia who have responded poorly to two or more kinds of antipsychotics treatment. They keep their original treatment and are randomly, double-blindly assigned into two treatment groups for 12 weeks: (1) NMDAE plus Anti-inflammatory Agent (AIFA), or (2) NMDAE plus placebo. Clinical performances and side effects are measured at weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, 9, and 12. Cognitive functions are assessed at baseline and at endpoint of treatment by a battery of tests. The efficacies of NMDAE plus AIFA and NMDAE plus placebo will be compared.

Chi-square (or Fisher's exact test) will be used to compare differences of categorical variables and t-test (or Mann-Whitney test if the distribution is not normal) for continuous variables between treatment groups. Mean changes from baseline in repeated-measure assessments will be assessed using the generalized estimating equation (GEE). All p values for clinical measures will be based on two-tailed tests with a significance level of 0.05.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Have a DSM-5 (American Psychiatric Association) diagnosis of schizophrenia
  • Are resistant to adequate treatments of at least two antipsychotics
  • Remain symptomatic but without clinically significant fluctuation, while their antipsychotic doses are unchanged for at least 3 months and will be maintained during the period of the 12-week trial
  • PANSS total score ≥ 70
  • Agree to participate in the study and provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • DSM-5 diagnosis of intellectual disability or substance (including alcohol) use disorder
  • History of epilepsy, head trauma, stroke, or serious medical or central nervous system diseases (other than schizophrenia) which may interfere with the study
  • Clinically significant laboratory screening tests (including blood routine, biochemical tests)
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Inability to follow protocol

Treatment and study plan

NMDAE plus AIFA

Drug

Use of an NMDA enhancer plus a drug with anti-inflammatory property for the treatment of schizophrenia.

NMDAE plus Placebo Cap

Drug

Use of an NMDA enhancer plus placebo as a comparator

Primary outcomes

  1. Change of Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)

    Time frame: week 0, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12]

    Assessment of overall symptoms. Minimum value: 30, maximum value:210, the higher scores mean a worse outcome.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change of scales for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) total score

    Time frame: 0, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12

    Assessment of negative symptoms. Minimum value: 0, maximum value:100, the higher scores mean a worse outcome.

  2. Positive subscale, Negative subscales, and General Psychopathology subscale of PANSS

    Time frame: week 0, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12

    PANSS-positive: Assessment of positive symptoms. Minimum value: 7, maximum value:49, the higher scores mean a worse outcome.

    PANSS-negative: Assessment of negative symptoms. Minimum value: 7, maximum value:49, the higher scores mean a worse outcome.

    PANSS-general psychopathology: Assessment of general psychopathology. Minimum value: 16, maximum value:112, the higher scores mean a worse outcome

  3. Clinical Global Impression

    Time frame: week 0, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12

    Assessment of general impression. Minimum value: 1, maximum value:7, the higher scores mean a worse outcome.

  4. Global Assessment of Functioning

    Time frame: week 0, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12

    Assessment of social, occupational, and psychological function. Minimum value: 1, maximum value:100, the higher scores mean better function.

  5. Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression

    Time frame: week 0, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12

    Assessment of depressive symptoms. Minimum value: 0, maximum value:52, the higher scores mean a worse outcome.

  6. Quality of Life Scale

    Time frame: week 0, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12

    Assessment of life quality. Minimum value: 0, maximum value:126, the higher scores mean a better outcome.

  7. Cognitive function

    Time frame: Week 0, 12

    The measure is the composite from multiple measures.

    Ten cognitive tests for assessment of 7 cognitive domains:

    • speed of processing (assessed by 3 tests: Category Fluency, Trail Marking A, WAIS-III Digit Symbol-Coding);
    • sustained attention (Continuous Performance Test);
    • working memory: verbal (digit span) and nonverbal (spatial span);
    • verbal learning and memory (WMS-III, word listing);
    • visual learning and memory (WMS-III, visual reproduction);
    • reasoning and problem solving (WISC-III, Maze);
    • social cognition (the Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test [MSCEIT] Version 2)

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Hsien-Yuan Lane, M.D., Ph.D

CONTACT

[email protected]

886 4 22052121 ext. 1855

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

China Medical University Hospital

Other

Collaborators

  • Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2020
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Jun 8, 2021
Registry last updated
Feb 19, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.