Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06628778

Collaborative Risk-stratified Investigation in Thrombosis-prone Inpatients With Critical Illness: Anticoagulation With LMWH in Teens for ThromboProphylaxis (CRITICAL-Teens-TP).

Critically ill adolescents are at greatest risk for developing hospital-acquired venous thromboembolism. To date, no phase 3 randomized controlled trials have been conducted for pharmacological thromboprophylaxis as primary venous thromboembolism prevention in children. The investigators will perform a United States definitive multicenter phase 3 randomized controlled trial of the low molecular weight heparin enoxaparin as primary venous thromboembolism prophylaxis among critically ill adolescents who are classified a priori as high risk based upon the investigators validated risk prediction models.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

12 year–18 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Johns Hopkins All Children"s Hospital

St. Petersburg, Florida, 33704, United States

Location contact

Anthony A Sochet

CONTACT

[email protected]

727-767-2912

Anthony A Sochet, MD, MSc

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

About this study

This trial will establish definitive evidence on the comparative efficacy and safety of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis with the low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) enoxaparin versus no pharmacological thromboprophylaxis for the primary prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE), including deep vein thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism) among critically ill adolescents who meet a priori criteria for high risk of hospital-acquired (HA-) VTE. In the past two decades, the diagnosis of pediatric hospital-acquired VTE (HA-VTE) in the U.S. has increased 130-200-fold. The investigators have shown that critically-ill adolescents are one the highest risk subpopulations for HA-VTE, with average occurrence rates of 13.2% (range: 6.3-19.8%), and have derived and prospectively validated risk models for HA-VTE in this population. Despite a simultaneously increased risk of bleeding in critically ill adolescents, particularly after surgery or major trauma, an investigator-initiated multicenter phase 2 trial recently led by the investigators group during the COVID-19 pandemic demonstrated the safety of LMWH for primary HA-VTE prevention. To date, risk-stratified phase 3 Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) of LMWH thromboprophylaxis as primary HA-VTE prevention in children have not been performed. The investigators will perform a U.S.-based definitive multicenter phase 3 RCT of the LMWH enoxaparin versus no pharmacological thromboprophylaxis for VTE prevention among critically ill adolescents at highest a priori risk for HA-VTE applying evidence from the investigators published risk prediction models.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Admission Age between 12- 18 years of age
  • Within 24 hours of pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admission for enrollment
  • Presence of a Central Venous Catheter
  • Presumed or confirmed infection or systemic inflammatory condition

Exclusion criteria

  • Active treatment for VTE or known VTE present prior to or on pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admission
  • Current receipt of an antithrombotic agent excluding unfractionated heparin for vascular catheter patency
  • Active ISTH-defined clinically relevant bleeding
  • Surgery in the last 7-days
  • Major trauma within the last 7-days
  • Admission for management of congenital heart disease including perioperative management of critical congenital heart disease
  • Presence of coagulopathy including:
  • International normalized ratio (INR) 2.0 activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) 50 seconds Platelet count 50 x103/mL
  • Creatinine clearance 30 ml/min/1.73 m2
  • Known hypersensitivity to heparin or pork products
  • Laboratory confirmed heparin induced thrombocytopenia
  • Current pregnancy or lactation,
  • Presence of an epidural catheter
  • Prior enrollment in the CRITICAL-Teens-TP Trial

Treatment and study plan

Enoxaparin

Drug

Enoxaparin thromboprophylaxis administered subcutaneously twice daily (every 12 hours) from enrollment through pediatric intensive care unit discharge

Primary outcomes

  1. Risk (i.e., cumulative incidence) of Symptomatic venous thromboembolism

    Time frame: From randomization through discharge from the pediatric intensive care unit, approximately 1-2 weeks

    International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) defined symptomatic venous thromboembolism

  2. Risk (i.e., cumulative incidence) of Clinically relevant bleeding

    Time frame: From randomization through discharge from the pediatric intensive care unit, approximately 1-2 weeks

    International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) defined clinically relevant bleeding (Major bleeding + Clinically relevant Non-major bleeding)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Net Clinical Benefit - Modelled Attributable Risk Difference in HA-VTE (Efficacy) by Attributable Risk Difference in clinically relevant bleeding (Safety)

    Time frame: From randomization through discharge from the pediatric intensive care unit, approximately 1-2 weeks

    Net clinical benefit is a bivariate endpoint analysis (i.e., trade-off of venous thromboembolism and bleeding risks as described below). One-year risks and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) of hospital-acquired venous thromboembolism and clinically relevant bleeding for each study arm will be calculated from weighted Kaplan-Meier curves. A bivariate decision curve will be specified using the 12-month absolute risk difference for venous thromboembolism and bleeding outcomes. Bivariate outcomes for enoxaparin and no pharmacological thromboprophylaxis will be compared under a hypothesis of superiority using the superiority boundary of a bivariate endpoint analysis, with inference based on the 95% confidence rectangle (i.e., the rectangle defined by the 95% CI for hospital-acquired venous thromboembolism absolute risk difference and the 95% CI for bleeding absolute risk difference). Superiority will be decided if the 95% confidence rectangle rules out the superiority curve.

  2. Risk (i.e. cumulative incidence) of symptomatic venous thromboembolism

    Time frame: From randomization through 30-days post discharge from the pediatric intensive care unit

    International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis-defined symptomatic venous thromboembolism

  3. Risk (i.e. cumulative incidence) of clinically relevant bleeding

    Time frame: From randomization through 30-days post discharge from the pediatric intensive care unit

    International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis-defined clinically relevant bleeding (Major Bleeding + Clinically Relevant Non-Major Bleeding)

  4. Serious adverse events

    Time frame: From randomization through 30-days post discharge from the pediatric intensive care unit

    As federally defined.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Anthony A Sochet, MD, MSc

CONTACT

[email protected]

727-767-2912

Neil A Goldenberg, MD, Phd

CONTACT

[email protected]

727-767-2912

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital

Other

Collaborators

  • University of California, San Diego

Registry information

Official study title

Collaborative Risk-stratified Investigation in Thrombosis-prone Inpatients With Critical Illness: Anticoagulation With LMWH in Teens for ThromboProphylaxis (CRITICAL-Teens-TP)

Important dates

Study start
2027
Primary completion
2034
Study completion
2035
First posted
Oct 8, 2024
Registry last updated
May 26, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.