Enhanced COACH CDS Tool
OtherCDS tool with features to promote high blood pressure management
NCT Number: NCT06124716
Hypertension is a significant contributor to poor cardiovascular outcomes. Self-management support tools can increase patient behaviors to improve blood pressure. The investigators created a clinical decision support app, called COACH, to integrate home blood pressure data and goals into EHR reporting and workflow with communications informed by behavioral economics principles to support shared decision-making. The study aims to measure the effectiveness of the COACH intervention in a pragmatic multi-site randomized trial in a primary care setting.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
18 year–100 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, Missouri, United States
This protocol addresses the challenge of implementing scalable, interoperable clinical decision support (CDS) and the patient-centered outcome of avoiding heart attacks and strokes through high blood pressure control in the setting of multiple chronic illnesses. It leverages substantial extant work to build patient-centered CDS for high blood pressure, electronic care planning and health coaching at scale, implementing and testing these tools in new primary care settings. This protocol implements a new patient-facing CDS across multiple clinic sites spanning three major health systems and in the nation's two leading EHR vendor platforms. Controlling blood pressure is a singularly important goal; nearly 50% of adults in health care have high blood pressure, which increases their risk of heart attack and stroke. However, managing blood pressure requires navigation within a narrow therapeutic index, where overtreatment leads to substantial complications, including kidney damage, low blood pressure, falls, and mood disorders. Balancing treatment to reduce risk while avoiding harm requires engaging patients directly in intensive goal setting, shared care planning around nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic treatments, and self-monitoring for effectiveness and adverse events.
Hypertension rarely occurs alone; providing clinical decision support, care planning, and self-management support in the context of multiple chronic illnesses is required.
The study team will address patient-centered needs by scaling our implemented, patient-facing CDS for eCare Planning, Collaboration Oriented Approach to Controlling High blood pressure (COACH) to 3 sites and testing whether it reduces blood pressure and risk of heart attack and stroke. To do so, we embed a diverse patient perspective into a robust, feasible, and effective CDS implementation and evaluation process by 1) capturing patient input throughout the CDS lifecycle; 2) adapting the COACH CDS to patient preferences, values, and goals; and 3) disseminating the tested FHIR-based (Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources) patient-facing application into organizations that combines blood pressure control with relevant risk scores into an eCare Plan application and framework and implementing these patient-centered approaches in feasible, context-responsive, and effective ways. The investigators address scalability by helping organizations advance their use of patient-generated health data and patient-reported outcomes using standard implementation frameworks while producing CDS artifacts and implementation guides that can be leveraged to increase adoption beyond the work of this proposal. For interoperability, we use a standard-based, structured process that re-uses concept and value sets whenever possible while using robust techniques to develop new sets and make them available for future innovators.
To complete these goals, the study investigators leverage previous work in building standardized HBP value sets, logic, and a patient-facing FHIR tool. In this work, we have engaged in several collaborations, most notably with the CDS Connect Community, where we will upload all artifacts, but also with other AHRQ digital health efforts and with other large collaboratives, including the ACC/AHA and JNC8 guideline developers, the HL7 CPG-on-FHIR, and the eCare Planning project from NIDDK and AHRQ. The study investigators will use two frameworks to evaluate the implementation. First, adaptation in implementation science is both common and may be required for success; we explore the ways in which the 5 rights-the right information to the right person in the right intervention format through the right channel at the right time in workflow-can be adapted for key organizational needs while retaining fidelity to the goals. In addition, we consider a framework that combines usability with effectiveness for complex conditions by exploring concepts related to appropriate simplicity, prioritization, summarization, adjudication, and actionability to enhance CDS effectiveness for patient needs.
Thus, the study's specific aims are:
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
CDS tool with features to promote high blood pressure management
CDS tool with limited features to promote high blood pressure management
Time frame: Up to 6 months
Percent of participants at or below 140/90 (office BP) or 135/85 (home BP) average.
Time frame: Up to 6 months
Percent of participants displaying a decrease in systolic and/or diastolic blood pressure readings over the 6-month course of measurement
Time frame: Up to 6 months
Age- and socioeconomic status-reported participant data
Time frame: Up to 6 months
Participant assessment of application using the System Usability Scale questions using 4-point scale for 10 agreement questions where low scores indicate less agreement and high scores are higher agreement of usability of the application
Time frame: 2 months, 6 months
Participant self-report of factors related to health beliefs using 10-point sliding scale for 25 agreement questions where low scores indicate less agreement and high scores are higher agreement of aspects of health beliefs
Oregon Health and Science University
Other
Acronym: COACH
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05075902
Cardiovascular Diseases, Chronic Disease
Uberlândia, Minas Gerais, Brazil
View Trial DetailsNCT05543720
Behavior, Behavioral Symptoms
Brampton, Ontario, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT06248190
Asthma, Behavior
Pietermaritzburg, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
View Trial DetailsNCT03874754
Cancer, Cardiovascular Diseases
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
View Trial Details