Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Active, Not Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06124716

Collaboration Oriented Approach to Controlling High Blood Pressure

Hypertension is a significant contributor to poor cardiovascular outcomes. Self-management support tools can increase patient behaviors to improve blood pressure. The investigators created a clinical decision support app, called COACH, to integrate home blood pressure data and goals into EHR reporting and workflow with communications informed by behavioral economics principles to support shared decision-making. The study aims to measure the effectiveness of the COACH intervention in a pragmatic multi-site randomized trial in a primary care setting.

Active, Not Recruiting

This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.

Key information

Age range

18 year–100 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, Missouri, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

This protocol addresses the challenge of implementing scalable, interoperable clinical decision support (CDS) and the patient-centered outcome of avoiding heart attacks and strokes through high blood pressure control in the setting of multiple chronic illnesses. It leverages substantial extant work to build patient-centered CDS for high blood pressure, electronic care planning and health coaching at scale, implementing and testing these tools in new primary care settings. This protocol implements a new patient-facing CDS across multiple clinic sites spanning three major health systems and in the nation's two leading EHR vendor platforms. Controlling blood pressure is a singularly important goal; nearly 50% of adults in health care have high blood pressure, which increases their risk of heart attack and stroke. However, managing blood pressure requires navigation within a narrow therapeutic index, where overtreatment leads to substantial complications, including kidney damage, low blood pressure, falls, and mood disorders. Balancing treatment to reduce risk while avoiding harm requires engaging patients directly in intensive goal setting, shared care planning around nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic treatments, and self-monitoring for effectiveness and adverse events.

Hypertension rarely occurs alone; providing clinical decision support, care planning, and self-management support in the context of multiple chronic illnesses is required.

The study team will address patient-centered needs by scaling our implemented, patient-facing CDS for eCare Planning, Collaboration Oriented Approach to Controlling High blood pressure (COACH) to 3 sites and testing whether it reduces blood pressure and risk of heart attack and stroke. To do so, we embed a diverse patient perspective into a robust, feasible, and effective CDS implementation and evaluation process by 1) capturing patient input throughout the CDS lifecycle; 2) adapting the COACH CDS to patient preferences, values, and goals; and 3) disseminating the tested FHIR-based (Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources) patient-facing application into organizations that combines blood pressure control with relevant risk scores into an eCare Plan application and framework and implementing these patient-centered approaches in feasible, context-responsive, and effective ways. The investigators address scalability by helping organizations advance their use of patient-generated health data and patient-reported outcomes using standard implementation frameworks while producing CDS artifacts and implementation guides that can be leveraged to increase adoption beyond the work of this proposal. For interoperability, we use a standard-based, structured process that re-uses concept and value sets whenever possible while using robust techniques to develop new sets and make them available for future innovators.

To complete these goals, the study investigators leverage previous work in building standardized HBP value sets, logic, and a patient-facing FHIR tool. In this work, we have engaged in several collaborations, most notably with the CDS Connect Community, where we will upload all artifacts, but also with other AHRQ digital health efforts and with other large collaboratives, including the ACC/AHA and JNC8 guideline developers, the HL7 CPG-on-FHIR, and the eCare Planning project from NIDDK and AHRQ. The study investigators will use two frameworks to evaluate the implementation. First, adaptation in implementation science is both common and may be required for success; we explore the ways in which the 5 rights-the right information to the right person in the right intervention format through the right channel at the right time in workflow-can be adapted for key organizational needs while retaining fidelity to the goals. In addition, we consider a framework that combines usability with effectiveness for complex conditions by exploring concepts related to appropriate simplicity, prioritization, summarization, adjudication, and actionability to enhance CDS effectiveness for patient needs.

Thus, the study's specific aims are:

  • To refine and implement a patient-facing, adaptable Blood Pressure Control CDS system in 3 diverse settings, using implementation science and patient engagement to maximize effectiveness.
  • To evaluate the effectiveness of the application at lowering blood pressure employing a mixed methods design, with qualitative inquiry nested within a randomized controlled trial, secondary RE-AIM and social cognitive theory outcomes, and qualitative evaluation of implementations across sites.
  • To develop robust, sharable, interoperable mechanisms, leveraging collaborations and synthesis of the implementation experience to aid in further dissemination and implementations of patient-facing CDS.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients aged 18-100 years old
  • Patient receives care at a participating primary care clinic and has been seen in the last year
  • Patient has high BP, defined as an average of 4 BPs > 140 systolic or > 90 diastolic (clinic) or > 135 OR > 85 (home)
  • Patient is enrolled in online health portal
  • Patient can communicate in English
  • Patient has been recommended by their physician who thinks the patient would benefit from a home blood pressure monitoring program.

Exclusion criteria

  • Patient is pregnant at the time of consent
  • Patient who, in the opinion of the primary care clinician, has severe cognitive impairment
  • Patient is on hospice care and/or has a life expectancy of less than 2 years
  • Patient has end stage renal disease
  • Patient for whom tight blood pressure control presents a greater risk, such as those with a history of adverse events from hypertension treatment (falls, dizziness, electrolyte disturbances, hypotension, active heart failure)
  • Patient has any other disease or disorder that in the opinion of the investigator or the patient's primary care clinician, could put participants at risk and affect trial results, or hinder participation will exclude them from participating

Treatment and study plan

Enhanced COACH CDS Tool

Other

CDS tool with features to promote high blood pressure management

Usual Care COACH CDS Tool

Other

CDS tool with limited features to promote high blood pressure management

Primary outcomes

  1. Blood Pressure Control

    Time frame: Up to 6 months

    Percent of participants at or below 140/90 (office BP) or 135/85 (home BP) average.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Reduction in Systolic and/or Diastolic Blood Pressure

    Time frame: Up to 6 months

    Percent of participants displaying a decrease in systolic and/or diastolic blood pressure readings over the 6-month course of measurement

  2. Demographic factors contributing to blood pressure control

    Time frame: Up to 6 months

    Age- and socioeconomic status-reported participant data

  3. COACH Application System Usability Evaluation

    Time frame: Up to 6 months

    Participant assessment of application using the System Usability Scale questions using 4-point scale for 10 agreement questions where low scores indicate less agreement and high scores are higher agreement of usability of the application

  4. Participant report of health behaviors including Self Efficacy, Social Support, Outcome Expectations and Self-regulation

    Time frame: 2 months, 6 months

    Participant self-report of factors related to health beliefs using 10-point sliding scale for 25 agreement questions where low scores indicate less agreement and high scores are higher agreement of aspects of health beliefs

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Oregon Health and Science University

Other

Collaborators

  • University of Missouri-Columbia
  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Registry information

Acronym: COACH

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Nov 9, 2023
Registry last updated
Apr 9, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.