Cochlear Implant
DeviceCochlear implantation of a device from one of the three manufacturers available in the US.
NCT Number: NCT04793412
This is a two-phase study that compares performance growth pre-implant with current hearing aid (HA) technology versus post-implant with a cochlear implant (CI) in children with either asymmetric hearing loss (AHL) or single-sided deafness (SSD). Post-implant performance with a CI alone is expected to outperform pre-implant performance with a HA. The study also evaluates the effectiveness of bimodal hearing defined as a CI in the poor ear and a HA in the better ear for AHL or a CI in the poor ear and normal hearing in the better ear for SSD compared to pre-implant performance. The study examines factors contributing to CI outcomes.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me4 year–14 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States
The study is conducted as a multicenter, prospective, two-phase clinical trial, evaluating the efficacy and safety of cochlear implantation in children with asymmetric hearing loss (AHL) or single-sided deafness (SSD). A hearing aid (HA) phase occurs over a minimum of 4 mos prior to obtaining a cochlear implant (CI). A CI phase occurs over the 15-month period after initial activation of the CI. The AHL/SSD groups are tested for change in performance pre- to post-implant. Investigators also collect longitudinal data over 12 months (matching the 3 to 15 month post-implant timeframe) from normal hearing (NH) participants to provide additional information about outcome trajectory due to development alone. The NH participants are matched to AHL/SSD participants on age, gender and parent education. Post-implant performance with a CI alone is expected to outperform pre-implant performance with a HA. The study evaluates the effectiveness of bimodal hearing defined as a CI in the poor ear and a HA in the better ear for AHL or a CI in the poor ear and normal hearing in the better ear for SSD compared to pre-implant performance. The study examines factors contributing to CI outcomes.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
for AHL/SSD Participants:
Cochlear implantation of a device from one of the three manufacturers available in the US.
Time frame: Pre-Implant and 12 months post-implant
Poor ear alone CNC monosyllabic word recognition in quiet with the CI alone compared to pre-implant with a HA.
Time frame: Pre-implant and 15 months post-implant
Speech reception thresholds (SRTs) for understanding words in noise in the bimodal condition (CI + HA for AHL; CI + NH ear for SSD) post-implant compared to the pre-implant best aided condition.
Time frame: 15 months post-implant
Post-implant speech reception thresholds (SRTs) for understanding words in noise in the bimodal condition (CI + HA for AHL; CI + NH ear for SSD) compared to the better ear alone condition.
Time frame: 5 visits pre-implant over a minimum of 4 months and the 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15 month post-implant visits
The trajectory of speech reception thresholds (SRT) for understanding noise throughout the CI Phase (5 visits post-implant) in the bimodal condition is compared to the trajectory throughout the HA Phase (5 visits pre-implant) in the best aided condition.
Time frame: Pre-implant and 12 months post-implant
FM tone sound field threshold levels in the poor ear alone with a CI compared to pre-implant threshold levels with a HA
Time frame: Pre-implant and 15 months post-implant
RMS error scores for a sound localization task in the bimodal condition (CI + HA for AHL; CI + NH ear for SSD) post-implant compared to the pre-implant best aided condition.
Time frame: Pre-implant and 12 months post-implant
CNC monosyllabic word recognition at a soft level in the bimodal condition (CI + HA for AHL; CI + NH ear for SSD) post-implant compared to the pre-implant best aided condition.
Time frame: Pre-implant and 15 months post-implant
Questionnaire completed by parents and participants (when age appropriate). Ratings post-implant are compared to pre-implant ratings.
Time frame: Pre-implant and 15 months post-implant
Questionnaire completed by parents and participants (when age appropriate). Ratings post-implant are compared to pre-implant ratings.
Time frame: Pre-implant and 15 months post-implant
Questionnaire completed by parents and participants (when age appropriate). Ratings post-implant are compared to pre-implant ratings.
Time frame: 15 months post-implant
Post-implant RMS error scores for the sound localization task are compared in the bimodal condition to the better ear alone condition.
Time frame: 12 months post-implant
Post-implant word recognition scores at soft levels are compared in the bimodal condition to the better ear alone condition.
Washington University School of Medicine
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06930170
Asymmetric Hearing Loss, Ear Diseases
Paris, France
View Trial DetailsNCT06734039
Asymmetric Hearing Loss, Cochlear Implants
Iowa City, Iowa, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02203305
Asymmetric Hearing Loss, Ear Diseases
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07028619
Asymmetric Hearing Loss, Cochlear Implant Recipients
Meridian, Idaho, United States
View Trial Details