Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT07744516

Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of an Ozonated Oil in Atopic Dermatitis

This clinical trial is designed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of a topical ozonated vegetable oil formulation in paediatric patients with mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis. The study follows a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled design and compares clinical progression, as assessed using the SCORAD (Scoring Atopic Dermatitis) index, quality of life, as measured using the IDQoL (Infants' Dermatitis Quality of Life Index), and various safety and cosmetic acceptability outcomes over a 14-day follow-up period. In addition to conventional clinical efficacy endpoints, the study includes responder analyses and quality-of-life assessments to provide a more comprehensive characterisation of the potential therapeutic benefit of ozonated oil in this population.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

1 month–6 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Alcantarilla-Sangonera Primary Care Centre, Alcantarilla, Spain

Loading trial locations.

About this study

A pilot, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial is conducted to evaluate the clinical efficacy, safety, and tolerability of a topical formulation based on ozonated vegetable oil in paediatric patients with mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis.

The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the clinical efficacy of topical ozonated oil in reducing the severity of paediatric atopic dermatitis, as quantified by the change in the total SCORAD score from baseline to the follow-up visits, from both a continuous perspective, based on the absolute change in SCORAD, and a clinical-response perspective.

The secondary objectives are:

To evaluate the impact of treatment on atopic dermatitis-related quality of life using the IDQoL questionnaire.

To evaluate the proportion of patients achieving clinically meaningful improvements in SCORAD according to the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) criteria.

To quantify the need for rescue medication. To assess the safety and tolerability of the active formulation. To evaluate cosmetic acceptability and subjective satisfaction with the treatment.

The study follows a parallel, two-arm design, with participants randomly assigned to receive either the active formulation or placebo. The active treatment consists of a topical ozonated vegetable oil formulation, whereas the control group receives a placebo formulation containing the same non-ozonated lipid vehicle. The use of the same vehicle in both groups ensures cosmetic and organoleptic comparability between the formulations, thereby supporting the maintenance of blinding throughout the trial.

The study is conducted under double-blind conditions, such that neither the clinical investigators nor the patients' parents or legal guardians are aware of treatment allocation during follow-up. Formulation coding and randomisation assignments remain concealed until completion of the statistical analysis.

The total clinical follow-up period is 14 days, with assessments performed at three time points:

Baseline visit (Day 0) Follow-up visit (Day 7 ± 1) Final visit (Day 14 ± 2)

The data collected at each study visit are summarised below:

Baseline visit

Demographic variables Clinical and atopic history Dermatological history Baseline SCORAD assessment IDQoL questionnaire

Day 7 visit

Interim SCORAD assessment IDQoL questionnaire Adverse events Treatment adherence Rescue medication use

Day 14 visit

Final SCORAD assessment Adverse events Treatment adherence Rescue medication use Treatment satisfaction, tolerability, and cosmetic acceptability variables

The study is conducted at the paediatric outpatient clinics of Clínica Quirón Valencia, Torrevieja Hospital, and the Novelda and Alcantarilla-Sangonera Primary Care Centres.

The investigational product, corresponding to the active treatment, is Ozoaqua® Ozonated Oil. The comparator product, corresponding to placebo, consists of a formulation prepared using the same lipid vehicle but without ozonation. The oil is applied topically once every 12 hours, corresponding to two applications per day, to the affected areas throughout the 14-day study follow-up period. Although the management of atopic dermatitis during the study is based on the topical application of either the active product or the comparator, the use of rescue medication is permitted at the investigators' discretion.

The study population comprises paediatric patients with a clinical diagnosis of active mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis. Eligible patients are between 1 month and 6 years of age and are required to meet clinical criteria consistent with atopic dermatitis, as determined by specialist medical assessment.

The total study sample comprises 50 patients.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female patients aged between 1 month and 6 years.
  • Clinical diagnosis of atopic dermatitis.
  • Active mild or moderate flare.
  • Baseline SCORAD score between 20 and 50 points.
  • Availability of parents or legal guardians to administer the treatment and complete the follow-up period.
  • Written informed consent provided by the parents or legal guardians.

Exclusion criteria

  • Severe atopic dermatitis.
  • Clinically relevant active skin infection.
  • Recent use of systemic immunosuppressive treatments.
  • Serious concomitant diseases.
  • Known hypersensitivity to any component of the formulation.
  • Clinical conditions that could interfere with the interpretation of the therapeutic response.

Treatment and study plan

ozonated oil

Other

Ozoaqua® Ozonated Oil

non-ozonated oil

Other

Same lipid vehicle, without ozonation.

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in SCORAD score from baseline at days 7 and 14

    Time frame: 14 days

    The primary efficacy outcome is the total SCORAD (Scoring Atopic Dermatitis) score, a widely validated instrument for the clinical assessment of atopic dermatitis.

    Three SCORAD assessments are performed throughout the study: at baseline, day 7, and day 14.

    The SCORAD index comprises three domains:

    • SCORAD A: Extent

    This domain assesses the percentage of body surface area affected. In patients younger than 2 years of age, age-specific anatomical weightings for the paediatric population are applied.

    • SCORAD B: Intensity

    This domain includes the clinical assessment of six dermatological signs: erythema, oedema, oozing/crusting, excoriation, lichenification, and xerosis.

    Each item is scored on an ordinal scale from 0 to 3.

    • SCORAD C: Subjective symptoms

    This domain assesses the perceived severity of pruritus and sleep disturbance, each quantified on a scale from 0 to 10.

    • The total SCORAD score is calculated using the standard formula:

    SCORAD = A/5 + (7 × B)/2 + C

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number and percentage of patients achieving a SCORAD response at days 7 and 14 relative to baseline

    Time frame: 14 days

    A response is defined as a reduction in SCORAD of ≥8.7 points from baseline, in accordance with the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) reported by Schram et al. for this scale. An MCID responder is defined as a patient who achieved this reduction in score

  2. Change in IDQoL score from baseline at day 7

    Time frame: 7 days

    Quality of life is assessed using the Infants' Dermatitis Quality of Life Index (IDQoL), a questionnaire specifically designed for paediatric atopic dermatitis. Two IDQoL assessments are performed during the study: at baseline and on day 7.

    The questionnaire comprises 10 items covering pruritus, sleep disturbance, mood, feeding, play and activities, treatment-related problems, dressing, and bathing.

    Each item is scored on an ordinal scale from 0 to 3. The total score ranges from 0 to 30 points, with higher scores indicating greater impairment in quality of life.

  3. Number and percentage of patients requiring rescue medication during the 14-day follow-up period

    Time frame: 14 days

    During the study, the use of rescue treatments for the management of recurrences or new flares of atopic dermatitis is recorded at the investigators' discretion. Rescue treatment is defined as the use of any medication for the management of flares, particularly topical corticosteroids and oral antihistamines.

  4. Number of days of rescue medication use during the 14-day follow-up period.

    Time frame: 14 days

    During the study, the use of rescue treatments for the management of recurrences or new flares of atopic dermatitis is recorded at the investigators' discretion. Rescue treatment is defined as the use of any medication for the management of flares, particularly topical corticosteroids and oral antihistamines. In addition to the type and dose of medication, the number of days of administration is recorded.

Other outcomes

  1. Adverse events during the follow-up period

    Time frame: 14 days

    The adverse event analysis includes:

    • Incidence of adverse events
    • Severity
    • Causal relationship
    • Time course
  2. Treatment-related tolerability and cosmetic acceptability

    Time frame: 14 days

    Treatment-related tolerability and cosmetic acceptability are assessed at the end of the follow-up period, at the Day 14 visit

    • Treatment-related problems

    Potential problems attributed to the treatment are assessed using a questionnaire with four response categories: "not at all", "a little", "a lot", and "very much".

    • Investigator's overall satisfaction with the treatment

    The investigator's satisfaction with the treatment is assessed on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates "not at all satisfied" and 10 indicates "very satisfied".

    • Evaluation of the formulation

    Parental satisfaction with formulation-related aspects is assessed in terms of: (1) pleasant texture, (2) ease of absorption, (3) increased hydration, (4) soothing and relief, and (5) immediate effect. Each aspect is rated on a scale from 0 to 5, where 0 indicates "none" and 5 indicates "a great deal".

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Laboratorios Ozoaqua

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of an Ozonated Oil in Atopic Dermatitis

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Aug 4, 2026
Registry last updated
Aug 4, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.