ozonated oil
OtherOzoaqua® Ozonated Oil
NCT Number: NCT07744516
This clinical trial is designed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of a topical ozonated vegetable oil formulation in paediatric patients with mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis. The study follows a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled design and compares clinical progression, as assessed using the SCORAD (Scoring Atopic Dermatitis) index, quality of life, as measured using the IDQoL (Infants' Dermatitis Quality of Life Index), and various safety and cosmetic acceptability outcomes over a 14-day follow-up period. In addition to conventional clinical efficacy endpoints, the study includes responder analyses and quality-of-life assessments to provide a more comprehensive characterisation of the potential therapeutic benefit of ozonated oil in this population.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me1 month–6 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Alcantarilla-Sangonera Primary Care Centre, Alcantarilla, Spain
A pilot, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial is conducted to evaluate the clinical efficacy, safety, and tolerability of a topical formulation based on ozonated vegetable oil in paediatric patients with mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis.
The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the clinical efficacy of topical ozonated oil in reducing the severity of paediatric atopic dermatitis, as quantified by the change in the total SCORAD score from baseline to the follow-up visits, from both a continuous perspective, based on the absolute change in SCORAD, and a clinical-response perspective.
The secondary objectives are:
To evaluate the impact of treatment on atopic dermatitis-related quality of life using the IDQoL questionnaire.
To evaluate the proportion of patients achieving clinically meaningful improvements in SCORAD according to the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) criteria.
To quantify the need for rescue medication. To assess the safety and tolerability of the active formulation. To evaluate cosmetic acceptability and subjective satisfaction with the treatment.
The study follows a parallel, two-arm design, with participants randomly assigned to receive either the active formulation or placebo. The active treatment consists of a topical ozonated vegetable oil formulation, whereas the control group receives a placebo formulation containing the same non-ozonated lipid vehicle. The use of the same vehicle in both groups ensures cosmetic and organoleptic comparability between the formulations, thereby supporting the maintenance of blinding throughout the trial.
The study is conducted under double-blind conditions, such that neither the clinical investigators nor the patients' parents or legal guardians are aware of treatment allocation during follow-up. Formulation coding and randomisation assignments remain concealed until completion of the statistical analysis.
The total clinical follow-up period is 14 days, with assessments performed at three time points:
Baseline visit (Day 0) Follow-up visit (Day 7 ± 1) Final visit (Day 14 ± 2)
The data collected at each study visit are summarised below:
Baseline visit
Demographic variables Clinical and atopic history Dermatological history Baseline SCORAD assessment IDQoL questionnaire
Day 7 visit
Interim SCORAD assessment IDQoL questionnaire Adverse events Treatment adherence Rescue medication use
Day 14 visit
Final SCORAD assessment Adverse events Treatment adherence Rescue medication use Treatment satisfaction, tolerability, and cosmetic acceptability variables
The study is conducted at the paediatric outpatient clinics of Clínica Quirón Valencia, Torrevieja Hospital, and the Novelda and Alcantarilla-Sangonera Primary Care Centres.
The investigational product, corresponding to the active treatment, is Ozoaqua® Ozonated Oil. The comparator product, corresponding to placebo, consists of a formulation prepared using the same lipid vehicle but without ozonation. The oil is applied topically once every 12 hours, corresponding to two applications per day, to the affected areas throughout the 14-day study follow-up period. Although the management of atopic dermatitis during the study is based on the topical application of either the active product or the comparator, the use of rescue medication is permitted at the investigators' discretion.
The study population comprises paediatric patients with a clinical diagnosis of active mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis. Eligible patients are between 1 month and 6 years of age and are required to meet clinical criteria consistent with atopic dermatitis, as determined by specialist medical assessment.
The total study sample comprises 50 patients.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Ozoaqua® Ozonated Oil
Same lipid vehicle, without ozonation.
Time frame: 14 days
The primary efficacy outcome is the total SCORAD (Scoring Atopic Dermatitis) score, a widely validated instrument for the clinical assessment of atopic dermatitis.
Three SCORAD assessments are performed throughout the study: at baseline, day 7, and day 14.
The SCORAD index comprises three domains:
This domain assesses the percentage of body surface area affected. In patients younger than 2 years of age, age-specific anatomical weightings for the paediatric population are applied.
This domain includes the clinical assessment of six dermatological signs: erythema, oedema, oozing/crusting, excoriation, lichenification, and xerosis.
Each item is scored on an ordinal scale from 0 to 3.
This domain assesses the perceived severity of pruritus and sleep disturbance, each quantified on a scale from 0 to 10.
SCORAD = A/5 + (7 × B)/2 + C
Time frame: 14 days
A response is defined as a reduction in SCORAD of ≥8.7 points from baseline, in accordance with the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) reported by Schram et al. for this scale. An MCID responder is defined as a patient who achieved this reduction in score
Time frame: 7 days
Quality of life is assessed using the Infants' Dermatitis Quality of Life Index (IDQoL), a questionnaire specifically designed for paediatric atopic dermatitis. Two IDQoL assessments are performed during the study: at baseline and on day 7.
The questionnaire comprises 10 items covering pruritus, sleep disturbance, mood, feeding, play and activities, treatment-related problems, dressing, and bathing.
Each item is scored on an ordinal scale from 0 to 3. The total score ranges from 0 to 30 points, with higher scores indicating greater impairment in quality of life.
Time frame: 14 days
During the study, the use of rescue treatments for the management of recurrences or new flares of atopic dermatitis is recorded at the investigators' discretion. Rescue treatment is defined as the use of any medication for the management of flares, particularly topical corticosteroids and oral antihistamines.
Time frame: 14 days
During the study, the use of rescue treatments for the management of recurrences or new flares of atopic dermatitis is recorded at the investigators' discretion. Rescue treatment is defined as the use of any medication for the management of flares, particularly topical corticosteroids and oral antihistamines. In addition to the type and dose of medication, the number of days of administration is recorded.
Time frame: 14 days
The adverse event analysis includes:
Time frame: 14 days
Treatment-related tolerability and cosmetic acceptability are assessed at the end of the follow-up period, at the Day 14 visit
Potential problems attributed to the treatment are assessed using a questionnaire with four response categories: "not at all", "a little", "a lot", and "very much".
The investigator's satisfaction with the treatment is assessed on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates "not at all satisfied" and 10 indicates "very satisfied".
Parental satisfaction with formulation-related aspects is assessed in terms of: (1) pleasant texture, (2) ease of absorption, (3) increased hydration, (4) soothing and relief, and (5) immediate effect. Each aspect is rated on a scale from 0 to 5, where 0 indicates "none" and 5 indicates "a great deal".
Laboratorios Ozoaqua
Industry
Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of an Ozonated Oil in Atopic Dermatitis
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07730788
Atopic Dermatitis (AD), Atopic Dermatitis (Eczema)
Romans-sur-Isère, Drôme, France
View Trial DetailsNCT07659756
Atopic Dermatitis (AD), Atopic Dermatitis (Eczema)
Zurich, Switzerland
View Trial DetailsNCT07568665
Atopic Dermatitis (AD), Atopic Dermatitis (Eczema)
Romans-sur-Isère, Drôme, France
View Trial DetailsNCT07448363
Atopic Dermatitis, Atopic Dermatitis (AD)
San José, Provincia de San José, Costa Rica
View Trial Details