Implantation of coflex™ after surgical decompression
DeviceThe device will be implanted after surgical decompression in patients with spinal stenosis.
NCT Number: NCT01316211
A 2 year comparative evaluation of clinical outcome in the treatment of degenerative spinal stenosis with concomitant low back pain by decompression with and without additional stabilization using the coflex® Interlaminar Technology
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me40 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Oberlinklinik Potsdam Orthopädische Fachklinik, Potsdam, Brandenburg, Germany
The coflex® implant for interlaminar stabilization has been in clinical use for more than 10 years and is CE-certified according to the standards and approved in the United States.
This was a randomized multicenter study to collect prospective data for potential improvement in the therapy of low back pain during the treatment of spinal stenosis. The study was conducted in Germany.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
If necessary additional decompression in the adjacent segment(s) may be performed avoiding any instability in the affected segment.
In addition the following may exist (but is not obligatory):
Exclusion criteria
Any of the following will exclude a subject from the study:
The device will be implanted after surgical decompression in patients with spinal stenosis.
Surgical decompression in patients with spinal stenosis without stabilization by an additional implant
Time frame: Baseline, 3, 12, and 24 months
The ODI, also known as the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire is a questionnaire providing information on back and leg pain and the affects on managing everyday life by dividing questions into 10 sections. For this study, the questions on sexual activity will not be asked. The total possible score for each section is 0-5. The scores are then converted percentages ranging from 0% (minimal disability) to 100% (maximum possible disability).
Time frame: 2 years
Assess significant migration, defined as > 5mm by x-ray images (point of reference is the tip of the U-portion implant identified on the corresponding x-ray image).
Time frame: Baseline, 3, 12, and 24 months
Improvement of the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for low back pain (on the 100mm scale) compared to control group. 0 = no pain and 100 = worst pain imaginable.
Time frame: Baseline, 3, 12, and 24 months
Improvement of the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for leg pain (on the 100mm scale) compared to control group. 0 = no pain and 100 = worst pain imaginable.
Time frame: Baseline, 3, 12, and 24 months
Sensory deficits will be assessed at nerves roots from L3, L4, L5, and S1. Grading score ranges from 1=absent to 3=normal.
Time frame: 2 years
During this test, a patient has to walk on a treadmill (speed 1.8 km/h [12]) for 15 minutes (450 m) on a 0 degree ramp incline. It will be assessed time to first symptoms, time to severe symptoms and nature of symptoms (leg weakness, leg pain, back pain, or generalized fatigue, other). A time of zero will be recorded when symptoms were present at onset. The examination will be stopped after 15 minutes or at the onset of severe symptoms.
Definition of severe symptoms is: The level of discomfort that would make patients stop their activities in usual life situations.
It is assumed that patients with additional back pain will have more problems in managing the complete walking distance and therefore may stop the walking distance test before the endpoint at 15 minutes
Time frame: 2 years
Number of Participants that experience adverse events related to the operative site from each group.
Time frame: 2 years
Treatment failure is defined as any secondary intervention, severe adverse event or other parameters that define the device as ineffective or not safe. The following events/outcomes were defined as treatment failures: wound revisions, patients with trauma requiring surgical intervention, disc hernia or dura repair, and/or pain management.
Time frame: Baseline, 3, 12, and 24 months
The symptom severity scale ranges from 0 to 5 where a higher score indicates a worse outcome. Percentage of the maximum reported score for the symptom severity scale was calculated at baseline and 24 months and change in percentage score is reported in the Outcome Measure data table.
Time frame: Baseline, 3, 12, and 24 months
The symptom severity scale ranges from 0 to 5 where a higher score indicates a worse outcome. Percentage of the maximum reported score for the symptom severity scale was calculated at baseline and 24 months and change in percentage score is reported in the Outcome Measure data table.
Time frame: Baseline, Day 0 (Surgery), 3, 12, and 24 months
Muscle strength will be assessed on right/left muscle strength at 6 groups of leg muscles. Score ranges from 0=contraction to 5=normal.
Time frame: Baseline, Day 0 (Surgery), 3, 12, and 24 months
The straight leg raise or a Laségue Test is used to assess a participant's low back pain. A positive outcome is identified if a participant experiences low back pain when the straight leg is at a certain angle (0-90 degrees). A negative test suggests a likely different cause for back pain. The test is performed on both right and left legs.
Time frame: 2 years
Epidural injections at up to 24 months
Time frame: Baseline, Day 0 (Surgery), 3, 12, and 24 months
Trendelenburg's sign was used to assess the neurological status of a subject. The test was taken for both the left and right sides and assessed as not present/absent (no= corresponding with a value of 1) or present (yes= corresponding to a value of 2). The average of each patient's worst side was calculated. Mean values closer to 1 indicate more patients with an absent Trendelenburg's sign, and a decrease in the mean change indicates more patients improving from a present to absent Trendelenburg's sign.
Time frame: Baseline, Day 0 (Surgery), 3, 12, and 24 months
Ilio sacral join affection test was used to assess the neurological status of a subject. The test was taken for both the left and right sides and assessed as not present/absent (no= corresponding with a value of 1) or present (yes= corresponding to a value of 2). The average of each patient's worst side was calculated. Mean values closer to 1 indicate more patients with an absent llio sacral joint affection and a decrease in the mean change indicates more patients improving from a present to absent sacral join affection.
Paradigm Spine
Industry
Comparative Evaluation of Clinical Outcome in the Treatment of Degenerative Spinal Stenosis With Concomitant Low Back Pain by Decompression With and Without Additional Stabilization Using the Coflex™ Interlaminar Technology
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06233617
Bone Diseases, Erector Spinae Plane Block
Poznan, Poznań, Poland
View Trial DetailsNCT02348645
Back Pain, Bone Diseases
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT06750874
Back Injuries, Back Injury
Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04379921
Bone Diseases, Musculoskeletal Diseases
Palo Alto, California, United States
View Trial Details