NCT Number: NCT02348645
Decompression vs. Fusion for Stable Degenerative Spondylolisthesis
The purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility of a full-scale multicenter randomized, controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of two surgical treatments for a condition associated with lumbar spinal stenosis called degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Both treatments are currently used, but individual surgeons use different selection criteria for each treatment and use the procedures at different rates. The two procedures are decompression with fusion (the most common surgical procedure for spondylolisthesis) and midline-sparing decompression alone (which is also a standard treatment, but is not as widely used for treating spondylolisthesis). The investigators plan to collect the evidence on the following:
1. The feasibility of the trial protocol, and 2. Preliminary data on the effectiveness of each treatment.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeKey information
Conditions
Age range
50 year and older
Sex eligibility
All sexes
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Not applicable
Primary location
Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Who can participate
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
- Patients deemed to be surgical candidates with focal (1-2 level) lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) and associated stable degenerative spondylolisthesis with the following characteristics:
- a clinical history of back, buttock and leg pain with walking or standing that is improved when lying, sitting or bending forward
- a clinical history of leg symptoms that are greater than or equal to back symptoms with walking or standing, and
- greater than 6 months of symptoms with failed conservative care
- aged 50 or over
- sufficient fluency in English or French to provide informed consent and complete questionnaires with or without the need of an interpreter
Exclusion criteria
- Greater than 25% listhesis or spinal instability as demonstrated by motion (>5mm of translation) on flexion extension radiographs or non-loaded (MRI/CT or supine x-rays) to loaded imaging (standing radiograph)
- Presence of kyphosis (>0 degrees at the affected level or globally), degenerative scoliosis (>10 degree using the Cobb method) with rotatory or lateral listhesis on preoperative x-rays
- Clinical history of osteoporotic fracture or chronic oral steroid use
- Previous posterior lumbar spinal surgery (excluding prior microdiscectomy)
- Patients who have evidence of neurological disorders that affect physical function (e.g. peripheral neuropathy), neuromuscular disorders (e.g. multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's etc.) or systemic illness (e.g. inflammatory arthritis) that affects physical function
Treatment and study plan
Spinal decompression
ProcedurePrimary outcomes
-
Number of patients recruited
Time frame: 1 year
-
Number of eligible patients
Time frame: 1 year
-
Reasons for refusal to consent
Time frame: 1 year
-
Proportion of patients who adhere to randomized allocation
Time frame: 2 years
-
Number of patients refusing to consent due to blinding
Time frame: 1 year
-
Blinding status
Time frame: 1.5 months post-surgery
Patient's assessment of which treatment they received
-
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
Time frame: 6-18 weeks, 6 months (optional), 12 months, and 24 months post-surgery
10-item patient-reported questionnaire measuring disability related to low back pain. Each item has six response options ranging from 0 to 5; the responses are summed and rescaled so 0 indicates no disability and 100 indicates extreme disability.
-
Proportion of patients who receive randomized allocation
Time frame: 2 years
-
Number of patients refusing to consent due to randomization
Time frame: 1 year
-
Number, type and severity of adverse events
Time frame: End of hospital stay (average 6.5 days post-surgery)
Secondary outcomes
-
Short-Form 12 scores: Physical Function, Bodily Pain, Physical Component Summary
Time frame: Baseline; 6-18 weeks, 6 months (optional), 12 months, and 24 months post-surgery
12-item patient-reported questionnaire for general health status based on the SF-36 Health Survey (version 2). Measures eight health domains, each scored so 0 is the worst and 100 is the best possible score: general health (GH), physical function (PF), bodily pain (BP), role limitations due to physical problems (RP), role limitations due to emotional problems (RE), mental health (MH), social functioning (SF), and energy/fatigue (VT). The domain scores can be aggregated into Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores, also scaled so 0 is the worst and 100 is the best possible score. This study will focus primarily on the Physical Function domain, the Bodily Pain domain, and the Physical Component Summary score.
-
Euro-QoL health utility index
Time frame: Baseline; 6-18 weeks, 6 months (optional), 12 months, and 24 months post-surgery
Patient-reported questionnaire for general health state which includes five items (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) and a visual analog scale for self-rated health state. Using an existing U.S. population-based value set, responses will be converted to the corresponding health utility index (1.0=perfect health and 0.0=death).
-
Patient Health Questionnaire-9 score
Time frame: Baseline
Patient-reported questionnaire that measures severity of depression symptoms. It is scored from 0 to 27, with the following interpretation: 0-4=no symptoms, 5-9=minimal symptoms; 10-14=mild/minor depression or dysthymia; 15-19=moderate major depression; 20-27=severe major depression.
-
Costs incurred by patients
Time frame: monthly from 1.5 to 12 months post-surgery; 24 months post-surgery
-
Hospital cost
Time frame: End of hospital stay (average 6.5 days post-surgery)
-
Healthcare services used
Time frame: Referral to 1 year post-surgery
Other Ontario Health Insurance Plan (OHIP)-billed services used
Sponsors and collaborators
Lead sponsor
University Health Network, Toronto
Other
Registry information
Official study title
Decompression Alone vs. Decompression and Instrumented Fusion for the Management of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Associated With Stable Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: A Pragmatic Randomized Clinical Pilot Trial
Important dates
- Study start
- 2015
- Primary completion
- 2023
- Study completion
- 2023
- First posted
- Jan 28, 2015
- Registry last updated
- May 7, 2026
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Related clinical trials
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT): Degenerative Spondylolisthesis With Spinal Stenosis
NCT00000409
Back Pain, Bone Diseases
Oakland, California, United States
View Trial DetailsPerioperative ACT for Preventing CPSP
NCT06750874
Back Injuries, Back Injury
Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsQuintex® Follow-up After One Year Minimum
NCT04489394
Bone Diseases, Cervical Spondylosis
Koblenz, Germany
View Trial DetailsPASS OCT® Post-market Clinical Follow-up
NCT02931279
Back Injuries, Bone Diseases
Marseille, France
View Trial Details