Department of Neurology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100730, China
NCT Number: NCT06837038
The aim of this clinical trial was to determine whether rhythmic auditory stimulation is effective in treating gait disorders in patients with post-stroke hemiplegia, primary Parkinson's disease, and various parkinsonism syndromes. The main questions it aims to answer are:
Does rhythmic auditory stimulation increase walking speed in patients with gait disorders? To determine whether rhythmic auditory stimulation is effective in treating gait disorders, researchers will compare a gait rhythmometer with an active control that does not receive rhythmic stimulation.
Participants will:
Gait training was conducted once a day for 15 minutes for 7 consecutive days Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fmri) was performed before and after treatment Feedback on subjective improvement at the end of the 7-day treatment
Interested in participating?
Request Info50 year–80 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100730, China
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
For post-stroke hemiplegia
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
For primary Parkinson's disease (PD)
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
For Parkinsonism syndrome:
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The intervention group was treated with a gait rhythm device under the supervision of the researchers. The complete gait training was conducted once a day for 15 minutes for 7 consecutive days. Each patient wore inertial sensors at both ankles during gait training to collect gait information during walking.
The control group received gait training without rhythmic auditory stimulation under the supervision of the researchers. The complete gait training was conducted once a day for 15 to 20 minutes for 7 consecutive days. Each patient wore inertial sensors at both ankles during gait training to collect gait information during walking.
Time frame: 10 days
The difference between the gait speed measured on the third day after the completion of the seven gait sessions and the baseline gait speed
Time frame: 10 days
The difference between the stride length (left and right) measured on the third day after the completion of the seven gait sessions and the baseline stride length.
Time frame: 10 days
The difference between the stride frequency (left and right) measured on the third day after the completion of the seven gait sessions and the baseline stride frequency.
Time frame: 10 days
The difference between the stride speed (left and right) measured on the third day after the completion of the seven gait sessions and the baseline stride speed.
Time frame: 10 days
The difference between the swing speed (left and right) measured on the third day after the completion of the seven gait sessions and the baseline swing speed.
Time frame: 10 days
The difference between the standing phase (left and right) measured on the third day after the completion of the seven gait sessions and the baseline standing phase.
Time frame: 10 days
The difference between the turn time measured on the third day after the completion of the seven gait sessions and the baseline turn time.
Time frame: 10 days
All subjects were asked about their subjective feelings using a uniform questionnaire, including the following questions: Did the patient's gait problems improve after 7 days of treatment? If there has been improvement, in what ways? (Step speed, stride length, symmetry, turn time, etc.)
Time frame: 10 days
At baseline and on the third day after completion of the 7-day gait treatment, 3T resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) was performed to compare the changes of local neural activity, including amplitude of low frequency fluctuation (ALFF) and functional connectivity density (FCD).
YiCheng Zhu
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07014696
Hand Functionality, Hemiplegia
Istanbul, Bahçeşir, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT02892760
Hemiparesis Due to Stroke, Hemiplegia Due to Stroke
Houston, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04925622
Autonomic Nervous System Diseases, Basal Ganglia Diseases
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04974034
Akinesia, Basal Ganglia Diseases
Bobigny, Seine Saint Denis, France
View Trial Details