Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07501013

Clinical Outcomes of Arthroscopic Surgeries for Shoulder and Knee Sports Injuries

This observational study aims to evaluate the long-term recovery and clinical outcomes of patients undergoing minimally invasive (arthroscopic) surgeries for sports-related shoulder and knee injuries.

Sports injuries, such as ligament tears, meniscus damage, and rotator cuff tears, are common and can significantly impact a person's daily life and ability to return to sports. While surgery is an effective treatment, the recovery process and final outcomes can vary greatly from person to person.

Researchers will follow patients who are already scheduled for routine shoulder or knee surgery at the study center. By collecting detailed information about the patient's initial injury, the specific surgical techniques used by the doctor, and the patient's recovery progress over two years, the study hopes to identify which factors lead to the best healing and functional outcomes.

Participants will be asked to complete standard questionnaires about their joint function and pain levels before their surgery, and again at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after surgery. The study is strictly observational; it will not change the standard medical care, surgical plan, or rehabilitation routine the patients receive.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

8 year–80 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine

Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Yan Xiong, Doctor

CONTACT

[email protected]

0571-663553

About this study

Despite significant advancements in arthroscopic techniques for shoulder and knee sports injuries (e.g., anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, meniscus repair, and rotator cuff repair), postoperative clinical outcomes and return-to-sport rates remain highly variable among individuals. This variability is likely influenced by a complex interplay of patient baseline characteristics, specific tear morphologies, individualized intraoperative surgical choices (e.g., mechanical augmentation strategies, remnant preservation), and post-operative rehabilitation.

This single-center, prospective observational cohort study is designed to systematically collect high-granularity clinical data from patients undergoing elective arthroscopic shoulder and knee surgeries. The study will construct a structured registry that integrates highly detailed intraoperative objective assessments with standardized Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs).

The primary objective is to evaluate the mid-to-long-term functional outcomes and utilize multivariable regression models to identify independent predictive factors for success or sub-optimal recovery. Additionally, the study involves the ethical collection of discarded intraoperative tissues (e.g., synovial fluid, degenerative tendon/cartilage fragments) and residual routine blood samples. This will establish a biobank to support future "clinical-basic" translational research exploring the microenvironment of tissue healing.

By establishing this comprehensive real-world database, the investigators aim to provide robust evidence to help resolve ongoing clinical controversies in sports medicine and ultimately optimize personalized surgical and rehabilitation protocols.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age >= 8 years.
  • No gender restrictions.
  • Definitive diagnosis of shoulder or knee sports injuries or related joint conditions.
  • Scheduled to undergo elective, standard-of-care surgery at the study center (procedures include but are not limited to: arthroscopic meniscus repair/meniscectomy, cartilage repair, cruciate ligament reconstruction, high tibial osteotomy [HTO], unicompartmental knee arthroplasty [UKA], arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, shoulder stabilization, and shoulder arthroplasty).
  • Clear consciousness, with the ability to read, understand, and communicate.
  • Willing and able to comply with postoperative follow-up requirements.
  • Voluntarily signed the written informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients requiring emergency surgery due to acute, severe trauma (e.g., open fractures, polytrauma).
  • Coexisting severe neurological or psychiatric diseases, or cognitive impairment that prevents understanding of the informed consent or cooperation with follow-up.
  • Patients in an involuntary state (e.g., under coercion).
  • Refusal to sign the informed consent form or refusal to participate in the study.
  • Currently participating in other interventional clinical trials that may confound or affect the clinical outcomes of this study.

Treatment and study plan

Standard of Care Shoulder Arthroscopy

Procedure

Routine, minimally invasive arthroscopic surgical procedures tailored to the patient's specific shoulder pathology, followed by standard postoperative rehabilitation. This is strictly observational; no experimental procedures are introduced.

Standard of Care Knee Arthroscopy

Procedure

Routine, minimally invasive arthroscopic surgical procedures tailored to the patient's specific knee pathology, followed by standard postoperative rehabilitation. This is strictly observational; no experimental procedures are introduced.

Primary outcomes

  1. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) for Joint Function

    Time frame: Preoperative baseline, 2 weeks, 1 month, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively.

    Validated questionnaires evaluate function, symptoms, and QoL based on the specific cohort.

    • Higher scores indicate better outcomes (better function / less symptoms):

    Score 0 to 100: IKDC, Pedi-IKDC, KOOS, ACL-RSI, WOMET, Kujala AKPS, BPII 2.0, ASES, Rowe score, and EQ-5D VAS.

    Score 0 to 48: OSIS (Oxford Shoulder Instability) and OSS (Oxford Shoulder). Score 0 to 10: Tegner Activity Scale (higher = higher activity level). Score 0 to 16: Marx Activity Scale (higher = higher activity level).

    • Lower scores indicate better outcomes (less pain / less disability):

    Score 0 to 10: VAS and NRS (for pain). Score 0 to 100: Quick-DASH (upper extremity disability).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Incidence of Postoperative Complications

    Time frame: From the date of surgery up to 2 years postoperatively.

    Tracking the occurrence rate of any adverse events related to the surgery, including but not limited to surgical site infection, deep vein thrombosis (DVT), severe joint stiffness requiring manipulation, and graft failure or re-rupture requiring revision surgery.

  2. Pain Intensity Assessed by Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    Time frame: Preoperative baseline, 2 weeks, 1 month, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively.

    Assessment of joint pain at rest and during activity using a 10-point Visual Analog Scale, where 0 represents "no pain" and 10 represents "worst imaginable pain."

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Yan Xiong, Doctor

CONTACT

[email protected]

0571-663553

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Clinical Outcomes and Associated Factors Following Arthroscopic Surgeries for Shoulder and Knee Sports Injuries: A Prospective Cohort Study

Acronym: SK-COHORT

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2046
Study completion
2046
First posted
Mar 30, 2026
Registry last updated
Apr 13, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.