Complife Italia S.r.l
San Martino Siccomario, Pavia, 27028, Italy
NCT Number: NCT07573592
This study evaluates the repairing efficacy of a cosmetic cream containing Picea abies extract compared to a placebo (cream without extract) and a benchmark product. The trial involves 60 healthy subjects (aged 18-60) with atopy-prone and sensitive skin.
Over a 21-day period, the primary objective is to measure improvements in skin barrier function via transepidermal water loss (TEWL) and skin moisturization. A dermatologist will also assess soothing effects by evaluating skin dryness, redness, and itching sensations. Secondary objectives include measuring skin inflammation markers (TNFα, TSLP, and TARC) and subject-perceived efficacy through self-assessment questionnaires.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–60 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
San Martino Siccomario, Pavia, 27028, Italy
This is a multi-site, randomized, placebo-controlled, and benchmark-controlled clinical trial designed to evaluate the repairing and soothing efficacy of a cosmetic cream containing Picea abies extract. The study is conducted on 60 healthy male and female subjects (66 enrolled to account for a 10% dropout rate) aged 18 to 60 years who exhibit atopy-prone and sensitive skin.
Subjects are randomized into three parallel groups (N=20 per group):
Test Product: Atopic cream with Picea abies extract.
Placebo: Atopic cream without Picea abies extract.
Benchmark: A commercially available reference cream.
The intervention consists of applying the assigned product twice daily to clean, dry skin on the face and body for a duration of 21 days.
Clinical and instrumental evaluations are performed at baseline (T0) and after 21 days (T21). Instrumental assessments include the measurement of Transepidermal Water Loss (TEWL) and skin moisturization levels. Clinical evaluations are conducted by a dermatologist to assess physical signs (dryness, desquamation, redness) and functional signs (stinging, itching, burning, and tightness). Additionally, skin inflammation markers (TNFα, TSLP, and TARC) are dosed to evaluate the biological effect on skin barrier inflammation. Subjective efficacy is captured through a standardized self-assessment questionnaire.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Cosmetic cream containing Picea abies extract. Applied twice daily on clean and dry skin of the face and body for 21 days.
Other names: Abilar Atopic
Base cosmetic formulation identical to the test product but without the active Picea abies resin extract. Applied twice daily on clean and dry skin of the face and body for 21 days.
Other names: Base formulation
Commercially available emollient cream (Aqualan-L) used as an active comparator. Applied twice daily on clean and dry skin of the face and body for 21 days.
Other names: Benchmark emollient
Time frame: Baseline (T0) and Day 21 (T21±2)
Transepidermal water loss (TEWL) on the cheekbones will be measured using a Tewameter. The outcome will be reported as the change from baseline to Day 21. Values are expressed in g/m²/h.
Time frame: Baseline (T0) and Day 21 (T21±2)
Transepidermal water loss (TEWL) on the forearms will be measured using a Tewameter. The outcome will be reported as the change from baseline to Day 21. Values are expressed in g/m²/h.
Time frame: Baseline (T0) and Day 21 (T21±2)
Skin moisturization on the cheekbones will be evaluated using a Corneometer. The outcome will be reported as the change from baseline to Day 21. Values are expressed in corneometric units (c.u.).
Time frame: Baseline (T0) and Day 21 (T21±2)
Skin moisturization on the forearms will be evaluated using a Corneometer. The outcome will be reported as the change from baseline to Day 21. Values are expressed in corneometric units (c.u.).
Time frame: Baseline (T0) and Day 21 (T21±2)
Skin dryness will be assessed using the study-defined 5-point clinical score: 0 = none, 1 = very mild, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, and 4 = severe. Higher scores indicate greater severity. The outcome will be reported as the change from baseline to Day 21.
Time frame: Baseline (T0) and Day 21 (T21±2)
Skin desquamation will be assessed using the study-defined 5-point clinical score: 0 = none, 1 = very mild, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, and 4 = severe. Higher scores indicate greater severity. The outcome will be reported as the change from baseline to Day 21.
Time frame: Baseline (T0) and Day 21 (T21±2)
Itching sensation will be assessed using the study-defined clinical score: 0 = absent itching, 1 = very mild itching, 2 = mild itching, 3 = moderate itching, 4 = severe itching. The outcome will be reported as change from baseline to Day 21.
Time frame: Baseline (T0) and Day 21 (T21±2)
Skin redness will be assessed using the study-defined clinical score: 0 = absent redness, 1 = very mild redness, 2 = mild redness, 3 = moderate redness, 4 = severe redness. The outcome will be reported as change from baseline to Day 21.
Time frame: Baseline (T0) and Day 21 (T21±2)
Stinging sensation will be assessed using the study-defined 5-point clinical score: 0 = none, 1 = very mild, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, and 4 = severe. Higher scores indicate greater severity. The outcome will be reported as the change from baseline to Day 21.
Time frame: Baseline (T0) and Day 21 (T21±2)
Burning sensation will be assessed using the study-defined 5-point clinical score: 0 = none, 1 = very mild, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, and 4 = severe. Higher scores indicate greater severity. The outcome will be reported as the change from baseline to Day 21.
Time frame: Baseline (T0) and Day 21 (T21±2)
Skin tightness will be assessed using the study-defined 5-point clinical score: 0 = none, 1 = very mild, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, and 4 = severe. Higher scores indicate greater severity. The outcome will be reported as the change from baseline to Day 21.
Repolar Pharmaceuticals Oy
Industry
Clinical-Instrumental Evaluation of the Efficacy of Two Cosmetic Products in Comparison: Placebo Controlled Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05934422
Allergy, Atopic Dermatitis
Auckland, New Zealand
View Trial DetailsNCT00757562
Atopy, Chronic Disease
View Trial DetailsNCT02929277
Asthma, Atopy
View Trial DetailsNCT01489293
Allergic Rhinitis, Asthma
Kfar Saba, Israel
View Trial Details