Cairo University
Cairo, Egypt
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT07402720
Gingival hyperpigmentation, particularly of melanin origin, can pose significant aesthetic concerns, especially among patients with a high smile line. Several depigmentation techniques have been proposed to manage this condition, including scalpel surgery, electrosurgery, cryotherapy, lasers, and various rotary instruments. Recently, minimally invasive rotary tools such as ceramic burs and polishing brushes have gained interest due to their potential to deliver controlled ablation with reduced postoperative discomfort and healing complications.
Ceramic soft tissue trimming burs are specially designed to remove superficial pigmented gingival layers with minimal trauma. However, these instruments may still generate heat and cause a degree of tissue damage. On the other hand, polishing brushes, traditionally used for surface finishing and stain removal, have recently been explored for soft tissue applications due to their gentle action and adaptability.
Despite their increasing use, there is insufficient comparative clinical evidence on the efficacy, healing outcomes, and patient-centered experiences between these two modalities in gingival depigmentation. A split-mouth randomized controlled trial design offers the advantage of eliminating inter-individual variability. Thus, this study aims to assess and compare the clinical effectiveness of the polishing brush and ceramic trimming bur for gingival depigmentation in terms of pigment reduction, healing outcomes, postoperative pain, and recurrence.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year–40 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Cairo, Egypt
Location status: Recruiting
This study is designed as a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial with a parallel intraoral comparison between two treatment modalities:
The trial will adhere to CONSORT guidelines, with baseline data collection followed by standardized clinical evaluations at predefined follow-up intervals to assess changes in gingival thickness and other relevant soft tissue parameters.
The study will be conducted at the Department of Oral Medicine and Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry - Cairo University, Egypt.
Participants will be recruited from the outpatient clinic of the same department.
Population:
Systemically healthy patients with gingival hyperpigmentation.
Intervention:
Depigmentation using a polishing brush.
Comparison:
Depigmentation using ceramic soft tissue trimming bur.
Treatment:
Healthy, nonsmokers with moderate to severe gingival hyperpigmentation in both arches will be assigned for Polishing Brush Compared To Ceramic Soft Tissue Trimming Bur • Study Groups:
Preoperative evaluation:
Polishing brush In the test group, gingival depigmentation will be performed using a polishing brush specifically adapted for soft tissue application.
After administering local anesthesia, a silicon carbide or rubber-based polishing brush will be attached to a low-speed handpiece. The pigmented gingival epithelium will be gently abraded in a circular motion under light pressure until the superficial pigmented layer is removed and uniform pink gingiva is visible. Continuous irrigation with sterile saline will be used to prevent heat generation and ensure visibility. The operator will take care not to injure the underlying connective tissue. No periodontal dressing will be applied. Postoperative instructions will include gentle oral hygiene, avoiding hot or spicy foods, and use of 0.12% chlorhexidine mouthwash for 1 week.
Ceramic bur In the control group, ceramic soft tissue trimming burs will be used to perform gingival depigmentation. After achieving local anesthesia, a flame- or round-shaped ceramic bur will be attached to a low-speed contra-angle handpiece. The bur will be used in a brushing motion to carefully remove the pigmented epithelial layer without applying excessive pressure. The clinician will maintain light, controlled strokes to avoid damaging the underlying lamina propria. As with the polishing brush technique, continuous irrigation with saline will be provided to cool the tissue and improve visibility. Once the pigmented areas are cleared and a healthy pink gingival color is achieved, the procedure will be concluded without any periodontal dressing. Postoperative care will follow the same protocol as the polishing brush group.
Patient-Reported Outcomes:
Oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) will be assessed using the validated Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) questionnaire, which measures the functional, psychological, and social impacts of oral conditions on everyday life. The OHIP-14 consists of 14 items covering seven conceptual domains: functional limitation, physical pain, psychological discomfort, physical disability, psychological disability, social disability, and handicap. Participants will complete the OHIP-14 at baseline and again three months post-treatment to assess changes in self-perceived oral health status and quality of life. Incorporating this patient-reported outcome measure enables a comprehensive evaluation of treatment effectiveness beyond clinical indicators alone.
Postoperative instructions and follow up:
All patients will receive standardized postoperative care instructions immediately following the depigmentation procedure. Patients will be advised to avoid trauma or mechanical irritation to the treated area for at least 1-2 weeks. Toothbrushing in the surgical sites will be restricted to the use of an ultrasoft toothbrush, and gentle brushing techniques will be demonstrated. The use of chemical plaque control agents such as 0.12% chlorhexidine mouthwash will be prescribed twice daily for 1-2 weeks to aid plaque control and reduce the risk of postoperative infection.
Patients will be instructed to refrain from consuming hot, spicy, or abrasive foods for the first few days to minimize discomfort and irritation. Analgesics will be prescribed as needed for pain management, according to individual patient tolerance and medical history.
Postoperative Follow-Up :
Patients will be recalled for clinical evaluation at 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively. At each follow-up visit, the surgical sites will be examined for signs of healing, presence of infection, inflammation, or any adverse tissue reactions. Re-epithelialization, color match with surrounding gingiva, patient comfort, and recurrence of pigmentation will be assessed and documented.
Professional plaque control will be reinforced at each visit, and oral hygiene instructions will be reiterated as necessary. Any complications or patient-reported concerns will be addressed promptly.
If re-pigmentation is noted during the follow-up period, its extent and pattern will be recorded for further analysis. Digital photographs may be taken at baseline and each follow-up visit to monitor healing and pigmentation changes objectively.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
gingival depigmentation will be performed using a polishing brush specifically adapted for soft tissue application. After administering local anesthesia, a silicon carbide or rubber-based polishing brush will be attached to a low-speed handpiece. The pigmented gingival epithelium will be gently abraded in a circular motion under light pressure until the superficial pigmented layer is removed and uniform pink gingiva is visible. Continuous irrigation with sterile saline will be used to prevent heat generation and ensure visibility. The operator will take care not to injure the underlying connective tissue. No periodontal dressing will be applied. Postoperative instructions will include gentle oral hygiene, avoiding hot or spicy foods, and use of 0.12% chlorhexidine mouthwash for 1 week.
ceramic soft tissue trimming burs will be used to perform gingival depigmentation. After achieving local anesthesia, a flame- or round-shaped ceramic bur will be attached to a low-speed contra-angle handpiece. The bur will be used in a brushing motion to carefully remove the pigmented epithelial layer without applying excessive pressure. The clinician will maintain light, controlled strokes to avoid damaging the underlying lamina propria. As with the polishing brush technique, continuous irrigation with saline will be provided to cool the tissue and improve visibility. Once the pigmented areas are cleared and a healthy pink gingival color is achieved, the procedure will be concluded without any periodontal dressing. Postoperative care will follow the same protocol as the polishing brush group.
Time frame: Baseline, 1 Week, 1 month and at 3 months
Dummett Oral Pigmentation Index (DOPI). This is an ordinal index that categorizes pigmentation on a 4-point scale: 0 = no pigmentation, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = heavy pigmentation.
Time frame: At Baseline, and at 3 months.
Evaluated using a Visual Analog Score based questionnaire reflecting the Oral Health Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL), adapted from OHIP-1 to OHIP-14, measuring satisfaction with esthetic and functional outcomes following treatment. containing seven first-order factors (dimensions: functional limitation, physical pain, psychological discomfort, physical disability, psychological disability, social disability, and handicap) This instrument has a 5-point Likert-type response scale (0: never, 1: hardly ever, 2: occasionally, 3: fairly often, 4: very often).
Time frame: Perioperative. From the start of the depigmentation procedure until the end of hemostasis and final inspection.
Measured in minutes using a digital stopwatch from the start of the depigmentation procedure until the end of hemostasis and final inspection.
Time frame: Day 1, Day 3, 1 week, Day 10
Assessed using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS), where participants will rate their pain perception on a continuous scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain).
Time frame: Baseline, 1 Week, 1 month and at 3 months
Assessed using the Takashi Index, a 3-grade ordinal scale scoring the extent of pigmentation as follows:0 = no pigmentation, 1 = isolated spots, and 2 = continuous ribbon. This will be recorded at each time point to assess reduction in pigmentation area.
Time frame: 1 week, 3 months
Evaluated using the Healing Index of Landry, Turnbull, and Howley (1988), a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (very poor) to 5 (excellent), based on clinical observations of tissue color, bleeding, granulation, and epithelialization.
Time frame: 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months.
Measured using the Melanin Pigmentation Index (MPI) at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively, scored as 0 = no pigmentation and 1 = presence of pigmentation.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Cairo University
Other
Clinical Effectiveness Of Polishing Brush Compared to Ceramic Soft Tissue Trimming Bur In Gingival Depigmentation: A Randomized Controlled Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07513727
Gingival Hyperpigmentation, Gingival Melanin Pigmentation
Cairo, Cario Governorate, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT07672587
Gingival Hyperpigmentation, Oral Pigmentation
Samsun, Atakum, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07520266
Gingival Hyperpigmentation
Can Tho, Vietnam
View Trial DetailsNCT07357883
Gingival Hyperpigmentation, Laser Depigmentation
Cairo, Cairo Governorate, Egypt
View Trial Details