The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
Columbus, Ohio, 43210, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
Aladdin A Alqaisi, MS
CONTACT
Allie Garvin, BS
CONTACT
Andrew Grossbach, MD
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
NCT Number: NCT04041583
This is a prospective study to assess fusion rates and cervical sagittal parameters following posterior cervical arthrodesis procedures supplemented with CIS. Data will be collected from medical records for up to 730 days after surgery. Data to be collected will be demographic, preoperative clinical information, surgical details, and radiographic information. Patients will also undergo a non-standard of care CT scan 2 years after surgery.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Columbus, Ohio, 43210, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Aladdin A Alqaisi, MS
CONTACT
Allie Garvin, BS
CONTACT
Andrew Grossbach, MD
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Background and Rationale
Posterior cervical fusion surgeries are performed for degenerative cervical conditions, cervical deformity, cervical tumors, and cervical trauma. They are preferred over an anterior approach when the pathology is located posterior to the spinal cord or when multiple levels must be addressed. Degenerative cervical spondylosis contributes to loss of disc height, facet arthropathy and hypertrophy, and retrolisthesis of the vertebral bodies, all of which can lead to foraminal stenosis, or narrowing around the exiting nerve roots. This is often accompanied by loss of cervical lordosis. During a posterior fusion operation, the restoration of cervical lordosis can worsen this foraminal stenosis and lead to iatrogenic radiculopathy with and estimated incidence between 2.4-50%. Cadaveric studies have shown the insertion of interfacet spacers in the cervical spine increase foraminal height, and serve to indirectly decompress the exiting nerve roots. Another common complication of cervical spine surgery is C5 palsy, which has been reported in 4.6% of patient undergoing posterior cervical spine decompressive procedures, including decompression and fusion. Patients suffering from iatrogenic C5 palsy have significantly increased recovery times, and often require additional services such as imaging studies (CT, MRI) and increased need for physical and occupational therapy, thus increasing costs. Given the ability to decompress the neuroforamen with interfacet spacers, they could potentially be an effective technique for reducing the incidence of C5 palsy.
The use of cervical interfacet spacers (CIS; CORNERSTONE Facet MicroGrafts, Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) is a relatively novel technique shown to be useful for posterior fusion to address symptomatic pseudoarthrosis (fusion failure) after anterior cervical arthrodesis. CIS have a relatively large osteoconductive surface area and are placed under tension in the interfacet space, which together favorably influence bony fusion. Current techniques for posterior cervical fusion rely on graft placement using bone extenders placed in the posterolateral space, which is not under a compressive load. Wolfe's law dictates that certain amounts of loading of bone grafts is required to achieve bony fusion. Therefore, the use of CIS could potentially increase fusion rates after posterior cervical arthrodesis procedures and reduce or eliminate the need for use of bone graft extenders. Reassuringly, radiologic studies have shown that despite the increase in foraminal height, the use of CIS does not lead to loss of cervical lordosis.
Study Objective
To date, there have been no prospective studies examining the use of cervical interfacet spacers. The investigators propose to undertake a prospective study to assess fusion rates and cervical sagittal parameters following posterior cervical arthrodesis procedures supplemented with CIS.
Primary Outcome Measures The primary outcome measures will include (i) the rate of cervical fusion measured on post-operative radiographs and CT scans performed at 2-years and (ii) cervical sagittal alignment parameters as measured on post-operative radiographs.
Secondary Outcome Measures The secondary outcome measures will include post-operative patient reported outcomes including NRS, NDI, and SF-36 RAND. As well, all neurological adverse events will be prospectively collected.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The use of Cervical Interfacet Spacers is a relatively novel technique shown to be useful for posterior fusion to address symptomatic pseudoarthrosis (fusion failure) after anterior cervical arthrodesis [2]. CIS have a relatively large osteoconductive surface area and are placed under tension in the interfacet space, which together favorably influence bony fusion [2].
Other names: (CIS; CORNERSTONE Facet MicroGrafts, Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN)
Time frame: 2-Years
Cervical Fusion Measured on Post-Operative Radiographs and CT scans
Time frame: 2-Years
Cervical Sagittal Alignment Parameters measured on post-operative radiographs
Time frame: 2-Years
Numerical Rating Score for Pain from 0-10 where lower values represent a better outcome
Time frame: 2-Years
Neck Disability Index from 0-100% where lower values represent a better outcome
Time frame: 2-Years
Quality of Life Measures from 0-100 where higher values represent a better outcome
Time frame: 2-Years
Adverse Events
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Aladdin A Alqaisi, MPH
CONTACT
Allie Garvin, BS
CONTACT
Ohio State University
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04623593
Bone Diseases, Bone Diseases, Developmental
Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
View Trial DetailsNCT04640896
Back Pain, Bone Diseases
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07556978
Bone Diseases, Bone Diseases, Developmental
Misterbianco, Catania, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT04770571
Bone Diseases, Bone Diseases, Developmental
Orange, California, United States
View Trial Details