Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT06534398

Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Implant-supported Prostheses With Cantilever Extensions After 10 Years of Function

A retrospective examination was performed on patients who had received treatment with dental implants supporting a prosthesis with a cantilever extension for at least 10 years of function.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, School of Dentistry

Thessaloniki, 54124, Greece

About this study

The successful use of osseointegrated dental implants in replacing missing teeth has been adequately documented, with multiple studies reporting long-term success exceeding 10 years of function. However, there is still insufficient evidence in cases where availability of adequate bone precludes ideal placement of implants. Examples of cases like these include the posterior maxilla when pneumatization of the maxillary sinus does not allow for placement of implants, or areas of thin bone that would require extensive guided bone regeneration (GBR) techniques and increase patient morbidity. In such cases the use of fixed dental prostheses (FDPC's) with cantilever extension has been suggested in lieu of sinus lift techniques or GBR procedures. However, few studies have actually addressed the long-term success of such FDPC's, both from a surgical and a prosthetic standpoint, especially in posterior areas of the mandible and maxilla where loading forces are expected to be higher.

Two studies addressed this issue in the early 2000's with successful outcomes reported for an observation period of 5 years. Others reported similar outcomes after a mean observation period of 5.6 years. The 5th Consensus Conference of the European Association of Osseointegration (EAO) suggested that such treatment can be recommended to patients, albeit with little available evidence and limited follow-up of cases. Recent studies have delved further into this issue, offering longer follow-up data of more than 10 years of function. They included both 2 unit FDP's anchored on one implant and 3 unit FDP's anchored on two implants with cantilever extensions. They concluded that this treatment modality is a reliable option with long-term stability and few complications, mainly prosthetic.

The aim of this retrospective study is to offer further data on the long-term success and complications when at least two dental implants are used to support a FDPC in the posterior areas of both jaws, after at least 10 years of function.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

The inclusion criteria were as follows:

  • Age 18 years and over
  • Systemic health or controlled medical conditions
  • Periodontal health, either no periodontal disease, or previously treated periodontal disease and under a supportive periodontal maintenance (SPT) program
  • Smokers were included but encouraged to enter a smoking cessation program
  • Patients with bruxism or parafunctional habits were included.

The exclusion criteria were as follows:

  • Uncontrolled medical conditions
  • Active uncontrolled periodontal disease
  • Inability to present for the reevaluation appointment
  • Immediate implant placement
  • Cantilever units that were part of full-arch restorations
  • Cantilever units that were connected to a single implant
  • Non-existent opposing dentition

Treatment and study plan

Dental implant prosthesis with cantilever extension

Device

A retrospective study on the radiographic and clinical findings of implant-supported dental prostheses with cantilever extensions in place and function for at least 10 years

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean bone loss

    Time frame: 10 years at least

    Mean bone loss measured from the difference of the bone levels at time of implant placement compared to the time of examination

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mean Probing Depth

    Time frame: 10 years at least

    The average probing depth at the time of examination at each implant site

  2. Biologic complications

    Time frame: 10 years at least

    Recording of biologic complications around implants (health, peri-implant mucositis, peri-implantitis

  3. Technical complications

    Time frame: 10 years at least

    Recording of prosthetic complications encountered at the dental prostheses with cantilever extensions

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Aristotle University Of Thessaloniki

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Implant-supported Prostheses With Cantilever Extensions. A Retrospective Study With a Follow-up of at Least 10 Years.

Acronym: Cantilevers

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2024
First posted
Aug 2, 2024
Registry last updated
Aug 7, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.