West China Hospital of Stomatology
Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, China
NCT Number: NCT04706078
To evaluate a cross-shaped incision technique to thick-gingiva and thin-gingiva patients treated with implant-supported fixed prosthesis.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeAll sexes
Observational
Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, China
Objective: To evaluate a cross-shaped incision technique to thick-gingiva and thin-gingiva patients treated with implant-supported fixed prosthesis. Methods and Materials: 55 patients received cross-shaped incision were assigned into thick-gingiva group (29 cases) and thin-gingiva group (26 cases). Follow-up examination was carried out 3 and 12 months after final restoration. Clinical and radiographic evaluation including gingival papilla height, modified plaque index, modified sulcus bleeding index, periodontal depth, and crestal marginal bone level were utilized.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The biotype of gingival was also determined by periodontal probe.
Time frame: Between June 2018 and June 2020.
Presence/absence of papilla height was assessed visually
Time frame: Between June 2018 and June 2020.
plaque accumulation around the marginal peri-implant tissue was assessed
Time frame: Between June 2018 and June 2020.
the bleeding tendency of the marginal peri-implant tissue was evaluated
Time frame: Between June 2018 and June 2020.
PD was assessed at the mid-buccal, mid-oral, mesial and distal aspects of each implant with a standard periodontal probe, and final value was determined by the average of four aspects
Time frame: Between June 2018 and June 2020.
Gingival margin level was assessed by calculating the vertical distance between the most apical point of gingival margin at the buccal aspect of the crown and line connecting the peak of the adjacent mesial and distal natural teeth
Time frame: Between June 2018 and June 2020.
the landmarks of first bone-implant contact (fBIC) and implant shoulder (IS) were used for measurements. fBIC-IS was defined as the vertical distance the first bone-implant contact to implant shoulder, and the distance was assessed at the mesial and distal aspect of implant, respectively. When the marginal crestal bone was located coronal to the IS, a positive (+) value was given, where a negative (-) value when located apically to the IS, the value was deemed as zero when IS and fBIC coincided.
Wen Luo
Other
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of a Cross-shaped Incision Technique to Thick-gingiva and Thin-gingiva Patients Treated With Implant-supported Fixed Prosthesis
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05190614
Clinical and Radiographic Effect, Implant
Chengdu, Sichuan, China
View Trial DetailsNCT07200011
Avitaminosis, Clinical and Radiographic Effect
Al Mansurah, Dakahlia Governorate, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT07697066
3D Printed Hybrid Resin, Healing
Tanta, El-Gharbia, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT06964529
Thin Gingiva, Thin Gingival Biotype
Malatya, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details