Bevacizumab
DrugOther names: Avastin
NCT Number: NCT00911820
There is no clear standard of care for metastatic stomach or esophageal cancer in the United States. The purpose of this research study is to determine the differences between two regimens of chemotherapy; Arm A: PCA (Cisplatin, Irinotecan and Bevacizumab) and Arm B: TPCA (Docetaxel, Cisplatin, Irinotecan and Bevacizumab). Docetaxel, Cisplatin, and Irinotecan are traditional chemotherapy drugs. Bevacizumab is an antibody (a protein that attacks a foreign substance in the body). Bevacizumab is believed to stop the formation of new blood vessels that carry nutrients to tumors. Both of the chemotherapy regimens (PCA and TPCA) have been studied in patients with esophageal and gastric cancer, and we are trying to determine if one regimen will keep your cancer from growing and improve how long you can live.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
Secondary
Exploratory:
DESIGN:
This trial was designed to compare 7-month progression-free survival between arms. The hypothesis was that TPCA would have superior outcome over PCA (70% vs 50%). With 40 eligible patients per arm followed for 1 year there was 80% power to detect a hazard ratio of 0.48 using the log-rank test at a one-sided type I error rate of 5%. Stratification factors were ECOG performance status 0/1 vs 2 and site of primary tumor (gastric vs GE junction/esophageal).
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Other names: Avastin
Other names: Platinol-AQ, Platinol
Other names: Camptosar
Other names: Taxotere, Docefrez
Time frame: Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and every 2 cycles on treatment; Relevant for this endpoint was disease status at 7 months of follow-up.
7-month progression-free survival is the probability of patients remaining alive and progression-free at 7-months from study entry estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods. Per RECIST 1.0 criteria: progressive disease (PD) is at least a 20% increase in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions. PD for the evaluation of non-target lesions is the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of non-target lesions.
Time frame: Patients in the study cohort were followed up to approximately 2.5 years as of this analysis.
Overall survival is defined as the time from study entry to death or date last known alive and estimate using Kaplan-Meier (KM) methods.
Time frame: Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and every 2 cycles on treatment; Treatment duration was a median of 5 cycles (up to approximately 1 year) in this study cohort as of this analysis..
Best response on treatment was based on RECIST 1.0 criteria: Complete Response (CR) is complete disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR) is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference baseline sum LD. Both require confirmation no fewer than 4 weeks apart. CR/PR assumes at a minimum incomplete response/stable disease (SD) for the evaluation of non-target lesions and absence of new lesions. Progressive disease (PD) is at least a 20% increase in the sum of longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions. PD for the evaluation of non-target lesions is the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of non-target lesions. Stable disease is defined as any condition not meeting above criteria.
Time frame: Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and every 2 cycles on treatment; Treatment duration was a median of 5 cycles (up to approximately 1 year) in this study cohort as of this analysis.
Overall response (OR) rate was defined as achieving partial response (PR) or complete response (CR) based on RECIST 1.0 criteria on treatment. Per RECIST 1.0 for target lesions, CR is complete disappearance of all target lesions and PR is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference baseline sum LD. To be assigned a status of CR or PR, changes in tumor measurements must be confirmed by repeat assessments performed no fewer than 4 weeks after the response criteria are first met. PR or better overall response assumes at a minimum incomplete response/stable disease (SD) for the evaluation of non-target lesions and absence of new lesions.
Time frame: Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and every 2 cycles on treatment; Patients were followed for up to 2.5 years as of this analysis.
Progression-free survival based on the Kaplan-Meier method is defined as the duration of time from study entry to documented disease progression (PD) requiring removal from the study or death. Patients alive and progression-free at last follow-up are censored. Per RECIST 1.0 criteria: progressive disease is at least a 20% increase in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions. PD for the evaluation of non-target lesions is the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of non-target lesions.
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Other
A Randomized, Multicenter, Phase II Trial of Cisplatin, Irinotecan and Bevacizumab (PCA) vs. Docetaxel, Cisplatin, Irinotecan and Bevacizumab (TPCA) in Metastatic Esophageal and Gastric Cancer
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02689284
Digestive System Diseases, Digestive System Neoplasms
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03652077
Adenocarcinoma, Adenoma
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03515356
Colonic Diseases, Colorectal Cancer
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00215462
Adenocarcinoma Of Esophagus, Digestive System Diseases
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial Details