Chordate System S200 + CT100 (active treatment)
DeviceChordate S200 + CT100 (active treatment) gives Kinetic Oscillation Stimulation for 15 minutes to each nostril and by that giving an effect on the autonomic nervous system (ANS).
NCT Number: NCT02243865
The purpose of this pilot study is to evaluate the performance of the Chordate System, in terms of the prophylactic effect and tolerability of treatment in patients diagnosed with migraine.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Stortorgets neurologmottagning, Helsingborg, Sweden
This was a prospective, interventional, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multi-center clinical investigation of a medical device system.
A pilot study in which patients with frequent migraine attacks received intranasal KOS or placebo using the Chordate System S200 on two occasions.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Chordate S200 + CT100 (active treatment) gives Kinetic Oscillation Stimulation for 15 minutes to each nostril and by that giving an effect on the autonomic nervous system (ANS).
Chordate S200 + CT100 (placebo) is used in the same way as Active treatment, but no Kinetic Oscillation Stimulation is given. Catheter is not inflated and no vibration is given.
Time frame: From baseline (28 days pre-treatment) to visit 4 (day 98, ± 7 days)
A diary was used where patients added information each day on experienced migraine (yes/no). Baseline was defined as any migraine days from Day -29 until Day -1, i.e. the day before first treatment (Day 1). If full time period for baseline or the post treatment period was not documented, number of migraine days was recalculated with the formula:
Number of migraine days = (Number of migraine days x 28) / Number of days observed
If data was missing for any patient for more than 14 days during any period of interest, that patient was excluded from analysis.
The change from baseline in number of migraine days was calculated as follows:
Change = number of migraine days per four weeks for the 3 months post treatment period - number of migraine days per four weeks of the baseline period
As the difference between the post treatment period and baseline is presented, negative numbers indicate a post treatment decrease in number of migraine days.
Time frame: From baseline (28 days pre-treatment) to visit 4 (day 98, ± 7 days)
A diary was used where patients added information each day on experienced migraine (yes/no). Baseline was defined as any migraine days from Day -29 until Day -1, i.e. the day before first treatment (Day 1). If the full time period for either baseline or post treatment period was not documented number of migraine days was recalculated with the formula:
Number of migraine days = (Number of migraine days x 28) / Number of days observed
If data was missing for any patient for more than 14 days during any period of interest, that patient was excluded from the analysis of that time period.
The change from baseline in number of migraine days was calculated as follows:
Change = number of migraine days per four weeks for applicable post treatment period - number of migraine days per four weeks of the baseline period
As the difference between applicable post treatment period and baseline is presented, negative numbers indicate a post treatment decrease in number of migraine days.
Time frame: From baseline (28 days pre-treatment) to visit 4 (day 98, ± 7 days)
"Responder" defined as a patient with 50% or greater decrease in the number of migraine days per four weeks, for the 1st, 2nd and 3rd month post treatment vs baseline
Time frame: From baseline (day ≥ - 28 days) to visit 4 (day 98, ± 7 days)
A diary was used where patients added information on the maximum pain intensity on each day according to a 4-point categorical scale (none, mild, medium, severe).
The maximum documented pain intensity for each patient during each post treatment time period was tabulated for the active treatment and placebo groups.
Time frame: From baseline (28 days pre-treatment) to visit 4 (day 98, ± 7 days)
A diary was used where patients added information each day on the number of hours with migraine. The median migraine duration in hours per day was determined for each patient, for each post treatment time period. Baseline for each patient was defined as the median number of migraine hours/day from Day -29 until Day -1, i.e. the day before the first treatment (Day 1).
The change in median migraine hours/day from baseline, for each defined post treatment time period, was then determined and the mean change is presented.
As the differences between applicable post treatment period and baseline is presented, negative numbers indicate a post treatment decrease in number of migraine hours/day.
Time frame: From baseline (28 days pre-treatment) to visit 4 (day 98, ± 7 days)
Time frame: At visit 4 day 98, ± 7 days
Patient satisfaction, evaluated by a clinician, was measured using 8-point clinical global impression (CGI) scores on an improvement scale (CGI-I: compared to condition at baseline, how much has changed: 0 = Not assessed, 1 = Very much improved, 2 = Much improved, 3 = Minimally improved, 4 = No change, 5 = Minimally worse, 6 = Much worse, 7 = Very much worse).
Time frame: From baseline (day 0, visit 2) to visit 4 (day 98, ± 7 days)
Number of Participants with a Change in Disease-specific Quality of Life, as measured by EQ-5D-3L, from Baseline (day 0, visit 2 before first treatment) to End of the Three Month Investigation Duration. EQ-5D-3L uses 5 categorical dimensions - motility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression, each classified as improved, no change or worsened.
Time frame: From baseline (day 0, visit 2) to visit 4 (day 98, ± 7 days)
Disease-specific quality of life, as measured by EQ-VAS, at baseline (day 0, visit 2 before first treatment) and at end of the three month study duration after treatment. The EQ VAS is a standard vertical 20 cm visual analogue scale (similar to a thermometer) for recording an individual's rating for their current health-related quality of life state, with a score from 0-100, where a higher score indicates greater pain intensity.
Chordate Medical
Industry
A Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind, Multi-center Clinical Investigation to Evaluate the Prophylactic Effect and Tolerability of Intranasal Kinetic Oscillation Stimulation (KOS) Using the Chordate System S200 in Migraine Patients
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04530110
Brain Diseases, Central Nervous System Diseases
Aurora, Colorado, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07699549
Brain Diseases, Central Nervous System Diseases
Madrid, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT07720895
Brain Diseases, Central Nervous System Diseases
Athens, Greece
View Trial DetailsNCT06158737
Brain Diseases, Central Nervous System Diseases
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
View Trial Details