free gingival graft + gelatin sponge
ProcedureFree gingival graft surgery and application of gelatin sponge to the palatal wound
NCT Number: NCT07072546
This study aims to evaluate the effects of chitosan and injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) on wound healing at the donor site following free gingival graft (FGG) procedures. The palatal donor area often experiences delayed healing and postoperative discomfort, motivating the search for effective biomaterials to enhance recovery and reduce patient morbidity. Although various approaches have been investigated, the combined application of chitosan and i-PRF has not yet been explored in this context.
The study examines three patient groups treated at the periodontology departments of Çukurova and Biruni University: one with gelatin sponge (control), one with chitosan, and one with chitosan infused with i-PRF. Parameters such as pain (VAS), bleeding, burning sensation, dietary changes, epithelialization (PEHI score), and color match were assessed over a 2-month follow-up.
The findings are expected to provide insights into whether i-PRF-enhanced chitosan offers superior healing outcomes and greater patient comfort compared to conventional methods.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey (Türkiye)
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Free gingival graft surgery and application of gelatin sponge to the palatal wound
free gingival graft surgery and application of chitosan to the palatal wound
free gingival graft surgery and application of chitosan and i-PRF to the palatal wound
Time frame: Day 7
The palatal early healing index (PEHI) measured the following 5 parameters: (1) bleeding on palpation, which was assessed with a damp cotton applicator gently rolled on the wound site; (2) incomplete epithelialization (assessed intraorally by the visual presence or absence of immediate bubble formation after hydrogen peroxide application with sterile gauze on the wound area); (3) presence of redness assessed intraorally; (4) presence of swelling assessed intraorally; and (5) presence of granulation tissue assessed intraorally. Each of the 5 parameters was assessed dichotomously (yes/no).
Time frame: Day 14
The palatal early healing index (PEHI) measured the following 5 parameters: (1) bleeding on palpation, which was assessed with a damp cotton applicator gently rolled on the wound site; (2) incomplete epithelialization (assessed intraorally by the visual presence or absence of immediate bubble formation after hydrogen peroxide application with sterile gauze on the wound area); (3) presence of redness assessed intraorally; (4) presence of swelling assessed intraorally; and (5) presence of granulation tissue assessed intraorally. Each of the 5 parameters was assessed dichotomously (yes/no).
Time frame: Day 28
The palatal early healing index (PEHI) measured the following 5 parameters: (1) bleeding on palpation, which was assessed with a damp cotton applicator gently rolled on the wound site; (2) incomplete epithelialization (assessed intraorally by the visual presence or absence of immediate bubble formation after hydrogen peroxide application with sterile gauze on the wound area); (3) presence of redness assessed intraorally; (4) presence of swelling assessed intraorally; and (5) presence of granulation tissue assessed intraorally. Each of the 5 parameters was assessed dichotomously (yes/no).
Time frame: Day 56
The palatal early healing index (PEHI) measured the following 5 parameters: (1) bleeding on palpation, which was assessed with a damp cotton applicator gently rolled on the wound site; (2) incomplete epithelialization (assessed intraorally by the visual presence or absence of immediate bubble formation after hydrogen peroxide application with sterile gauze on the wound area); (3) presence of redness assessed intraorally; (4) presence of swelling assessed intraorally; and (5) presence of granulation tissue assessed intraorally. Each of the 5 parameters was assessed dichotomously (yes/no).
Time frame: Day 1
The degree of pain in the patient's palatal region will be evaluated using visual analogue scale (0-no pain to 10-severe pain).
Time frame: Day 3
The degree of pain in the patient's palatal region will be evaluated using visual analogue scale (0-no pain to 10-severe pain).
Time frame: Day 7
The degree of pain in the patient's palatal region will be evaluated using visual analogue scale (0-no pain to 10-severe pain).
Time frame: Day 14
The degree of pain in the patient's palatal region will be evaluated using visual analogue scale (0-no pain to 10-severe pain).
Time frame: Day 28
The degree of pain in the patient's palatal region will be evaluated using visual analogue scale (0-no pain to 10-severe pain).
Time frame: Day 56
The degree of pain in the patient's palatal region will be evaluated using visual analogue scale (0-no pain to 10-severe pain).
Time frame: Day 1
Patients will be given a form and asked to record this informations daily.
Time frame: Day 7
The degree of difficulty in chewing in the patient's palatal region will be evaluated using visual analogue scale (0-no to 10-severe).
Time frame: Day 14
The degree of difficulty in chewing in the patient's palatal region will be evaluated using visual analogue scale (0-no to 10-severe).
Time frame: Day 28
The degree of difficulty in chewing in the patient's palatal region will be evaluated using visual analogue scale (0-no to 10-severe).
Time frame: Day 56
The degree of difficulty in chewing in the patient's palatal region will be evaluated using visual analogue scale (0-no to 10-severe).
Time frame: Day 2
Patients will be given a form and asked to record this information daily.
Time frame: Day 3
Patients will be given a form and asked to record this information daily.
Time frame: Day 4
Patients will be given a form and asked to record this information daily.
Time frame: Day 5
Patients will be given a form and asked to record this information daily.
Time frame: Day 6
Patients will be given a form and asked to record this information daily.
Time frame: Day 7
Patients will be given a form and asked to record this information daily.
Time frame: Day 0
The width, length, and thickness of the palatal graft will be measured using a periodontal probe and recorded.
Time frame: Day 14
The color match at the donor site will be evaluated in comparison with the adjacent palatal area and the contralateral palatal arch by visual analogue scale (0-very bad to 10-excellent).
Time frame: Day 28
The color match at the donor site will be evaluated in comparison with the adjacent palatal area and the contralateral palatal arch by visual analogue scale (0-very bad to 10-excellent).
Time frame: Day 56
The color match at the donor site will be evaluated in comparison with the adjacent palatal area and the contralateral palatal arch by visual analogue scale (0-very bad to 10-excellent).
Time frame: Day 1
The degree of burning sensation in the patient's palatal region will be evaluated using visual analogue scale (0-no to 10-severe).
Time frame: Day 3
The degree of burning sensation in the patient's palatal region will be evaluated using visual analogue scale (0-no to 10-severe).
Time frame: Day 7
The degree of burning sensation in the patient's palatal region will be evaluated using visual analogue scale (0-no to 10-severe).
Time frame: Day 14
The degree of burning sensation in the patient's palatal region will be evaluated using visual analogue scale (0-no to 10-severe).
Time frame: Day 28
The degree of burning sensation in the patient's palatal region will be evaluated using visual analogue scale (0-no to 10-severe).
Time frame: Day 56
The degree of burning sensation in the patient's palatal region will be evaluated using visual analogue scale (0-no to 10-severe).
Time frame: Day 1
The degree of changes in dietary habits in the patient's palatal region will be evaluated using visual analogue scale (0-no to 10-severe).
Time frame: Day 3
The degree of changes in dietary habits in the patient's palatal region will be evaluated using visual analogue scale (0-no to 10-severe).
Time frame: Day 7
The degree of changes in dietary habits in the patient's palatal region will be evaluated using visual analogue scale (0-no to 10-severe).
Time frame: Day 14
The degree of changes in dietary habits in the patient's palatal region will be evaluated using visual analogue scale (0-no to 10-severe).
Time frame: Day 28
The degree of changes in dietary habits in the patient's palatal region will be evaluated using visual analogue scale (0-no to 10-severe).
Time frame: Day 56
The degree of changes in dietary habits in the patient's palatal region will be evaluated using visual analogue scale (0-no to 10-severe).
Biruni University
Other
Effects of Chitosan and i-PRF on Wound Healing After Palatal Graft Harvesting
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07651423
Free Gingival Graft, LASER
Gamasa, Dakhalia, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT07568327
Free Gingival Graft, Neurologic Manifestations
Istanbul, Turkey, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07439068
Free Gingival Graft
Ordu, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07199686
Cross Polarized Filter, Digital Photography
Istanbul, Fatih, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details