Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04273490

Characterising Pain, QoL, Body Composition, Arterial Stiffness, Muscles and Bones in Adult Persons With XLH and Healthy Controls

Hereditary hypophosphatemia (XLH) is a rare, inherited disease. Loss-of-function mutation in the phosphate regulating gene with homologies to endopeptidases on the X-chromosome (PHEX) results in excess fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23) production and manifests as rickets in children and osteomalacia in adults.

This study aims to characterize and measure pain, quality of life, muscle function, body composition, arterial stiffness, bone mineral density, geometry and microarchitecture in patients with XLH compared to age and gender-matched controls.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

Hereditary hypophosphatemia (XLH) is a rare, inherited disease. Loss-of-function mutation in PHEX results in excess fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23) production and manifests as rickets in children and osteomalacia in adults. FGF23 is a hormone that reduces renal phosphate reabsorption, decreases renal 1α-hydroxylase activity and increases renal 24-hydroxylase activity. As a consequence, individuals with XLH display hypophosphatemia and inadequate levels of 1,25(OH)2D (1). Therefore, conventional medical treatment of XLH aims to replace the loss with oral phosphate and activated vitamin D analogues.

The pain experienced by patients with hypophosphatemic rickets is not well characterized and needs to be addressed in order to establish the most optimal pain management in patients with XLH. The causes of pain experienced by patients with XLH are numerous: osteomalacia, enthesopathy, muscular pain, lower limb deformities, secondary arthrosis, nerve compression, and dental abscesses (3).

Quality of life (QoL) in patients with XLH is only briefly studied (4, 5). A French study found significantly decreased QoL among adult patients with XLH compared to patients with axial spondylarthritis. Especially enthesopathies were associated with a decreased QoL (4).

Increased blood levels of FGF23 are not associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease in itself (6-8). However, conventional therapy for patients with XLH may increase their cardiovascular risk since complications to the therapy such as nephrocalcinosis and hyperparathyroidism are associated with increased cardiovascular risk. Arterial stiffness may be a valuable marker of increased cardiovascular risk as it has been able to predict cardiovascular disease and mortality in different populations (10, 11). If conventional therapy increases the risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, arterial stiffness may be increased among patients with XLH which may depend on treatment status (i.e., currently treated, currently non-treated, accumulated (years of) treatment and treatment naïve).

Patients with XLH often complain about muscle fatigue and exhaustion. Muscle function in XLH is thought to be compromised by chronic hypophosphatemia, but the effect of XLH on muscle function has only been briefly evaluated (12, 13).

There are no available reports on body composition in XLH adults, but body mass index (BMI) in XLH is increased compared to controls (14).

In previous studies, examinations by high resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HRpQCT) have shown significantly larger total bone area in patients with XLH compared to individuals without XLH. However, patients with XLH have a reduced number of trabeculae and cortical thickness (15). These differences are seen regardless of treatment. When receiving conventional treatment, the cortical porosity is significantly elevated compared to patients with XLH who receive no treatment (17).

HYPOTHESES:

Primary null hypotheses:

  • There is no difference in pressure pain threshold between groups.
  • There is no difference in QoL between groups.
  • There is no difference in arterial stiffness assessed by tonometry between groups.
  • There is no difference in 24h blood pressure between groups.
  • There is no difference in muscle strength and function between groups.
  • There is no difference in body composition between groups.
  • There is no difference in bone mineral density, geometry, microarchitecture or estimated strength between groups.
  • There is no difference in presence of osteoid-volume, -surface or -thickness, osteoclast number, osteoblastic surface, osteoblast morphology or mineralization time between groups.
  • Osteomalacia is not more common in bone biopsies from patients with XLH compared to controls.

Secondary null hypotheses:

  • There is no difference in arterial stiffness within the XLH group when stratifying for treatment status.
  • There is no difference in 24h blood pressure within the XLH group when stratifying for treatment status.
  • There is no difference in bone mineral density, geometry, microarchitecture or estimated strength within the XLH group when stratifying for treatment status.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study design:

A cross-sectional study of adult persons with XLH and an age- and gender-matched control group.

Population:

The investigators plan to include 50 persons with XLH and 50 control persons without disturbances in the calcium, vitamin D or phosphate homeostasis, matched by age (+/- 2 years) and gender. For women, matching will also be performed on menopausal status.

EXAMINATIONS

Questionnaires:

Pain will be assessed by a bone-specific questionnaire (FACT-BP), a questionnaire for general pain (Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)), and one for assessment of neuropathic pain (painDETECT).

The participant's level of catastrophic thinking will be assessed with the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS). Depression and anxiety will be assessed with the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7 (GAD-7).

Quality of Life will be measured by the SF-36 questionnaire (SF36v2).

Pressure algometry:

Mechanical pressure pain over the bone will be determined as force (N) per skin area (cm2) by a handhold pressure algometer with a 1 cm2 probe (Algometer II, Somedic SenseLab AB) (18). The 1 cm2 probe will be directed perpendicularly to the skin and pressure will be applied at a constant force increase rate until the participant identifies the pressure as pain and presses a button (pressure pain threshold (PPT)). PPT will be measured over the sternum and also corresponding to the tibia 5 cm below the patella. The skin between the thumb and the index finger of the non-dominant hand will be measured as a control site.

Biochemistry:

Blood samples will be collected in a fasting state. The investigators will measure ionized calcium, phosphate, magnesium, creatinine, parathyroid hormone (PTH), vitamin D metabolites (such as 25OHD; 1,25(OH)2D; 24,25(OH)2D; 1,24,25(OH)3D), vitamin D binding protein, FGF23, sclerostin, Klotho, osteopontin, and bone turnover markers (such as CTX, P1NP, osteocalcin and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase), and relevant genes for hereditary hypophosphatemia (if not previously genetically verified).

24 hour urine will be collected for measurement of calcium, phosphate, magnesium, creatinin, sodium and potassium.

Blood pressure and arterial stiffness 24-hour blood pressure will be measured using Arteriograph24. Arterial stiffness and pulse wave analysis (PWA) will be assessed by tonometry using the SphygmoCor system (Xcel; AtCor Medical, Sydney, NSW, Australia). Participants treated with betablockers will be excluded from blood pressure and arterial stiffness measurements.

Muscle function The investigators will assess upper and lower extremity strength by handgrip strength, elbow flexion and extension, and knee flexion and extension using the adjustable dynamometer chair (Good Strength; Metitur Ltd, Finland). To assess physical function, the investigators will use the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, repeated chair rising, repeated weight lifting and 6-minutes' walk test (6 MWT).

Physical examination In order to quantify the degree of malformation of the joints in the lower extremities, the smallest distance between knees and between ankles will be measured in standing, weight bearing position.

Joint mobility The investigators will assess joint function in enthesopathy-suspected joints (neck/back, hip, knee and ankle) as well as shoulder, elbow, wrist and knee in order to discriminate between pain originating from osteomalacia or from enthesopathies.

Body composition and VFA using DXA Body composition and bone mineral density (Forearm, hip, lumbar spine and whole body) will be assessed by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) (Discovery A scanner; Hologic, USA). Obtaining vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) by DXA enables us to exclude reported back pain being due to vertebral compression fractures.

High-resolution peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography:

A HRpQCT bone scan of the dominant distal tibia and radius will be performed using an Xtreme CT-scanner (SCANCO Medical AG, Switzerland).

Bone biopsies:

Optional bone biopsies will be taken after assessment of pain characteristics. Participation in the overall study is allowed without participating in this examination.

One 7 mm biopsy marked with tetracyclin 14, 13, 4, and 3 days prior will be fixed in ethanol and analysed by HRpQCT, Nano-scale and histomorphometry.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Understand oral and written Danish
  • Able to consent

For XLH only:

  • genetically verified XLH by detection of a disease-causing mutation in PHEX or a positive family history of X-linked hypophosphatemia.
  • biochemically verified hereditary hypophosphatemia: serum PO4 below normal range and low TmPO4/GFR, and/or elevated serum FGF23 and a history of childhood rickets or spontaneous endodontic abscesses to exclude acquired hypophosphatemia, e.g., tumor-induced osteomalacia.

Exclusion criteria

  • P-25OHD < 25 mmol/L*
  • Severe co-morbidities, which in the opinion of the investigator may have major impact on study outcomes. This may include, but is not limited to o poorly controlled hyperthyroidism o Paget disease

o type 1 diabetes mellitus or poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus

o severe and chronic cardiac, liver, or renal disease

o Cushing syndrome

o Rheumatoid arthritis

o Active pancreatitis

o Malnutrition

o Recent prolonged immobility*

o Active malignancy (including myeloma)

  • Treatment with

o Burosumab

  • Beta-blockers
  • Oral steroids
  • For controls only:
  • disturbances in the calcium or phosphate homeostasis
  • participants with low 25OHD levels or recent immobility may be re-screened for participations 6 months after this has been corrected

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. PPT

    Time frame: Day 2

    Pressure pain threshold assessed by pressure algometry

  2. Quality of life in patients with bone-specific pain

    Time frame: Day 1

    Assessed by questionnaire (FACT-BP) on a scale from 0 to 4. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

  3. General pain: Brief Pain Inventory

    Time frame: Day 1

    Assessed by questionnaire (Brief Pain Inventory) on a scale from 0 to 10. 0 meaning no pain, 10 meaning worst pain ever.

  4. Neuropathic pain: questionnaire (painDETECT)

    Time frame: Day 1

    Assessed by questionnaire (painDETECT) on a scale from 0 to 10. 0 meaning no pain, 10 meaning worst pain ever.

  5. Health-related quality of life: SF36v2

    Time frame: Day 1

    Assessed by questionnaire (SF36v2) on a scale from 1 to 5. Higher scores meaning a worse outcome.

  6. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure

    Time frame: 24 hours

    24 hour blood pressure of the upper right arm

  7. Pulse wave velocity

    Time frame: 45 minutes

    Assessed by tonometry using SphygmoCor system

  8. Arterial stiffness

    Time frame: 45 minutes

    Assessed by tonometry using SphygmoCor system

  9. Arterial stiffness

    Time frame: 24 hours

    Assessed by tonometry using Arteriograph24

  10. Maximum strength

    Time frame: Day 2

    Handgrip strength, elbow and knee flexion and extension assessed by dynamometer chair (Good Strength; Metitur Ltd, Finland).

  11. Maximal force production

    Time frame: Day 2

    Handgrip strength, elbow and knee flexion and extension assessed by dynamometer chair (Good Strength; Metitur Ltd, Finland).

  12. Timed Up and Go

    Time frame: Day 2

    Measures the time to stand up, walk three metres in a straight line, and immediately return to the chair.

  13. Repeated chair rising

    Time frame: Day 2

    Measures the time for ten consecutive chair rises.

  14. Repeated weight lifting

    Time frame: Day 2

    Measures the time for ten consecutive weight lifts.

  15. 6-minutes' walk test

    Time frame: Day 1

    Measures the distance walked in 6 minutes.

  16. Body composition

    Time frame: Day 2

    Assessed by DXA

  17. Vertebral Fracture Assessment

    Time frame: Day 2

    Assessed by DXA

  18. Volumetric bone mineral density

    Time frame: Day 1

    Assessed by HRpQCT of distal tibia, distal radius, and bone biopsy

  19. Bone geometry

    Time frame: Day 1

    Assessed by HRpQCT of distal tibia, distal radius, and bone biopsy

  20. Bone microarchitecture

    Time frame: Day 1

    Assessed by HRpQCT of distal tibia, distal radius, and bone biopsy

  21. Estimated bone strength

    Time frame: Day 1

    Assessed by HRpQCT of distal tibia, distal radius, and bone biopsy

  22. Mineralization rate

    Time frame: 14 days

    Histomorphometry on bone biopsy

  23. Mineralization lag time

    Time frame: 14 days

    Histomorphometry on bone biopsy

  24. Osteoid volume

    Time frame: 14 days

    Osteoid volume in trabecular and compact bone assessed by histomorphometry on bone biopsy

  25. Osteoid thickness

    Time frame: 14 days

    Osteoid thickness in trabecular and compact bone assessed by histomorphometry on bone biopsy

  26. Osteoid surface covering

    Time frame: 14 days

    Osteoid surface covering in trabecular and compact bone assessed by histomorphometry on bone biopsy

  27. Percentage of surface covered by osteoblasts

    Time frame: 14 days

    Assessed by histomorphometry on bone biopsy

  28. Percentage of surface covered by osteoclasts

    Time frame: 14 days

    Assessed by histomorphometry on bone biopsy

  29. Lacunar concentration of mineralization inhibitors

    Time frame: 14 days

    Assessed by nano-scale on bone biopsy

Secondary outcomes

  1. Catastrophic thinking

    Time frame: Day 1

    Assessed by questionnaire (Pain Catastrophizing Scale) on a scale from 0 to 4. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

  2. Depression

    Time frame: Day 1

    Assessed by questionnaire (Patient Health Questionnaire) on a scale from 0 to 3. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

  3. Anxiety

    Time frame: Day 1

    Assessed by questionnaire (Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7) on a scale from 0 to 3. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

Other outcomes

  1. Smallest distance between knees.

    Time frame: Day 1

    Measured in standing, weight bearing position.

  2. Smallest distance between ankles.

    Time frame: Day 1

    Measured in standing, weight bearing position.

  3. Joint mobility

    Time frame: Day 1

    Passive mobility of the neck, shoulder, elbow, wrist, ankle, back, hip and knee will be measured from anatomic neutral position using a protractor and compared to normal values.

  4. Areal bone mineral density (aBMD)

    Time frame: Day 2

    BMD at the lumbar spine, femoral neck and distal forearm assessed by DXA

  5. Plasma concentration of ion-calcium

    Time frame: Day 1

    Plasma concentration of ion-calcium taken in a fasting state

  6. Plasma concentration of phosphate

    Time frame: Day 1

    Plasma concentration of phosphate taken in a fasting state

  7. Plasma concentration of magnesium

    Time frame: Day 1

    Plasma concentration of magnesium taken in a fasting state

  8. Plasma concentration of creatinine

    Time frame: Day 1

    Plasma concentration of creatinine taken in a fasting state

  9. Plasma concentration of PTH

    Time frame: Day 1

    Plasma concentration of PTH taken in a fasting state

  10. Concentration of vitamin D metabolites

    Time frame: Day 1

    Plasma levels of 25OHD, 1,25(OH)2D, 24,25(OH)2D, 1,24,25(OH)3D and vitamin D-binding protein taken in a fasting state

  11. Plasma concentration of FGF23

    Time frame: Day 1

    Plasma concentration of FGF23 taken in a fasting state

  12. Plasma concentration of sclerostin

    Time frame: Day 1

    Plasma concentration of sclerostin taken in a fasting state

  13. Plasma concentration of klotho

    Time frame: Day 1

    Plasma concentration of klotho taken in a fasting state

  14. Plasma concentration of osteopontin

    Time frame: Day 1

    Plasma concentration of osteopontin taken in a fasting state

  15. Plasma concentrations of bone turnover markers

    Time frame: Day 1

    Plasma levels of bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, osteocalcin, procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (P1NP), C-terminal telopeptide (CTX)

  16. Plasma concentration of tissue non-specific alkaline phosphatase

    Time frame: Day 1

    Plasma levels of tissue non-specific alkaline phosphatase taken in a fasting state

  17. Urine calcium

    Time frame: 24 hours

    24 hours urine calcium

  18. Urine phosphate

    Time frame: 24 hours

    24 hours urine phosphate

  19. Urine magnesium

    Time frame: 24 hours

    24 hours urine magnesium

  20. Urine creatinine

    Time frame: 24 hours

    24 hours urine creatinine

  21. Urine sodium

    Time frame: 24 hours

    24 hours urine sodium

  22. Urine potassium

    Time frame: 24 hours

    24 hours urine potassium

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Aarhus

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Characterising Pain, Quality of Life, Body Composition, Arterial Stiffness, Muscle Function, Bone Density and Geometry in Adult Persons With Hereditary Hypophosphatemia and Healthy Controls

Important dates

Study start
2020
Primary completion
2022
Study completion
2022
First posted
Feb 18, 2020
Registry last updated
Nov 29, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.