Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06408207

CGM Academy for Youth With Type 1 Diabetes

The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to compare the effects of a virtual education curriculum in blood glucose variation of youth with type 1 diabetes wearing continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) device. The main questions the study aims to answer are:

* Do participants undertaking the proposed curriculum present improved glucose variation than participants of standard education? * Explore relationships between participant's glycemic outcomes with diabetes distress, diabetes family responsibilities, and number of hours of diabetes education.

Participants in the intervention group will:

* receive an interactive workbook with problem-based learning scenarios and video links about CGM and glucose management strategies. * participate in four in-depth online group sessions with diabetes care and education specialists * complete questionnaires three times: at the time of study enrollment, week 4 and 6 months.

Participants in the comparison group will:

* receive standard education provided to all patients at CHLA * complete questionnaires three times: at the time of study enrollment, week 4 and 6 months.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Conditions

Age range

8 year–18 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Children's Hospital Los Angeles

Los Angeles, California, 90027, United States

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Natalia Garban

CONTACT

[email protected]

Rebecca Barber, PhD, RN

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

About this study

Youth with type 1 diabetes (T1D) are at increased risk for kidney failure, vision loss, heart disease, and premature mortality due to challenges with glycemic excursions. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems represent an important advance in diabetes technology with significant advantages over self-monitored blood glucose and the potential to optimize glycemic management. Despite these advances, youth with T1D, including patients at Children's Hospital Los Angeles (CHLA), fail to achieve recommended glycemic targets, highlighting the opportunity for testing innovative diabetes education programs aimed at increased technology uptake such as the CGM Academy intervention.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Current age of 8-18 years, age group eligible for CGM therapy with Dexcom G6 and G7
  • T1D duration ≥6 months, as insulin adjustments during honeymoon stage differs from establishedT1D
  • Able to speak, read, and write English or Spanish
  • Smartphone compatible with Dexcom G6 and G7application
  • Ability to participate in virtual visits

Exclusion criteria

  • Known history of medical adhesive allergies

Treatment and study plan

CGM Academy

Behavioral

Educational materials as well as online sessions with diabetes educators.

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean change in Hemoglobin A1c from baseline to 6 months

    Time frame: Baseline to 6 months

    Change in Hemoglobin A1c

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mean change in HbA1c (%) from baseline to 6 months.

    Time frame: Baseline to 6 months

    Change in Hemoglobin A1c

  2. Mean change in CGM metrics measured by CGM readings

    Time frame: Week 4 & 6 months

    % Glucose Time in Range (70-180 mg/dL), % Glucose Time Below Range (<70mg/dL), % Glucose Time Above Range (>180mg/dL).

  3. Change in perceived diabetes distress at baseline, week 4 & 6 months

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4 & 6 months

    The Problem Areas in Diabetes survey (PAID) is an 18-item survey to assess the perceived burden associated with diabetes. Youth and caregivers are given statements about diabetes-related issues and report on a 5-point Likert scale (0 = not a problem, 1 = minor problem, 2 = moderate problem, 3 = somewhat serious problem, 4 = serious problem) the degree to which the statements are a problem for them. Increasing scores denote increased burden perceived.

  4. Change in perceived diabetes family responsibility at baseline, week 4 & 6 months.

    Time frame: Baseline, week 4 & 6 months

    The Diabetes Family Responsibility Questionnaire (DFRQ) is a 14-item validated survey assessing parental and child involvement in various diabetes management tasks. Youth and caregivers report on a 3-point scale (1=child, 2=equal, 3=parent) who is responsible for a given diabetes task. Higher scores indicate more parental involvement in diabetes management.

  5. Average number of diabetes educator hours used per study participant at week 4 & 6 months.

    Time frame: Week 4 and 6 months

    Number of hours spent in diabetes education

  6. Perceived benefits of Continuous Glucose Monitor (CGM) use

    Time frame: week 4 & 6 months

    Adolescent Benefits and Burdens of CGM Survey - BenCGM & BurCGM. Participants answer each question on a scale of Strong Disagree, Disagree, Neutral, Agree, Strongly Agree.

  7. Perceived burden of Continuous Glucose Monitor (CGM) use

    Time frame: week 4 & 6 months

    Adolescent Benefits and Burdens of CGM Survey - BenCGM & BurCGM. Participants answer each question on a scale of Strong Disagree, Disagree, Neutral, Agree, Strongly Agree.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Natalia Garban

CONTACT

[email protected]

Rebecca Barber, PhD, RN

CONTACT

[email protected]

(323) 361-1359 ext. 11359

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Children's Hospital Los Angeles

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Randomized Control Trial Evaluating the Impact of CGM Academy Education Curriculum Versus Standard Care on Glycemic Outcomes for Youth With Type 1 Diabetes

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
May 10, 2024
Registry last updated
Feb 6, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.