NCT Number: NCT00372541
Ceftriaxone Versus Chloramphenicol for Treatment of Severe Pneumonia in Children
Acute lower respiratory tract infections are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in sub Saharan Africa. The World Health Organisation (WHO) still recommends intravenous chloramphenicol for the treatment of severe pneumonia in children aged less than five years. However, up to 20% of children fail treatment due to the emergence of resistance by bacteria. Several centers now use ceftriaxone, a third generation cephalosporin, which is reported to be efficacious in the treatment of severe pneumonia. However the high cost of ceftriaxone is too prohibitive to allow for its routine use in resource constrained countries. The purpose of this study is to compare chloramphenicol and ceftriaxone in the treatment of severe pneumonia in children under five.
We hypothesize that 92.7% of children who receive once daily intravenous ceftriaxone (75 mg/kg body weight)for 7 days, will recover from severe pneumonia compared to 80.2 % of those who receive intravenous chloramphenicol (25mg/kg body weight/dose every 6 hours for 7 days).
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeKey information
Conditions
Age range
6 month–59 month
Sex eligibility
All sexes
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary location
Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Mulago Hospital, Kampala, East Africa, Uganda
About this study
A recent report from the World health Organization showed pneumonia was the leading cause of death in children less than 5 years. WHO recommends intravenous Chloramphenicol 25mg/kg six hourly as the first line drug for the treatment of severe pneumonia in these children. Ceftriaxone 75mg/kg daily is the second line drug.
The efficacy of chloramphenicol for the treatment of severe pneumonia ranges from 80%-84%, while that of ceftriaxone ranges from 85% to 97%. However the high cost of ceftriaxone is too prohibitive to allow for its routine use in resource constrained countries. A study comparing penicillin G plus chloramphenicol and ceftriaxone in the treatment of severe pneumonia in Turkey found that both drugs were equally effective in normalization of the outcome parameters. A recent Cochrane review found no randomized controlled trials comparing both drugs in the treatment of severe forms of pneumonia.
The objective of this study it to compare the efficacy of Ceftriaxone versus Chloramphenicol in the treatment of severe pneumonia in the children under five years of age admitted to Mulago hospital.
This will be a double- blinded randomized controlled trial. Three hundred forty eight children with severe pneumonia will be randomized to receive either intravenous ceftriaxone 75mg/kg/day for seven days or intravenous chloramphenicol 100mg/kg/day for seven days. The primary outcome will mortality and secondary outcomes will be time taken to normalization of respiratory rate, temperature and oxygen saturation.
Who can participate
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
- Children aged 6 months to 59months with cough, difficult breathing and lower chest indrawing
- Consent from parent/carer
Exclusion criteria
- Children with severe Asthmatic attack
- Allergy to any of the study drugs
- Diagnosis of Pneumocystis JiroveciPneumonia on therapeutic treatment
Treatment and study plan
Primary outcomes
-
Mortality from severe pneumonia by 7th day of treatment
Secondary outcomes
-
Time to normalisation of respiratory rate
-
Time to normalisation temperature
-
Time to normalisation of oxygen saturation
Sponsors and collaborators
Lead sponsor
Makerere University
Other
Registry information
Official study title
Ceftriaxone Versus Chloramphenicol for Treatment of Severe Pneumonia in Children Aged Less Than Five Years at Mulago Hospital: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Important dates
- Study start
- 2006
- Primary completion
- 2007
- Study completion
- 2007
- First posted
- Sep 7, 2006
- Registry last updated
- Jul 26, 2010
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Related clinical trials
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
A Study of How Ibuzatrelvir is Taken up Into the Blood of Healthy Adults After Taking Different Tablets of Ibuzatrelvir
NCT07552779
COVID-19, COVID-19 (Coronavirus Disease 2019)
Brussels, Bruxelles-capitale, Région de, Belgium
View Trial DetailsFlexible Bronchoscopy in Resistant Pneumonia in PICU
NCT07421440
Infections, Lung Diseases
Cairo, Cairo Governorate, Egypt
View Trial DetailsIndividualizing Corticosteroid Use in Pneumonia
NCT05334316
Infections, Lung Diseases
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
View Trial DetailsEffect of Neurophysiological Facilitation of Respiration on Blood Gases and Hospital Stay in Children With Pneumonia
NCT07070271
Infections, Lung Diseases
Giza, Egypt
View Trial Details