Kasr Al-Ainy Medical School, Cairo University
Cairo, Egypt
NCT Number: NCT07199816
Comparing the analgesic effect of caudal epidural versus combined lumbar sympathetic block with caudal epidural in patients undergoing redo spinal surgery.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me40 year–70 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Cairo, Egypt
To evaluate the improvement in pain score using numerical rate scale (NRS) over 4 months and compare this between the two groups.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Under fluoroscopic guidance, the patient in the prone position will receive a caudal epidural injection through the sacral hiatus. A 22-gauge, 3.5-inch spinal needle (Spinocan®, BRAUN) is used to inject 1 mL of contrast media (Omnipaque 300) to confirm correct needle placement. Then, 10 mL of treatment solution (8 mL of 0.5% lidocaine and 2 mL of 8 mg dexamethasone) is administered.
Patients will receive both a caudal epidural block and a lumbar sympathetic ganglion block (LSGB) under fluoroscopic guidance. The LSGB is performed at the L2 or L3 vertebral body on the affected side using a 21-gauge Chiba needle. After confirming needle position with contrast imaging, 10 mL of solution (2 mL of 8 mg dexamethasone + 8 mL of 1% lidocaine) is injected. A caudal block is then performed as described above.
Time frame: Baseline and 3 months postoperative
Pain intensity will be assessed using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), where patients rate their pain from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). NRS scores will be compared between the two groups (caudal epidural block vs. combined lumbar sympathetic and caudal epidural block) to evaluate the long-term effectiveness of the interventions.
Time frame: Baseline, 1 week, 1month, and 2 months after surgery
Pain will be measured using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain imaginable. Pain scores will be recorded preoperative and at 6, 12, 18, and 24 hours postoperatively to assess short-term pain control.
Time frame: from the end of surgery up to 24 hours after surgery
Time (in hours) from the end of the procedure to the first request for analgesia. A longer time indicates more effective initial pain relief.
Time frame: During the first 24 hours after surgery
Total amount of morphine administered postoperatively will be recorded in milligrams to evaluate analgesic requirement across both groups.
Time frame: 3 months after the surgery
Pain relief will be categorized based on WHO four-grade scale: Complete Remission (CR), Partial Remission (PR), Mild Remission (MR), and No Response (NR), assessed at 3 months to evaluate long-term analgesic effect.
Time frame: Baseline, 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months after surgery
The EuroQol (EQ-5D) questionnaire will be used to assess functional status and early ambulation at multiple follow-up points. Higher scores reflect better recovery and quality of life.
Time frame: Through hospital discharge, an average of 3 days
Total number of days the patient remains hospitalized will be recorded to evaluate the effect of the intervention on recovery time.
Time frame: From block administration through hospital discharge, an average of 3 days
Any adverse events or complications related to caudal epidural or lumbar sympathetic ganglion blocks (e.g., infection, hematoma, neurologic symptoms) will be recorded and compared between groups.
Hebatullah Mohammed Abdelmageed
Other
The Analgesic Effect of Caudal Epidural Versus Combined Lumbar Sympathetic Block With Caudal Epidural in Patients Undergoing Redo Lumbar Surgery: A Randomized Double Blinded Controlled Trial.
Acronym: CLEARS
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07576062
After Lumbar Spine Surgery, Agnosia
View Trial DetailsNCT07502612
Back Pain, Failed Back Surgery Syndrome
Wilrijk, Belgium
View Trial DetailsNCT07736118
Agnosia, Behavior
Kayseri, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07145788
Agnosia, Chronic Pain
Stuttgart, Auerbachstraße 112, Germany
View Trial Details