Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH)
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States
NCT Number: NCT05157880
The purpose of the present investigation is to test the efficacy of a brief (6 sessions) dyadic (patient and caregiver together) intervention to prevent chronic emotional distress in at risk dyads admitted to a Neuroscience Intensive Care Unit with an acute brain injury. Through this study, we seek to solve the unmet need of preventing chronic emotional distress in Neuroscience Intensive Care Unit (NICU) dyads through a feasible, acceptable and credible program, and ideally improve the recovery trajectory and dyads' overall quality of life.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States
The goals of this study are to: 1) demonstrate the efficacy of Recovering Together for improving self-reported emotional distress (primary outcome), and post traumatic stress, mindfulness, coping, social support and other relevant outcomes (secondary outcomes); and 2) assess mechanisms (mediators and moderators) of improvement after intervention. We will enroll and randomly assign 194 at risk dyads (97 per study group) to receive either the active intervention or educational control. The trial is single blinded (assessors, patients and staff). The trial will take place at the Massachusetts General Hospital NICU using our established methodology successfully implemented during the R21 pilot study. Study clinicians will deliver 6, 30 minute sessions of active intervention or educational control (2 at bedside and 4 via live video after discharge) to each patient-caregiver dyad. All participants will complete measures at baseline, after completion of program (6 weeks) and 3 months later. They will also complete measures of emotional distress weekly, as well as measures assessing home practice.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
In the skills-based intervention group, sessions focus on developing skills to cope and manage ANI related stressors. The intervention will be tailored consistent with AHA recommendations for ANI skills-based interventions and will include 2 general and 4 specific modules. It is anticipated that the intervention will have 6 sessions with 2 general sessions delivered, in person if possible, within the NICU, or through live video using Zoom if patients leave the hospital before sessions occur, and 4 tailored specific sessions (chosen from by the dyads from 6 available modules) to be delivered via live video using Zoom.
Other names: Skills-based intervention
Time frame: 0 weeks, 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks, 4 weeks, 5 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months
Hospital Depression and Anxiety Scale total score (HADS); 0-21 for each subscale (anxiety and depression), higher scores indicate greater anxiety or depression
Time frame: 0 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist - Specific Event (PCL-S); 17-85, higher scores indicate greater post-traumatic stress
Time frame: 0 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months
Toronto Mindfulness Scale-Trait (TMS-Trait); 0-52, higher scores indicate greater perceived mindfulness (specifically curiosity and de-centering)
Time frame: 0 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months
Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale (CAMS); 12-48, higher scores indicate greater perceived mindfulness
Time frame: 0 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months
Measure of Current Status Part A (MOCS-A); 0-52; higher scores indicate greater perceived ability to cope
Time frame: 0 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months
Dyadic Coping Inventory (DCI); 35-175; higher scores indicate greater perceived coping in the context of a relationship
Time frame: 0 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months
Interpersonal Support Evaluation List-12 (ISEL-12); 0-48, higher scores indicate greater perceived social support
Time frame: 0 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months
Experiences in Close Relationships Scale short form (ECR-S); 7-42, higher scores indicate greater avoidant or anxious communication
Time frame: 0 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months
Dyadic Relationship Scale (DRS); Patient version: 10-40, caregiver version: 11-44, dyadic strain subscale: higher scores indicate greater levels of strain, positive dyadic interaction subscale: higher scores indicate greater levels of positive interaction
Time frame: 0 weeks
Age; biological sex; gender; race/ethnicity; educational level; employment status; occupation; income; marital status; prior ANI status; mental health history; psychotropic medications; medical comorbidities; satisfaction with medical staff (analog scale 0-10)
Time frame: 0 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months
Barthel Score; 0-100, higher scores indicate greater independence
Time frame: 0 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months
Modified Rankin; 0-6, higher scores indicate greater disability
Massachusetts General Hospital
Other
Recovering Together: Building Resiliency in Dyads of Patients With an Acute Brain Injury Admitted to the Neuroscience Intensive Care Unit and Their Informal Caregivers
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07219108
Acute Medical Conditions, Acute Neurological Injury
St Louis, Missouri, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07052656
Acute Brain Injuries, Acute Neurological Injury
Stockholm, Sweden
View Trial DetailsNCT04865679
Amputation, Chronic Nerve Pain
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05336864
Cardiovascular Diseases, Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, Type 1F
Basel, Switzerland
View Trial Details