Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07425951

Building Cognitive Behavioural Skills With StoryBooks to Reduce Emotional Difficulties in Kindergarten Years

This research aims to ask (1) Are child and parent measures of coping skills, anxiety and other outcomes reliable (2) How feasible and acceptable is the proposed CB preventative program and protocol (3) Can a preliminary indication of efficacy for CB preventative program be provided.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

4 year–6 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University

Singapore

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Shaun Goh, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+6562196250

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Currently be enrolled in K1 or K2 in preschool.
  • Singaporean Citizen or of Permanent Resident status
  • Parent of study's participant has to have read a book with participant at least once in the last 6 months.

Exclusion criteria

  • Not currently enrolled in a child support programme
  • Not currently receiving medication for mental health concerns
  • Not currently receiving support from a Speech Language Therapist or Psychologist.

Treatment and study plan

Cognitive Behavioural

Device

Cognitive behavioural therapy incorporated into storybook reading with an emphasis on psychoeducation, relaxation techniques, social skills, graded exposure and cognitive strategies, for preschool children

Language

Device

Storybook reading with an emphasis on specific word vocabulary and narrative structure serving as a control, for preschool children

Primary outcomes

  1. Coping Skills - Coping Questionnaire Parent Report

    Time frame: Close out (Weeks 9 to 10)

    This consists of questions with a likert type response ranging from a minimum of 1 to a maximum of 7, measuring parent's perception of their child's coping efficacy in anxiety-inducing situations, which they nominate. In this study, the Coping Questionnaire is modified to have 4 questions, each pre-defined to be in keeping with each the four audiobook's anxiety-inducing situations. A higher score indicates a better outcome.

  2. Coping Skills - Coping Skills Word Definitions

    Time frame: Close out (Weeks 9 to 10)

    This consists of 8 emotional target words that are repeated throughout the 4 audiobooks. Each word is linked to common elements of CBT which are found in each of the four audiobooks, these include relaxation in book 1, social skills in book 2, graded exposure in book 3, cognitive techniques in book 4 and psychoeducation across all 4 books. Each word is scored as 0,1 or 2 denoting incorrect, partially correct and correct. Higher scores denote a better outcome.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Coping skills - Personal Story Generation

    Time frame: Close-out (Weeks 9 to 10)

    Children are asked to verbally tell two personal stories, based on the first and the last books of the audiobooks in the cognitive behavioural arm. Higher scores denote better outcomes.

  2. Anxiety- Preschool Anxiety Scale

    Time frame: Close out (Weeks 9 to 10)

    This measures the presence and severity of children's overall anxiety and six subtypes of anxiety: generalised anxiety, obsessive-compulsive disorder, physical injury fears, social anxiety, and separation anxiety. This has 28 items, with each item's minimum value of 0 and a maximum of 4. A higher score denotes a worse outcome.

  3. Maladjustment - Paediatric Symptom Checklist-17

    Time frame: Close out (Weeks 9 to 10)

    This is a 17-question parental report screen on children's internalising, attention and externalising problems, with a never/sometimes/often type response, designed for use in children age 4-15 years old. A higher score denotes a worse outcome.

  4. Maladjustment - Children's Emotional Adjustment Scale

    Time frame: Close out (Weeks 9 to 10)

    This has 29 questions with a never/seldom/sometimes/often/always response (ranging from 0 to 4), measuring children's emotional function in the domains of temper control, social assertiveness, and anxiety control. A higher score denotes a better outcome.

  5. Social Emotional Learning - Social Skills Improvement System

    Time frame: Close out (Weeks 9 to 10)

    This has 51 questions and measures children's social emotional learning in the domains of self-awareness, self-management, social awareness, relationship skills and responsible decision-making, with a never/seldom/sometimes/often/always response. Individual item scores range from 0 to 4 with a higher score denoting a better outcome.

Other outcomes

  1. Feasibility and Acceptability Objective : AIM, IAM and FIM

    Time frame: Close out (Weeks 9 to 10)

    Parents will also be asked to evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of the CB preventative programme, through a 12-item questionnaire. The questionnaire will consist of items in the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM), Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM), and Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) subscales. Each item's response is completely disagree/disagree/neither agree nor disagree/agree/completely agree. Each item is scored as a minimum of 1 and maximum of 5, with higher scores denoting better outcomes.

  2. Feasibility and Acceptability Objective : Fidelity Questionnaire

    Time frame: Post Randomisation (Weeks 3 to 8)

    Four questions after each session are asked on the scale of none/less than half/more than half/all. These pertain to the extent to which the pages were turned, audio was played, questions were asked and activities completed. Each question is scored from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 3, with higher scores denoting better outcomes.

  3. Feasibility and Acceptability Objective : Usable data

    Time frame: Baseline (Weeks 1 to 2 ) and Closeout (Weeks 9 to 10 )

    The amount of usable data at baseline and post test will be monitored

  4. Feasibility and Acceptability Objective : Attrition

    Time frame: Basline (Weeks 1 to 2) and Post-randomisation (Weeks 3 to 8) and Closeout (Weeks 9 to 10)

    The number of participants who withdraw from the study will be monitored

  5. Feasibility and Acceptability Objective : Enrollment of Participants

    Time frame: Enrollment

    The number of participants across the span of the enrollment period of the study will be measured.

  6. Language Arm Outcome : Proximal Word Definitions

    Time frame: Close-out (Weeks 9 to 10)

    Consists of 8 items, where children are asked to verbally define words that are elaborated in the language arm. Each word is scored as 0,1 or 2 denoting incorrect, partially correct and correct. Higher scores denote a better outcome.

  7. Language Arm Outcome : Proximal Narrative Structures

    Time frame: Close-out (Weeks 9 to 10)

    Children are asked to verbally tell two personal stories, based on the first and the last books of the audiobooks in the language arm. Higher scores denote better outcomes.

  8. Language Arm Outcome : Narrative Structures

    Time frame: Close-out (Weeks 9 to 10)

    To re-tell a story with pictures, and answer comprehension questions, from the Multilingual Assessment Instrument for Narratives (MAIN). Higher scores denote better outcomes.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Shaun Goh, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

62196250

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Nanyang Technological University

Other

Registry information

Acronym: B-READY

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Feb 23, 2026
Registry last updated
Apr 15, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.