Boston Children's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115, United States
NCT Number: NCT02664545
The goal of this trial is to compare the efficacy of the Bridge-Enhanced Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair (BEAR™) technique with the current method of treatment for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries, ACL reconstruction.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me14 year–35 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115, United States
Enrolled patients will be randomized to either the Bridge-Enhanced ACL Repair (BEAR) technique (new treatment) or an ACL reconstruction (current gold standard of treatment).
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
A sponge, or scaffold, which is surgically placed between the torn ligament ends and sutures are used to repair the torn anterior cruciate ligament.
A graft of tendon (either two hamstring tendons from the back of the knee or bone-patellar tendon-bone graft from the front of the knee)
Time frame: 2 years after surgery
This is a survey taken by patients to report how their knee is working for them. The IKDC is graded by adding the results and converting the result to a number on a scale from 0 to 100. Scores range from 0 (lowest level of function and highest level of symptoms) to 100 points (highest level of function and lowest level of symptoms).
Time frame: 2 years after surgery
This is a test of how stable the knee is.
The anteroposterior (AP) knee laxity will be determined using a KT arthrometer at the 30lb (130N) setting on both knees of the subject at six months and 1, 2, 6 and 10 years after surgery (see Appendix C). Both sides will be covered with a sleeve so the licensed examiner cannot tell which is the operated knee or which procedure the patient had.
Values for both knees will be recorded. For knee laxity, a difference of 2.0 mm in the side-to-side difference measurements at 2 years after surgery, the primary analysis, for the patients in the bridge-enhanced repair group vs. the ACL reconstruction group will be considered clinically significant.
Time frame: 6 months
Measured by a hand-held dynamometer on both the involved and contralateral knees, measured as injured knee as percent of non injured knee. The subject lies on their stomach and flexes their leg. The trainer puts the dynamometer near the ankle in the direction of extension. The subject pushes as hard as they can in the flexion direction, against the dynamometer. Ratio is calculated as the measurement of injured knee over measurement of non-injured knee.
Time frame: 6 months
This is a survey taken by patients to report how confident they are in returning to sports after the injury. The 12 questions on the ACL-RSI scale ask about the psychological effects of returning to sports. The ACL-RSI items are graded using an NRS (numeric rating scale) from 0 to 10. It has three domains: risk appraisal, confidence, and emotions. A total score between 0 and 100 is calculated by adding and averaging the scores for each item. Greater psychological preparation is indicated by higher scores.
Miach Orthopaedics
Industry
A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Clinical Trial Evaluating the Non-Inferiority of Bridge-Enhanced Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair (BEAR) to Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With an Autologous Tendon Graft (ACLR)
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04039971
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture
Aurora, Colorado, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02292004
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06524349
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture
Fargo, North Dakota, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03776162
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear
Boulder, Colorado, United States
View Trial Details