The surgical department of Medical Research Institute Hospital, Alexandria University
Alexandria, Alexandria Governorate, 21531, Egypt
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT07230769
Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has become an increasingly popular bariatric procedure since its first performance by Hess and Hess in 1988 as a component of the biliopancreatic diversion-duodenal switch (BPD-DS) procedure, which was modified from Scopinaro's biliopancreatic diversion (BPD) and DeMeester's technique. In the early part of the twenty-first century, it was popularized as a first-step intervention before BPD or gastric bypass in the super obese and high-risk group of patients by Regan et al. Due to the unexpected good results in terms of weight loss and resolution of comorbidities, coupled with the simplicity of performing the procedure requiring intervention on only the stomach, sleeve gastrectomy gained status as a stand-alone bariatric procedure as demonstrated by Baltasar et al.
The basic principle of LSG is to create a narrow stomach along the lesser curvature, depending on the left gastric artery, using a calibration bougie as a template to perform a vertical partial gastrectomy, resecting the greater curvature and fundus of the stomach according to the International Sleeve Gastrectomy Expert Panel Consensus Statement by Rosenthal et al. The procedure has demonstrated excellent outcomes in terms of weight loss and comorbidity resolution, making it one of the most commonly performed bariatric procedures worldwide according to the IFSO Worldwide Survey by Angrisani et al.
Bougie Size Considerations and Rationale The selection of an appropriate bougie size during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy represents a critical technical decision that significantly influences both immediate surgical outcomes and long-term patient results. Calibration bougies serve as internal templates to standardize the gastric sleeve diameter and ensure consistent sleeve geometry across different surgeons and institutions, as described by Parikh et al.
The diameter of the bougie directly determines the final gastric volume and the degree of restriction achieved, which in turn affects weight loss efficacy, food tolerance, and complication rates.
Bougie sizes in current clinical practice typically range from 32-French (Fr) to 50-Fr, with most centers utilizing sizes between 34-Fr and 42-Fr according to the survey by Gagner et al. Small bougie sizes (32-36-Fr) create a more restrictive sleeve with potentially enhanced weight loss but may be associated with increased risks of stenosis, food intolerance, and gastroesophageal reflux disease as reported by Sakran et al.
Medium bougie sizes (38-42-Fr) represent a compromise between restriction and safety, offering adequate weight loss while maintaining acceptable complication rates as demonstrated by Weiner et al. Large bougie sizes (44-50-Fr) provide greater sleeve capacity with improved food tolerance and potentially reduced leak rates, though concerns exist regarding long-term weight loss maintenance according to Abdallah et al.
The rationale for comparing different bougie sizes stems from the ongoing debate regarding the optimal balance between surgical efficacy and safety. Recent meta-analyses have suggested that larger bougie sizes may be associated with reduced gastric leak rates without significantly compromising weight loss outcomes. However, the majority of existing evidence comes from retrospective observational studies with inherent limitations including selection bias, confounding variables, and lack of standardized outcome measures as noted by Shi et al. The current study aims to provide definitive prospective evidence comparing small (36-Fr) versus X large (larger than 40-Fr) bougie sizes in a randomized controlled trial design.
Furthermore, the impact of bougie size on comorbidity resolution remains inadequately studied. Bariatric surgery has demonstrated remarkable efficacy in resolving obesity-related comorbidities, with diabetes remission rates ranging from 53% to 63% as reported by Schauer et al. and hypertension resolution rates varying from 8% to 50% depending on the specific criteria used according to Sjöström et al. The relationship between sleeve geometry, as determined by bougie size, and comorbidity resolution mechanisms requires further investigation to optimize patient outcomes and surgical technique selection.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year–70 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Alexandria, Alexandria Governorate, 21531, Egypt
Location status: Recruiting
Hypothesis
The investigators hypothesize that the use of a larger calibration bougie (> 40-Fr) during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy will significantly reduce the incidence of postoperative gastric leak compared to standard smaller bougie sizes (36-Fr), without compromising weight loss outcomes or quality of life measures.
Hypotheses Tools
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Time frame: within 3 months postoperatively
The diagnosis of gastric leak must be fulfilled with any of the following criteria within 3 months postoperatively according to Benedix et al.:
Leak Classification System:
Time frame: will be administered at baseline, 1 month, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively
This validated instrument specifically designed for bariatric surgery patients evaluates six domains of quality of life:
Each domain is scored from -3 to +3 points, with total MA-II Score Range: -18 to +18 points.
Score interpretation:
Time frame: will be administered at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively.
The questionnaire evaluates:
Each food scored 0-3 points:
Total Suter Score Range: 0-27 points
Time frame: Baseline (preoperative) then 1, 3, 6, 12 months postoperative.
Calculation Formula: %TWL = [(Initial weight - Current weight) / Initial weight] × 100 (weight is measured in kilograms Kg)
Success Criteria according to Eisenberg et al.:
Time frame: Time Points: - 2 hours postoperatively - 6 hours postoperatively - 24 hours postoperatively - 48 hours postoperatively - Day 3 postoperatively
Assessment Tool: Modified Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV) Scale according to Apfel et al.
Nausea Assessment (0-10 scale):
Vomiting Assessment:
Antiemetic Usage:
Time frame: Assessment Schedule: - Immediate postoperative: Every 2 hours for first 24 hours - Postoperative day 1-2: Every 6 hours - Day 3 postoperatively: Final assessment - Follow-up visits: 1 week, 1 month
VAS Pain Scale: 100mm horizontal line with anchors according to Hawker et al.
Pain Categories:
Additional Pain Assessments:
Time frame: Baseline till Day 3 postoperatively.
Measurement Parameters:
Discharge Criteria:
Time frame: within 30 days
All complications within 30 days will be classified using the Clavien-Dindo system Grade I: Any deviation from normal postoperative course without need for pharmacological, surgical, endoscopic, or radiological interventions
Grade II: Requiring pharmacological treatment with drugs other than allowed for Grade I complications
Grade III: Requiring surgical, endoscopic, or radiological intervention
Grade IV: Life-threatening complications requiring intensive care management
Grade V: Death of patient
Suffix "d": Added if patient suffers from complication at discharge (e.g., Grade IIId)
Time frame: Assessment Time Points: 6 months and 12 months postoperatively
The evaluation of comorbidity resolution and improvement will be conducted according to the standardized outcomes reporting criteria established by the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS) Clinical Issues Committee, as published by Brethauer et al. This standardized approach ensures consistency with current best practices and facilitates comparison with other bariatric surgery studies.
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus:
Time frame: Assessment Time Points: 6 months and 12 months postoperatively
The evaluation of comorbidity resolution and improvement will be conducted according to the standardized outcomes reporting criteria established by the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS) Clinical Issues Committee, as published by Brethauer et al. This standardized approach ensures consistency with current best practices and facilitates comparison with other bariatric surgery studies.
Arterial Hypertension:
Time frame: Assessment Time Points: 6 months and 12 months postoperatively
The evaluation of comorbidity resolution and improvement will be conducted according to the standardized outcomes reporting criteria established by the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS) Clinical Issues Committee, as published by Brethauer et al. This standardized approach ensures consistency with current best practices and facilitates comparison with other bariatric surgery studies.
Dyslipidemia:
Time frame: Assessment Time Points: 6 months and 12 months postoperatively
The evaluation of comorbidity resolution and improvement will be conducted according to the standardized outcomes reporting criteria established by the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS) Clinical Issues Committee, as published by Brethauer et al. This standardized approach ensures consistency with current best practices and facilitates comparison with other bariatric surgery studies.
Obstructive Sleep Apnea:
Time frame: Mandatory 1-Year Upper GI Assessment GERD-Q Questionnaire Administration Timeline: - Preoperative: (baseline) - 1 month postoperative - 3 months postoperative - 6 months postoperative - 12 months postoperative
Mandatory 1-Year Upper GI Assessment:
Time frame: within 1,6,12 months preoperatively.
Baseline Assessment
Normal ranges for a Complete Blood Count (CBC) vary by age, sex, and even the laboratory performing the test, but generally, adult normal ranges include:
Time frame: within 1,6,12 months preoperatively.
Baseline Assessment:
(measured in Grams or milligrams per deciliter)
Time frame: within 1,6,12 months preoperatively.
Baseline Assessment:
Time frame: within 1,6,12 months preoperatively.
Baseline Assessment:
Time frame: within 1,6,12 months preoperatively.
Baseline Assessment:
Time frame: within 1,6,12 months preoperatively.
Baseline Assessment: - Thyroid function tests (Serum TSH) Normal thyroid function test values vary by lab, age, and pregnancy status, but a typical range for adults is 0.4-4.0 mIU/L for TSH. (measured in milli international unit per liter)
Time frame: within 1,6,12 months preoperatively.
Baseline Assessment:
Time frame: within 1,6,12 months preoperatively.
Baseline Assessment:
Time frame: within 1,6,12 months preoperatively.
Baseline Assessment:
Time frame: within 1,6,12 months preoperatively.
Baseline Assessment:
General Range: 250-450 mcg/dL (45-81 micromol/L) Transferrin Saturation: The percentage of transferrin (a protein that carries iron) that is saturated with iron.
Males: 20-50% Females: 15-45% Ferritin: Measures the body's iron stores. Men: 30-300 ng/mL Women: 20-200 ng/mL
Time frame: within 1,6,12 months preoperatively.
Baseline Assessment:
Time frame: within 1,6,12 months preoperatively.
Baseline Assessment:
Time frame: within 1,6,12 months preoperatively.
Baseline Assessment:
Time frame: within 1,6,12 months preoperatively.
Baseline Assessment:
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
General Committee of Teaching Hospitals and Institutes, Egypt
Other Gov
Impact of Bougie Diameter on Outcomes in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy - A Randomized Controlled Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07063979
Bariatric Sleeve Gastrectomy, Nausea
Plainsboro, New Jersey, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07637357
Bariatric Sleeve Gastrectomy, Cognition Disorders
Istanbul, Sancaktepe, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07293624
Bariatric Sleeve Gastrectomy, Bariatric Surgery
Istanbul, Uskudar, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07319390
Bariatric Sleeve Gastrectomy
Cairo, Egypt
View Trial Details