Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Damascus University
Damascus, Syria
NCT Number: NCT04578717
Evaluating the clinical behavior of composite restorations in NCCLs when the surface is pre-conditioned using bioactive glass air-abrasion has not been reported in the dental literature. This double-blinded randomised clinical trial evaluated the effect of surface pre-conditioning with bioactive air-abrasion on the performance of composite restorations in NCCLs placed using etch&rinse and self-etch adhesive systems.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me19 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Damascus, Syria
15 Patients with 100 teeth meeting the inclusion criteria were enrolled in this study. NCCLs characteristics were evaluated and recorded before the placement of restorations. The cavity dimensions in millimeters (height, width, and depth), the cavity geometry (labeled at >45°, 45° - 90°, 90° - 135°, and <135°), the degree of dentin sclerosis , the existence of attrition facets, and the existence of spontaneous sensitivity were measured and recorded in the patient's form. The preoperative sensitivity was also evaluated by applying air from a dental syringe placed 2 cm from the tooth surface for 10 seconds.
NCCLs meeting the inclusion criteria were randomly assigned into four experimental groups (n=25); A: air-abrasion + etch&rinse, B: air-abrasion + self-etch, C: etch&rinse and D: self-etch.
Prophylaxis was conducted using a rubber cup with pumice and water. The color of the composite was selected using VITA classical shade guide before applying local anesthesia with Lidocaine 2% with 1:100000 adrenaline. Retraction chord was inserted into the gingival sulcus with the aid of a blunt spatula without excessive pressure to the periodontium. Teeth were isolated with rubberdam. No preparation or beveling of cavosurface margins was performed to the NCCLs.
In air-abrasion groups, a clinical air-abrasion unit was used to pre-condition the NCCLs with bioactive glass 45S5 powder for 10 sec. The operating parameters were; air pressure, 20 psi; powder particles size, 20 µm; nozzle angle, 90◦; nozzle-lesion distance, 5 mm and the internal nozzle diameter, 900 µm
For the etch&rinse groups, enamel and dentine were etched using 37% Phosphoric acid for 30 sec and 15 sec respectively. NCCLs were rinsed thoroughly for 20 sec to remove the acid. Excess water was removed using a cotton pellet to leave a moist dentine surface. One coat of bonding adhesive was gently scrubbed on the entire enamel and dentin surface for 20 sec, air dried for 5 sec and light cured for 10 sec using LED curing light ( output >800mW/cm2).
In self-etch groups, the bonding adhesive was applied to enamel and dentine for 20 sec with agitation, gently air dried and light cured for 10 sec.
NCCLs were restored using FiltekTM Z250 XT resin composite, placed in 2 mm increments and light cured for 20 s per increment. Final contour was achieved with a fine diamond rotary instrument followed by finishing and polishing using Optrapol polishing kit .
Clinical evaluation was conducted by two trained and calibrated examiners. The examiners and patients were blinded to the group assignment, in accordance with the double-blinding randomized clinical trial design. Each restoration was evaluated at baseline (one week after restoration placement), 3 months and 6 months. This evaluation was conducted according to World Federation criteria (FDI)
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
A clinical air-abrasion unit was used to pre-condition the NCCLs with bioactive glass 45S5 powder for 10 sec. The operating parameters were; air pressure, 20 psi; powder particles size, 20 µm; nozzle angle, 90◦; nozzle-lesion distance, 5 mm and the internal nozzle diameter, 900 µm
Other names: surface pre-conditioning
Enamel and dentine were etched using 37% Phosphoric acid for 30 sec and 15 sec respectively. NCCLs were rinsed thoroughly for 20 sec to remove the acid. Excess water was removed using a cotton pellet to leave a moist dentine surface. One coat of bonding adhesive was gently scrubbed on the entire enamel and dentin surface for 20 sec, air dried for 5 sec and light cured for 10 sec using LED curing light. The light intensity of curing unit was calibrated daily using curing radiometer .
Other names: Bonding
The bonding adhesive was applied to enamel and dentine for 20 sec with agitation, gently air dried and light cured for 10 sec.
Other names: Bonding
Time frame: Baseline (one week after restoration placement), Change from Baseline rate of retention at 3 months, Change from Baseline rate of retention at 6 months
The unabbreviated scale title: Restoration Retention Rate and Integrity Scale
The minimum and maximum values: 1, 5
Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Time frame: Baseline (one week after restoration placement), Change from Baseline marginal adaptation at 3 months, Change from Baseline marginal adaptation at 6 months
Time frame: Baseline (one week after restoration placement), Change from Baseline postoperative hypersensitivity at 3 months, Change from Baseline postoperative hypersensitivity at 6 months
This will be assessed using Dentine Hypersensitivity Scale difference from the baseline values. Tooth sensitivity score was assessed by applying air from a dental syringe placed 2-cm from the tooth surface for 10 seconds.
The unabbreviated scale title: Dentine Postoperative Hypersensitivity Scale
The minimum and maximum values: 1, 5
Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
3.1. Premature / slightly more intense
3.2. Delayed/weak sensitivity; no subjective complaints, no treatment needed.
4.1. Premature/ very intense
4.2. Extremely delayed/weak with subjective complaints
4.3. Negative Sensitivity Intervention necessary but not replacement.
Time frame: Baseline (one week after restoration placement), Change from Baseline recurrence of caries at 3 months, Change from Baseline recurrence of caries at 6 months
Time frame: Baseline (one week after restoration placement), Change from Baseline staining margin at 3 months, Change from Baseline staining margin at 6 months
The unabbreviated scale title: Marginal Staining Scale
The minimum and maximum values: 1, 5
Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Damascus University
Other
Effect of Surface Pre-conditioning With Bioactive Glass Air-abrasion on the Clinical Performance of Composite Restorations in Non-carious Cervical Lesions
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05870787
Cervical Cancer, Cervical Disease
Fredericia, Denmark
View Trial DetailsNCT05593159
Cervical Lesion
Damascus, Syria
View Trial DetailsNCT04735718
Cervical Lesion
Bucharest, Romania
View Trial DetailsNCT05668806
Cervical Lesion, Female Urogenital Diseases
Bucharest, Romania
View Trial Details