Rigshospitalet
Copenhagen, 2100, Denmark
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT05399745
Biliary atresia is the most severe form of cholestatic liver disease. The children have high morbidity and mortality and get devastating pruritus and fatigue, failure to thrive, progressive hepatic failure and impaired neurodevelopment. The etiology is mostly unknown. More than half need a new liver from a living or deceased donor during childhood. However, correct timing of the transplantation is extremely difficult because of lack of consensus based on clinical assessment tools. All though the incidence is low, the cost of this disease is tremendous from both a clinical and human perspective. So far, protocolized neurodevelopment tests, genetic profiling, precise malnutrition evaluation based on clinical appearance, biochemical markers and brain MRI-scans, body composition, immunological function, level of physical activity and optimal time of transplantation in cholestatic children are unknown.
The aim is to determine risk factors for neurocognitive impairment in children suffering from severe cholestasis in order to determine optimal time for liver transplantation from a brain perspective.
In a prospective study, the investigators will investigate risk factors related to brain-, heart-, gut- and immunological function in the Danish cohort. This cohort consists of 75 children aged 0-18 years. In addition, 30 aged and gender matched healthy and 20 tetra fallot children will serve as control groups. The children will undergo extensive and advanced liver function evaluation, genetic profiling, nutrition and immunological status, neuro-imaging and neurocognitive evaluation at time of diagnose, 2 years of age, pre-school, pre-teenage, and teenage. In case of a liver transplantation, additional neuro-cognitive tests will be performed
Interested in participating?
Request Info0 year–18 year
All sexes
Observational
Copenhagen, 2100, Denmark
Location status: Recruiting
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Neurocognitive tests and MRI of the brain
Time frame: Inclusion
% of patients with anatomic anomalies on MRI of the brain
Time frame: Inclusion
Neurocognitive test panel depending on age at inclusion
% of patients with of abnormal movement assessed using early movement repertoire (GM) if inclusion at diagnosis. Early movement repertoire is a measurement tool where abnormal movement is identified.
Time frame: Inclusion
Neurocognitive test panel depending on age at inclusion:
Alberta Infant Motor Scale if inclusion at diagnosis
Percentile, highest is the best
Time frame: Inclusion
Neurocognitive test panel depending on age at inclusion:
Bayley Scales of Development III if inclusion up to 2.5 years:
From 0-200, highest is best
Time frame: Inclusion
Neurocognitive test panel depending on age at inclusion:
WIPPSI if inclusion between 2.5-6 years:
Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence, from 41 to 160, highest is best
Time frame: Inclusion
Neurocognitive test panel depending on age at inclusion:
ABC Movement if inclusion between 2.5-16 years
Movement Assessment Battery for Children, mean 10 SD 3, highest is best
Time frame: Inclusion
Neurocognitive test panel depending on age at inclusion:
WISC-IV if inclusion between 6-16 years
Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, 40 to 160, highest is best
Time frame: Inclusion
Neurocognitive test panel depending on age at inclusion:
Auditory Verbal Learning Test/ToMaL if inclusion between 6-18 years Mean 10 SD 3, highest is best
Time frame: Inclusion
Neurocognitive test panel depending on age at inclusion:
TEA-Ch if inclusion between 6-18 years
Test of Everyday Attention for Children, normalized to z-score, highest is best
Time frame: Inclusion
Neurocognitive test panel depending on age at inclusion:
BADS-C if inclusion between 6-18 years Behavioural Assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome in Children, 0-24, mean 10 SD 3, highest is best
Time frame: Inclusion
Neurocognitive test panel depending on age at inclusion:
Test of Visual Perceptual Skills if inclusion between 6-18 years
Percentile, highest is best
Time frame: Inclusion
Neurocognitive test panel depending on age at inclusion:
CANTAB if inclusion between 6-18 years Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery
Time frame: Inclusion
Neurocognitive test panel depending on age at inclusion:
The Beery Visuo-Motor Integration test if inclusion between 6-18 years Mean of 100 and standard deviation of 15, highest is best
Time frame: Inclusion
Neurocognitive test panel depending on age at inclusion:
WAIS IV if inclusion from 16 to 18 years Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, 40-160, highest is best
Time frame: Inclusion
Neurocognitive test panel depending on age at inclusion:
Kiddie-sads if included between 2-18 years Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia, 0-61, lowest is best
Time frame: Inclusion
Neurocognitive test panel depending on age at inclusion:
BRIEF 1 if inclusion up to 6 years Behaviour Rating Inventory of Executive Function, percentile, lowest is best
Time frame: Inclusion
Neurocognitive test panel depending on age at inclusion:
BRIEF 2 if inclusion between 6-18 years Behaviour Rating Inventory of Executive Function, percentile, lowest is best
Time frame: Inclusion
Neurocognitive test panel depending on age at inclusion:
CBCL if included between 2-18 years Child Behavior Checklist, percentile, lowest is best
Time frame: Inclusion
Neurocognitive test panel depending on age at inclusion:
ADHD screening if included between 2-18 years Lowest is best, 0-78
Time frame: Inclusion
Neurocognitive test panel depending on age at inclusion:
SRS-2 screening if included between 6-18 years
Social Responsiveness Scale, 32-114. lowest is best
Time frame: Inclusion
Neurocognitive test panel depending on age at inclusion:
Vineland screening if included between 6-18 years Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, 20 to 160, highest is best
Time frame: 1 year
% of patients with anatomic anomalies on MRI of the brain
Time frame: 1 year
Alberta Infant Motor Scale Percentile, highest is the best
Time frame: 1 year
Bayley Scales of Development III
From 0-200, highest is best
Time frame: 1 year
BRIEF 1 Behaviour Rating Inventory of Executive Function, percentile, lowest is best
Time frame: 1 year
CBCL Child Behavior Checklist, percentile, lowest is best
Time frame: 1 year
Kiddie-Sads Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia, 0-61, lowest is best
Time frame: 2 years
% of patients with anatomic anomalies on MRI of the brain
Time frame: 2 years
Bayley Scales of Development III From 0-200, highest is best
Time frame: 2 years
BRIEF 1 Behaviour Rating Inventory of Executive Function, percentile, lowest is best
Time frame: 2 years
CBCL Child Behavior Checklist, percentile, lowest is best
Time frame: 2 years
Kiddie-Sads Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia, 0-61, lowest is best
Time frame: 2 years
ADHD Lowest is best, 0-78
Time frame: 2 years
Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, 20 to 160, highest is best
Time frame: 6 years
% of patients with anatomic anomalies on MRI of the brain
Time frame: 6 years
Neurocognitive test panel depending on age Movement Assessment Battery for Children, mean 10 SD 3, highest is best
Time frame: 6 years
WISC-IV
Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, 40 to 160, highest is best
Time frame: 6 years
Auditory Verbal Learning Test/ToMaL Mean 10 SD 3, highest is best
Time frame: 6 years
TEA-Ch Test of Everyday Attention for Children, normalized to z-score, highest is best
Time frame: 6 years
BADS-C Behavioural Assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome in Children, 0-24, mean 10 SD 3, highest is best
Time frame: 6 years
Test of Visual Perceptual Skills Percentile, highest is best
Time frame: 6 years
The Beery Visuo-Motor Integration test Mean of 100 and standard deviation of 15, highest is best
Time frame: 6 years
CANTAB Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery
Time frame: 6 years
BRIEF 2 Behaviour Rating Inventory of Executive Function, percentile, lowest is best
Time frame: 6 years
ADHD screening Lowest is best, 0-78
Time frame: 6 years
SRS-2 Social Responsiveness Scale, 32-114. lowest is best
Time frame: 6 years
Kiddie-Sads Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia, 0-61, lowest is best
Time frame: 6 years
CBCL Child Behavior Checklist, percentile, lowest is best
Time frame: 6 years
Vineland Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, 20 to 160, highest is best
Time frame: 11 years
% of patients with anatomic anomalies on MRI of the brain
Time frame: 11 years
Neurocognitive test panel depending on age at inclusion:
ABC Movement if inclusion between 2.5-16 years
Movement Assessment Battery for Children, mean 10 SD 3, highest is best
Time frame: 11 years
WISC-IV
Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, 40 to 160, highest is best
Time frame: 11 years
Auditory Verbal Learning Test/ToMaL Mean 10 SD 3, highest is best
Time frame: 11 years
TEA-Ch Test of Everyday Attention for Children, normalized to z-score, highest is best
Time frame: 11 years
BADS-C Behavioural Assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome in Children, 0-24, mean 10 SD 3, highest is best
Time frame: 11 years
Test of Visual Perceptual Skills Percentile, highest is best
Time frame: 11 years
The Beery Visuo-Motor Integration test Mean of 100 and standard deviation of 15, highest is best
Time frame: 11 years
CANTAB Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery
Time frame: 11 years
BRIEF 2 Behaviour Rating Inventory of Executive Function, percentile, lowest is best
Time frame: 11 years
ADHD screening Lowest is best, 0-78
Time frame: 11 years
SRS-2 Social Responsiveness Scale, 32-114. lowest is best
Time frame: 11 years
Kiddie-Sads Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia, 0-61, lowest is best
Time frame: 11 years
CBCL Child Behavior Checklist, percentile, lowest is best
Time frame: 11 years
Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, 20 to 160, highest is best
Time frame: 16 years
% of patients with anatomic anomalies on MRI of the brain
Time frame: 16 years
Neurocognitive test panel depending on age at inclusion:
ABC Movement if inclusion between 2.5-16 years
Movement Assessment Battery for Children, mean 10 SD 3, highest is best
Time frame: 16 years
WISC-IV Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, 40-160, highest is best
Time frame: 16 years
Auditory Verbal Learning Test/ToMaL Mean 10 SD 3, highest is best
Time frame: 16 years
TEA-Ch Test of Everyday Attention for Children, normalized to z-score, highest is best
Time frame: 16 years
BADS-C Behavioural Assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome in Children, 0-24, mean 10 SD 3, highest is best
Time frame: 16 years
Test of Visual Perceptual Skills Percentile, highest is best
Time frame: 16 years
The Beery Visuo-Motor Integration test Mean of 100 and standard deviation of 15, highest is best
Time frame: 16 years
CANTAB Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery
Time frame: 16 years
BRIEF 2 Behaviour Rating Inventory of Executive Function, percentile, lowest is best
Time frame: 16 years
ADHD screening Lowest is best, 0-78
Time frame: 16 years
SRS-2 Social Responsiveness Scale, 32-114. lowest is best
Time frame: 16 years
Kiddie-Sads Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia, 0-61, lowest is best
Time frame: 16 years
CBCL Child Behavior Checklist, percentile, lowest is best
Time frame: 16 years
Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, 20 to 160, highest is best
Time frame: Inclusion
Whole genome sequencing of blood
Time frame: Inclusion
Whole genome sequencing of liver biopsy
Time frame: Inclusion
Microbiome measurements on urine
Time frame: Inclusion
Microbiome measurements on feces
Time frame: Inclusion
Microbiome measurements on saliva
Time frame: Inclusion
Microbiome measurement on feces
Time frame: Inclusion
Microbiome measurement on urine
Time frame: Inclusion
Microbiome measurement on saliva
Time frame: Inclusion
Microbiome measurements on feces
Time frame: Inclusion
Microbiome measurements on urine
Time frame: Inclusion
Microbiome measurements on saliva
Time frame: Inclusion
Microbiome measurements on feces
Time frame: Inclusion
Microbiome measurements on urine
Time frame: Inclusion
Microbiome measurements on saliva
Time frame: 1 year
Whole genome sequencing of blood
Time frame: 1 year
Whole genome sequencing of liver biopsy
Time frame: 1 year
Microbiome measurements on feces
Time frame: 1 year
Microbiome measurements on urine
Time frame: 1 year
Microbiome measurements on saliva
Time frame: 1 year
Microbiome measurements on urine
Time frame: 1 year
Microbiome measurements on feces
Time frame: 1 year
Microbiome measurements on saliva
Time frame: 1 year
Microbiome measurements on saliva
Time frame: 1 year
Microbiome measurements on urine
Time frame: 1 year
Microbiome measurements on feces
Time frame: 1 year
Microbiome measurements on saliva
Time frame: 1 year
Microbiome measurements on urine
Time frame: 1 year
Microbiome measurements on feces
Time frame: 2 years
Whole genome sequencing of blood
Time frame: 2 years
Whole genome sequencing of liver biopsy
Time frame: 2 years
Microbiome measurements on feces
Time frame: 2 years
Microbiome measurements on urine
Time frame: 2 years
Microbiome measurements on saliva
Time frame: 2 years
Microbiome measurements on saliva
Time frame: 2 years
Microbiome measurements on feces
Time frame: 2 years
Microbiome measurements on urine
Time frame: 2 years
Microbiome measurements on urine
Time frame: 2 years
Microbiome measurements on feces
Time frame: 2 years
Microbiome measurements on saliva
Time frame: 2 years
Microbiome measurements on urine
Time frame: 2 years
Microbiome measurements on saliva
Time frame: 2 years
Microbiome measurements on feces
Time frame: 6 years
Whole genome sequencing of blood
Time frame: 6 years
Whole genome sequencing of liver biopsy
Time frame: 6 years
Microbiome measurements on feces
Time frame: 6 years
Microbiome measurements on feces
Time frame: 6 years
Microbiome measurements on feces
Time frame: 6 years
Microbiome measurements on feces
Time frame: 6 years
Microbiome measurements on urine
Time frame: 6 years
Microbiome measurements on urine
Time frame: 6 years
Microbiome measurements on urine
Time frame: 6 years
Microbiome measurements on urine
Time frame: 6 years
Microbiome measurements on saliva
Time frame: 6 years
Microbiome measurements on saliva
Time frame: 6 years
Microbiome measurements on saliva
Time frame: 6 years
Microbiome measurements on saliva
Time frame: 11 years
Whole genome sequencing of blood
Time frame: 11 years
Whole genome sequencing of liver biopsy
Time frame: 11 years
Microbiome measurements on feces
Time frame: 11 years
Microbiome measurements on feces
Time frame: 11 years
Microbiome measurements on feces
Time frame: 11 years
Microbiome measurements on feces
Time frame: 11 years
Microbiome measurements on urine
Time frame: 11 years
Microbiome measurements on urine
Time frame: 11 years
Microbiome measurements on urine
Time frame: 11 years
Microbiome measurements on urine
Time frame: 11 years
Microbiome measurements on saliva
Time frame: 11 years
Microbiome measurements on saliva
Time frame: 11 years
Microbiome measurements on saliva
Time frame: 11 years
Microbiome measurements on saliva
Time frame: 16 years
Whole genome sequencing of blood
Time frame: 16 years
Whole genome sequencing of liver biopsy
Time frame: 16 years
Microbiome measurements on feces
Time frame: 16 years
Microbiome measurements on feces
Time frame: 16 years
Microbiome measurements on feces
Time frame: 16 years
Microbiome measurements on feces
Time frame: 16 years
Microbiome measurements on urine
Time frame: 16 years
Microbiome measurements on urine
Time frame: 16 years
Microbiome measurements on urine
Time frame: 16 years
Microbiome measurements on urine
Time frame: 16 years
Microbiome measurements on saliva
Time frame: 16 years
Microbiome measurements on saliva
Time frame: 16 years
Microbiome measurements on saliva
Time frame: 16 years
Microbiome measurements on saliva
Time frame: Inclusion
% of patients with anatomic anomalies on ultrasound of the heart
Time frame: Inclusion
% of patients with central lymph system anomaly
Time frame: Inclusion
Near Infrared Fluorescence of the lymph system
Time frame: 1 year
% of patients with anatomic anomalies on ultrasound of the heart
Time frame: 1 year
% of patients with central lymph system anomaly
Time frame: 1 year
Near Infrared Fluorescence of the lymph system
Time frame: 2 years
% of patients with anatomic anomalies on ultrasound of the heart
Time frame: 2 years
% of patients with central lymph system anomaly
Time frame: 2 years
Near Infrared Fluorescence of the lymph system
Time frame: 6 years
% of patients with anatomic anomalies on ultrasound of the heart
Time frame: 6 years
% of patients with central lymph system anomaly
Time frame: 6 years
Near Infrared Fluorescence of the lymph system
Time frame: 11 years
% of patients with anatomic anomalies on ultrasound of the heart
Time frame: 11 years
% of patients with central lymph system anomaly
Time frame: 11 years
Near Infrared Fluorescence of the lymph system
Time frame: 16 years
% of patients with anatomic anomalies on ultrasound of the heart
Time frame: 16 years
% of patients with central lymph system anomaly
Time frame: 16 years
Near Infrared Fluorescence of the lymph system
Time frame: Inclusion
Accelerometer measurements
Time frame: 1 year
Accelerometer measurements
Time frame: 2 years
Accelerometer measurements
Time frame: 6 years
Accelerometer measurements
Time frame: 11 years
Accelerometer measurements
Time frame: 16 years
Accelerometer measurements
Time frame: Inclusion
% of patients with liver fibrosis measured with ultrasound
Time frame: Inclusion
Level of liver fibrosis (grade 0-4)
Time frame: Inclusion
Liver fibrosis status
Time frame: Inclusion
Liver fibrosis status
Time frame: Inclusion
Standard liver evaluation
Time frame: Inclusion
Standard liver evaluation
Time frame: Inclusion
Standard liver evaluation
Time frame: Inclusion
Standard liver evaluation
Time frame: Inclusion
Standard liver evaluation
Time frame: Inclusion
Standard liver evaluation
Time frame: Inclusion
Standard liver evaluation
Time frame: Inclusion
Standard liver evaluation
Time frame: Inclusion
Standard liver evaluation
Time frame: 1 year
% of patients with liver fibrosis measured with ultrasound
Time frame: 1 year
Liver fibrosis status
Time frame: 1 year
Liver fibrosis status
Time frame: 1 year
Standard liver evaluation
Time frame: 1 year
Standard liver evaluation
Time frame: 1 year
Standard liver evaluation
Time frame: 1 year
Standard liver evaluation
Time frame: 1 year
Standard liver evaluation
Time frame: 1 year
Standard liver evaluation
Time frame: 1 year
Standard liver evaluation
Time frame: 1 year
Standard liver evaluation
Time frame: 1 year
Standard liver evaluation
Time frame: 1 year
Level of liver fibrosis (grade 0-4)
Time frame: 2 years
% of patients with liver fibrosis measured with ultrasound
Time frame: 2 years
Liver fibrosis status
Time frame: 2 years
Liver fibrosis status
Time frame: 2 years
Level of liver fibrosis (grade 0-4)
Time frame: 2 years
Standard liver evaluation
Time frame: 2 years
Standard liver evaluation
Time frame: 2 years
Standard liver evaluation
Time frame: 2 years
Standard liver evaluation
Time frame: 2 years
Standard liver evaluation
Time frame: 2 years
Standard liver evaluation
Time frame: 2 years
Standard liver evaluation
Time frame: 2 years
Standard liver evaluation
Time frame: 2 years
Standard liver evaluation
Time frame: 6 years
% of patients with liver fibrosis measured with ultrasound
Time frame: 6 years
Level of liver fibrosis (grade 0-4)
Time frame: 6 years
Liver fibrosis status
Time frame: 6 years
Liver fibrosis status
Time frame: 6 years
Standard liver evaluation
Time frame: 6 years
Standard liver evaluation
Time frame: 6 years
Standard liver evaluation
Time frame: 6 years
Standard liver evaluation
Time frame: 6 years
Standard liver evaluation
Time frame: 6 years
Standard liver evaluation
Time frame: 6 years
Standard liver evaluation
Time frame: 6 years
Standard liver evaluation
Time frame: 6 years
Standard liver evaluation
Time frame: 11 years
% of patients with liver fibrosis measured with ultrasound
Time frame: 11 years
Level of liver fibrosis (grade 0-4)
Time frame: 11 years
Liver fibrosis status
Time frame: 11 years
Liver fibrosis status
Time frame: 11 years
Standard liver evaluation
Time frame: 11 years
Standard liver evaluation
Time frame: 11 years
Standard liver evaluation
Time frame: 11 years
Standard liver evaluation
Time frame: 11 years
Standard liver evaluation
Time frame: 11 years
Standard liver evaluation
Time frame: 11 years
Standard liver evaluation
Time frame: 11 years
Standard liver evaluation
Time frame: 11 years
Standard liver evaluation
Time frame: 16 years
% of patients with liver fibrosis measured with ultrasound
Time frame: 16 years
Level of liver fibrosis (grade 0-4)
Time frame: 16 years
Liver fibrosis status
Time frame: 16 years
Liver fibrosis status
Time frame: 16 years
Standard liver evaluation
Time frame: 16 years
Standard liver evaluation
Time frame: 16 years
Standard liver evaluation
Time frame: 16 years
Standard liver evaluation
Time frame: 16 years
Standard liver evaluation
Time frame: 16 years
Standard liver evaluation
Time frame: 16 years
Standard liver evaluation
Time frame: 16 years
Standard liver evaluation
Time frame: 16 years
Standard liver evaluation
Time frame: Inclusion
Incidence of spider angioma
Time frame: 1 year
Incidence of spider angioma
Time frame: 2 years
Incidence of spider angioma
Time frame: 6 years
Incidence of spider angioma
Time frame: 11 years
Incidence of spider angioma
Time frame: 16 years
Incidence of spider angioma
Time frame: Inclusion
Incidence of ascitis
Time frame: 1 year
Incidence of ascitis
Time frame: 2 years
Incidence of ascitis
Time frame: 6 years
Incidence of ascitis
Time frame: 11 years
Incidence of ascitis
Time frame: 16 years
Incidence of ascitis
Time frame: Inclusion
Incidence of palmar erythema
Time frame: 1 year
Incidence of palmar erythema
Time frame: 2 years
Incidence of palmar erythema
Time frame: 6 years
Incidence of palmar erythema
Time frame: 11 years
Incidence of palmar erythema
Time frame: 16 years
Incidence of palmar erythema
Time frame: Inclusion
cm
Time frame: 1 year
cm
Time frame: 2 years
cm
Time frame: 6 years
cm
Time frame: 11 years
cm
Time frame: 16 years
cm
Time frame: Inclusion
kg
Time frame: 1 year
kg
Time frame: 2 years
kg
Time frame: 6 years
kg
Time frame: 11 years
kg
Time frame: 16 years
kg
Time frame: Inclusion
mm
Time frame: 1 year
mm
Time frame: 2 years
mm
Time frame: 6 years
mm
Time frame: 11 years
mm
Time frame: 16 years
mm
Time frame: Inclusion
cm
Time frame: 1 year
cm
Time frame: 2 years
cm
Time frame: 6 years
cm
Time frame: 11 years
cm
Time frame: 16 years
cm
Time frame: Inclusion
Time frame: 1 year
Time frame: 2 years
Time frame: 6 years
Time frame: 11 years
Time frame: 16 years
Time frame: Inclusion
Insulin-like growth factor 1
Time frame: 1 year
Insulin-like growth factor 1
Time frame: 2 years
Insulin-like growth factor 1
Time frame: 6 years
Insulin-like growth factor 1
Time frame: 11 years
Insulin-like growth factor 1
Time frame: 16 years
Insulin-like growth factor 1
Time frame: Inclusion
Time frame: 1 year
Time frame: 2 years
Time frame: 6 years
Time frame: 11 years
Time frame: 16 years
Time frame: Inclusion
Time frame: 1 year
Time frame: 2 years
Time frame: 6 years
Time frame: 11 years
Time frame: 16 years
Time frame: Inclusion
Time frame: 1 year
Time frame: 2 years
Time frame: 6 years
Time frame: 11 years
Time frame: 16 years
Time frame: Inclusion
Glomerular Filtration Rate Measured by 51 Cr-EDTA Clearance
Time frame: 1 year
Glomerular Filtration Rate Measured by 51 Cr-EDTA Clearance
Time frame: 2 years
Glomerular Filtration Rate Measured by 51 Cr-EDTA Clearance
Time frame: 6 years
Glomerular Filtration Rate Measured by 51 Cr-EDTA Clearance
Time frame: 11 years
Glomerular Filtration Rate Measured by 51 Cr-EDTA Clearance
Time frame: 16 years
Glomerular Filtration Rate Measured by 51 Cr-EDTA Clearance
Time frame: Inclusion
Level of antibodies
Time frame: 1 year
Level of antibodies
Time frame: 2 years
Level of antibodies
Time frame: 6 years
Level of antibodies
Time frame: 11 years
Level of antibodies
Time frame: 16 years
Level of antibodies
Time frame: Inclusion
Recent thymic emigrants
Time frame: 1 year
Recent thymic emigrants
Time frame: 2 years
Recent thymic emigrants
Time frame: 6 years
Recent thymic emigrants
Time frame: 11 years
Recent thymic emigrants
Time frame: 16 years
Recent thymic emigrants
Time frame: Inclusion
T-cell differentiation
Time frame: 1 year
T-cell differentiation
Time frame: 2 years
T-cell differentiation
Time frame: 6 years
T-cell differentiation
Time frame: 11 years
T-cell differentiation
Time frame: 16 years
T-cell differentiation
Time frame: Inclusion
Time frame: 1 year
Time frame: 2 years
Time frame: 6 years
Time frame: 11 years
Time frame: 16 years
Time frame: Inclusion
Time frame: 1 year
Time frame: 2 years
Time frame: 6 years
Time frame: 11 years
Time frame: 16 years
Time frame: Inclusion
level of EBV DNA present
Time frame: 1 year
level of EBV DNA present
Time frame: 2 years
level of EBV DNA present
Time frame: 6 years
level of EBV DNA present
Time frame: 11 years
level of EBV DNA present
Time frame: 16 years
level of EBV DNA present
Time frame: Inclusion
level of CMV DNA present
Time frame: 1 year
level of CMV DNA present
Time frame: 2 years
level of CMV DNA present
Time frame: 6 years
level of CMV DNA present
Time frame: 11 years
level of CMV DNA present
Time frame: 16 years
level of CMV DNA present
Time frame: Inclusion
Hepatic extraction fraction
Time frame: 1 year
Hepatic extraction fraction
Time frame: 2 years
Hepatic extraction fraction
Time frame: 6 years
Hepatic extraction fraction
Time frame: 11 years
Hepatic extraction fraction
Time frame: 16 years
Hepatic extraction fraction
Time frame: Inclusion
Liver stiffness
Time frame: 1 year
Liver stiffness
Time frame: 2 years
Liver stiffness
Time frame: 6 years
Liver stiffness
Time frame: 11 years
Liver stiffness
Time frame: 16 years
Liver stiffness
Time frame: Inclusion
Liver stiffness (number)
Time frame: 1 year
Liver stiffness (number)
Time frame: 2 years
Liver stiffness (number)
Time frame: 6 years
Liver stiffness (number)
Time frame: 11 years
Liver stiffness (number)
Time frame: 16 years
Liver stiffness (number)
Time frame: Inclusion
Time frame: 1 year
Time frame: 2 years
Time frame: 6 years
Time frame: 11 years
Time frame: 16 years
Time frame: Inclusion
Time frame: 1 year
Time frame: 2 years
Time frame: 6 years
Time frame: 11 years
Time frame: 16 years
Time frame: Inclusion
Thymic index (measurement of size)
Time frame: 1 year
Thymic index (measurement of size)
Time frame: 2 years
Thymic index (measurement of size)
Time frame: 6 years
Thymic index (measurement of size)
Time frame: 11 years
Thymic index (measurement of size)
Time frame: 16 years
Thymic index (measurement of size)
Time frame: Inclusion
Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry
Time frame: 1 year
Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry
Time frame: 2 years
Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry
Time frame: 6 years
Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry
Time frame: 11 years
Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry
Time frame: 16 years
Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry
Time frame: Inclusion
Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Higher scores indicate better quality of life, from 0-100
Time frame: 1 year
Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Higher scores indicate better quality of life, from 0-100
Time frame: 2 years
Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Higher scores indicate better quality of life, from 0-100
Time frame: 6 years
Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Higher scores indicate better quality of life, from 0-100
Time frame: 11 years
Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Higher scores indicate better quality of life, from 0-100
Time frame: 16 years
Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Higher scores indicate better quality of life, from 0-100
Time frame: Inclusion
Time frame: 1 year
Time frame: 2 years
Time frame: 6 years
Time frame: 11 years
Time frame: 16 years
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Rigshospitalet, Denmark
Other
BILACO Trial: Biliary Atresia - a Severe Complex Congenital Liver Disease With High Mortality, Compromised Neurological Development, Severe Malnutrition and Unknown Etiology
Acronym: BILACO
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04272515
Bile Duct Diseases, Biliary Atresia
Paris, De, France
View Trial DetailsNCT07697872
Bile Duct Diseases, Biliary Atresia
Birmingham, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT00345553
Bile Duct Diseases, Biliary Atresia
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00061828
Bile Duct Diseases, Biliary Atresia
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial Details