Mechanical embolectomy
ProcedureMechanical embolectomy with Solitaire stentriever in conjunction with manual aspiration
NCT Number: NCT02737189
Endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke has shown strong benefit in several prospective randomized trials in the anterior circulation and endovascular therapy for basilar artery occlusion has shown promising results in several single-arm studies. This has led to a broad adoption of these techniques which are now considered standard of care in many institutions despite the lack of adequate evidence to prove their benefit. Indeed, the rates of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage in these studies have consistently been around 5% which raises the question as to whether patients could actually be harmed as opposed to helped by these procedures. This is a prospective, multi-center, randomized, controlled, open, blinded-endpoint trial, with the aim to evaluate the hypothesis that mechanical embolectomy with the Solitaire device is superior to medical management alone in achieving better outcomes in subjects presenting with an acute ischemic stroke caused by occlusion of the basilar artery within 6-24 hours from symptom onset.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–80 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Baotou Central Hospital, Baotou, China
Study Objective: To evaluate the hypothesis that mechanical embolectomy with the Solitaire device is superior to medical management alone in achieving favourable outcomes defined as modified Rankin score (mRS) 0-3 at 90 days in subjects presenting with ischemic stroke due to basilar artery occlusion up to 24 hours from symptom onset.
Subject Population: Subjects presenting with acute ischemic stroke within 6-24 hours from symptom onset/last seen well and whose strokes are attributable to an occlusion of the basilar artery. Subjects are either ineligible for IV alteplase or have received IV alteplase therapy without recanalization. The randomization employs a 1:1 ratio of mechanical embolectomy with Solitaire stentriever in conjunction with manual aspiration versus medical management alone. Randomization will be done under a stratification process using age, baseline National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and therapeutic window. For the primary endpoint, subjects will be followed for 90 days post-randomization.Sample size is projected to be 318 patients.
Care providers: Vascular neurologists and trained interventional neuroradiologists or neurologists in certified comprehensive stroke centers that treat more than 500 acute stroke patients and perform more than 30 acute mechanical thrombectomies every year will treat patients. Neurointerventionalists have to have previously performed at least 10 thrombectomies with Solitaire device in acute ischemic stroke patients.
Interventions: Patients in both arms will be admitted at acute stroke units (or Intensive Care Unit if needed) and treated following the Chinese Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke. Concomitant medications and non-pharmacological therapies will be recorded. If a decision of stopping support life measures is adopted, this will be recorded in the Case Report Form (CRF).A maximum of six attempts to retrieve the thrombus in a single vessel can be made with any Solitaire device or aspiration. In case an atherosclerotic lesion is found underlying the occlusive lesion angioplasty/stenting through detachment of the Solitaire device will be allowed.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
General Exclusion Criteria:
Neuroimaging Exclusion Criteria:
Mechanical embolectomy with Solitaire stentriever in conjunction with manual aspiration
Best Medical Treatment and maximum supportive care, not including mechanical thrombectomy, no intra arterial treatment
Time frame: 90 days
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the hypothesis that mechanical embolectomy with the Solitaire device is superior to medical management alone in achieving favourable outcomes (mRS ≤ 3) at 90 days in subjects presenting with an acute ischemic stroke caused by occlusion of the basilar artery within 6-24 hours from symptom onset.
Time frame: 24 (-2/+12) hours
Dramatic early favorable response as determined by an National Institute of Health stroke scale (NIHSS) of 0-2 or NIHSS improvement ≥ 8 points at 24 (-2/+12) hours.
Time frame: 90 days
Time frame: 12 months
Time frame: 24 hours (-2/+12 hours)
Infarct volume evaluated on Computed Tomography (CT) or Magnetic Resonance (MR) at 24 hours (-2/+12 hours)
Time frame: 24 hours (-2/+12 hours)
Vessel recanalization at 24 hours (-2/+12 hours) in both treatment groups assessed by using Arterial Occlusive Lesion (AOL) grades
Time frame: 90 days
Time frame: 90 days
Time frame: 90 days
Time frame: 3 month, 6 months and 1 year
Quality of life analysis as measured by EuroQol/EQ5D and SF-36 at 3 month, 6 months and 1 year, between interventional therapy vs medical therapy alone
Time frame: at 90 days
Time frame: 24 (-2/+12) hours
Time frame: 1 year
Time frame: 90 days
Time frame: Immediate Post-Endovascular Treatment
Successful recanalization is defined as TICI (Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction) 2b or 3 in the post-procedure angiography.
Time frame: Perioperative period
arterial perforation, arterial dissection, embolization in a previously uninvolved vascular territory and so on.
Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing
Other
Randomized Trial of Revascularization With Solitaire Stentriever Versus Best Medical Therapy in the Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke Due to Basilar Artery Occlusion Presenting Within 6-24 Hours of Symptom Onset
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07345702
Basilar Artery Occlusion, Brain Diseases
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
View Trial DetailsNCT05105633
Basilar Artery Occlusion, Brain Diseases
Bankstown, New South Wales, Australia
View Trial DetailsNCT07046299
Basilar Artery Occlusion, Brain Diseases
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
View Trial DetailsNCT06101667
Acute Ischemic Stroke, Basilar Artery Occlusion
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
View Trial Details