Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT07539246

Barrier-Step Action in Elite Futsal Goalkeepers

This observational case series examined the barrier-step action in elite futsal goalkeepers. The aim was to describe how this goalkeeper-specific defensive movement was organised in time and how selected body angles were configured during execution. Three male professional futsal goalkeepers with international experience each performed three valid dominant-side trials under standardised indoor conditions. The task involved responding to a standardised low ball stimulus delivered by the coach from the penalty mark at a distance of 5 m.

Video data were recorded using a GoPro Hero 10 camera operating at 240 frames per second and analysed frame by frame in Kinovea. The movement was segmented into three operational intervals: initiation-propulsion, lateral transfer, and terminal support-stabilisation. Projected shoulder, hip, knee, and ankle angles were extracted at two analytically defined instants: the end of Interval 1 and the blocking configuration reached during Interval 2. Descriptive statistics were used to characterise between-goalkeeper variation and within-goalkeeper consistency in the barrier-step action.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

Male

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Tecnológico de Antioquia

Guarne, Antioquia, 054080, Colombia

About this study

This study was designed as an exploratory descriptive observational case series aimed at characterising selected projected two-dimensional kinematic features of the barrier-step action in elite futsal goalkeepers. Given the limited biomechanical description of this goalkeeper-specific defensive movement, the purpose was to provide an initial field-based account of its temporal organisation and selected joint-angle configurations rather than to test inferential hypotheses.

Three male professional futsal goalkeepers with international representation were purposively recruited. Each participant completed three valid dominant-side trials in response to a standardised low ball stimulus delivered by the coach from the penalty mark at a distance of 5 m. To reduce between-trial variability in the initial condition, each repetition began with a standardised movement towards the opposite post. The analytical sequence began only after completion of this manoeuvre.

All trials were recorded using a GoPro Hero 10 camera operating at 240 frames per second. The camera was mounted on a tripod at a height of 0.9 m and positioned 6 m from the movement area, with the optical axis aligned as closely as possible to the primary plane of motion. Because the study relied on single-camera two-dimensional video analysis, all outputs were interpreted as projected image-plane measures rather than true three-dimensional joint kinematics.

For analytical purposes, the movement was segmented into three operational intervals: initiation-propulsion, lateral transfer, and terminal support-stabilisation. Angular variables were extracted at two analytical instants: the end of Interval 1 and the blocking configuration reached during Interval 2. The projected angular variables were shoulder, hip, knee, and ankle angles. Temporal variables included the duration of each operational interval. Video analysis was performed frame by frame in Kinovea by a single investigator, and intra-rater reliability was assessed by repeated analysis after a 7-day interval. Descriptive statistics were used throughout to characterise temporal organisation, angular configuration, and between-goalkeeper variation in the barrier-step action.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male futsal goalkeeper
  • Competing at professional level
  • International competitive experience
  • Able to perform the standardised barrier-step assessment task under indoor conditions
  • Able to complete three valid dominant-side trials
  • Provided written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Failure to meet the inclusion criteria
  • Inability to complete the standardised assessment task
  • Inability to complete three valid dominant-side trials
  • Video recordings in which the full movement sequence or required analytical landmarks could not be identified frame by frame

Treatment and study plan

Standardised barrier-step assessment task

Other

Participants performed the barrier-step action in response to a standardised low ball stimulus delivered by the coach from the penalty mark at a distance of 5 m. Each participant completed three valid dominant-side trials under standardised indoor conditions, and the movement was analysed using single-camera two-dimensional video.

Primary outcomes

  1. Interval-specific temporal organisation of the barrier-step action

    Time frame: Assessed during the single biomechanical assessment session on September 7, 2021

    Duration of initiation-propulsion, lateral transfer, and terminal support-stabilisation, expressed in seconds and derived from frame-by-frame analysis of 240-Hz video recordings.

  2. Projected joint-angle configuration during the barrier-step action

    Time frame: Assessed during the single biomechanical assessment session on September 7, 2021, at analytical instant 1 and analytical instant 2

    Projected shoulder, hip, knee, and ankle angles extracted from two analytically defined instants: the end of Interval 1 and the blocking configuration reached during Interval 2.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Relative temporal contribution of each movement interval

    Time frame: Assessed during the single biomechanical assessment session on September 7, 2021

    Percentage contribution of Interval 1, Interval 2, and Interval 3 to total sequence duration.

  2. Angular change from Interval 1 to Interval 2

    Time frame: Assessed during the single biomechanical assessment session on September 7, 2021, from analytical instant 1 to analytical instant 2

    Change in projected ankle, knee, hip, and shoulder angles from the end of Interval 1 to the blocking configuration reached during Interval 2.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Federal University of Vicosa

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Temporal Organisation and Projected Two-Dimensional Kinematics of the Barrier-Step Action in Elite Futsal Goalkeepers: An Observational Case Series

Acronym: BARRIER-STEP-F

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2021
Study completion
2021
First posted
Apr 20, 2026
Registry last updated
Apr 21, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.