Augment® Injectable Bone Graft
DeviceImplantation of up to 9cc of Augment® Injectable Bone Graft
NCT Number: NCT01305356
STUDY OBJECTIVES:
To demonstrate equivalent clinical and radiologic outcomes as "gold standard" (Autologous Bone Graft) in a representative clinical model (hindfoot fusions)
STUDY HYPOTHESIS:
Augment® Injectable is an equivalent bone grafting substitute to autologous bone graft in applications as shown by superiority analysis for safety and non-inferiority analysis for effectiveness
STUDY RATIONALE:
To evaluate a fully synthetic bone graft material to facilitate fusion in conditions or injuries requiring bone graft in a representative clinical fusion model and thus the opportunity to provide equivalent union rates as Autologous Bone Graft without necessitating an additional invasive procedure to harvest the graft
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Life Mark Health Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
STUDY DESIGN:
Prospective, randomized, controlled, non-inferiority, multi-center trial
NUMBER OF STUDY CENTERS:
25
NUMBER OF SUBJECTS:
299 Subjects (see "Study Population"). The subject population included subjects enrolled in 3 separate Clinical Trials. (BMTI-2006-01, BMTI-2009-01, and BMTI-2010-01)
STUDY POPULATION:
Male and female subjects 18 years of age or older requiring a hindfoot fusion procedure involving a bone grafting procedure.
TREATMENT GROUPS:
Group I: Standard Rigid Fixation + Autologous Bone Graft Group II: Standard Rigid Fixation + Augment® Injectable Bone Graft
Subjects will be randomized in a 2:1 ratio (Augment® Injectable:Autologous Bone Graft).
ROUTE OF ADMINISTRATION:
Investigational device is manually implanted inside and around the fusion space to ensure Augment® Injectable Bone Graft (beta-TCP/bovine collagen matrix +rhPDGF-BB) or autologous bone graft is contained within the joint space
STUDY DURATION:
Twenty-four month follow-up post-surgery
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
KEY INCLUSION CRITERIA:
KEY EXCLUSION CRITERIA:
Implantation of up to 9cc of Augment® Injectable Bone Graft
Implantation of up to 9cc of autologous bone graft
Time frame: Baseline, 9, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 52 weeks
Subjects were asked to stand and report pain on a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (with 0 being no pain and 100 being worst pain imaginable).
Time frame: Baseline, 9, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 52 weeks
The Foot Function Index (FFI) measures the impact of foot pathology on function in terms of pain, disability and activity restriction. The FFI is a self-administered index consisting of 23 items divided into 3 sub-scales all ranging from 0-100. To obtain a sub-scale score, the item scores for a sub-scale are totaled and then divided by the maximum total possible for all of the sub-scale items which the subject indicated were applicable. Any item marked as not applicable is excluded from the total possible. Sub-scales are an average of the completed ratings within that sub-scale. The total foot function score is an average of the three sub-scale scores and ranges from 0-100. Lower scores are indicative of better outcomes whereas higher scores indicate greater impairment.
Time frame: Baseline, 9, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 52 weeks
Subjects were asked to report pain, functionality and ability levels while the physician performed assessments based on alignment, abnormality, motion, and stability. The total score ranges from a low of zero to a high of 100, with subscales measuring pain (40 points), function (50 points), and alignment (10 points), with higher scores showing better outcomes.
Time frame: Baseline, 9, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 52 weeks
Subjects were asked to report current pain level at the fusion site on a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (with 0 being no pain and 100 being worst pain imaginable).
Time frame: Baseline, 9, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 52 weeks
The SF-12 Physical Component Score is a validated quality of life metric with a minimum of zero and a maximum of 100, with higher scores denoting higher quality of life.
BioMimetic Therapeutics
Industry
A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Multi-Center, Pivotal Human Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Augment® Injectable Bone Graft Compared to Autologous Bone Graft as a Bone Regeneration Device in Hindfoot Fusions
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06235710
Arthritis, Arthritis, Rheumatoid
Brunssum, Limburg, Netherlands
View Trial DetailsNCT00819481
Arthritis, Arthritis, Rheumatoid
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06564636
Arthritis, Avascular Necrosis
San Francisco, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02686528
Arthritis, Degenerative Joint Disease
Chicago, Illinois, United States
View Trial Details