Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrotomy tube placement
Deviceplacement of the PEG tube depends on arm
NCT Number: NCT04019548
Open-label, interventional, multicentric, randomized, phase III study. Cancer studied is the oropharyngeal cancer.
Study is composed by 2 arms of subjects: prophylactic or reactive percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement.
All subjects will be treated with a cisplatin standard chemotherapy regimen and by simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
CHU Saint Pierre, Brussels, Belgium
Open-label, interventional, multicentric, randomized, phase III study. Cancer studied is the oropharyngeal cancer.
Study is composed by 2 arms of subjects (male or female): prophylactic or reactive percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement.
The arm will be allocated by randomisation (1:1).
All subjects will be treated with a cisplatin standard chemotherapy regimen and by simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).
Cisplatin: Two therapeutic regimens are allowed:
Radiotherapy: The median dose prescription will be 32 x 2.16 Gy to the high risk PTV and 32 x 1.75 Gy to the elective PTV.
Medical device: The medical device used in this trial is a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube with the CE label: CE0120. The medical device is used in the indication of the notice.
The estimated number of subjects to screen is 121 patients for an estimated number of 110 patients randomised for 100 evaluable patients.
The end of study will be declared when all the following criteria will have been met:
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
placement of the PEG tube depends on arm
Two therapeutic regimen allowed:
Simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). The median dose prescription will be 32 x 2.16 Gy to the high risk PTV and 32 x 1.75 Gy to the elective PTV.
Time frame: at 6 months after end of treatment
The M.D.Anderson Dysphagia inventory is a dysphagia-specific quality-of-life questionnaire for patients with H&N cancer including 20 items divided into 4 subscales emotional (6 questions), functional (5 questions), physical (8 questions) and one global question. Each subscale has a score ranging from 1 to 5 (higher scores represent a better outcome). The mean score of the 20 items will be multiplied by a factor of 20 to obtain a MDADI total score which ranges from 20 (extremely low functioning) to 100 (high functioning). A difference of 8 points in MDADI score is considered as the Minimal Clinically Important Difference for the trial.
Time frame: Baseline; at week 3 & 6 during treatment; at 1,3, 6, 12 and 24 months after end of treatment
Outcome measure: completion of EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire
Time frame: Baseline; at week 3 & 6 during treatment; at 1,3, 6, 12 and 24 months after end of treatment
Outcome measure: completion of EORTC QLQ-H&N43 module questionnaire
Time frame: Baseline; at week 3 & 6 during treatment; at 1,3, 6, 12 and 24 months after end of treatment
Outcome measure: completion of FACT-HN questionnaire
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 38 months
Outcome measure: Incidence, type and severity of all adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events according to CTCAE version 5.0 ;
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 38 months
Outcome measure:Incidence, type and severity of radiotherapy related AEs also according to Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) / European Organisation for Research and treatment of Cancer (EORTC) scores; In the RTOG/EORTC Late Radiation Morbidity Scoring, 0 means an absence of radiation effects and 5 means the effects led to death. The severity of reactions is graded from 1 through 4.
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 38 months
Outcome measure:Severity of oropharyngeal mucositis and swallowing disorders according to Internal consensus scale (ICS);
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 38 months
Outcome measure: Oropharyngeal mucositis according to the oral mucositis weekly questionnaire-Head and Neck cancer (OMWQ-NH) completed by the subject;
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 38 months
Outcome measure: Salivary toxicity according to the xerostomia questionnaire completed by the subject.
Time frame: Baseline, during treatment period (7 weeks) and follow-up period (24 months)
Outcome measure: Clinical dietitian assessment including risk screening by Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002)
Time frame: Baseline, during treatment period (7 weeks) and follow-up period (24 months)
Outcome measure: Clinical dietitian assessment using GLIM criteria (Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition criteria).
Time frame: at 3 and 12 months after end of treatment
Outcome measure:Tumour response after study treatment measured by DECT and PET-CT
Time frame: at 3, 12 and 36 months after end of treatment
Outcome measure: loco regional control (LRC)
Time frame: at 3, 12 and 36 months after end of treatment
Outcome measure: distant recurrence/distant progression (DR/DP)
Time frame: at 3, 12 and 36 months after end of treatment
Outcome measure: second primary (SP)
Time frame: at 3, 12 and 36 months after end of treatment
Outcome measure: disease-free survival (DFS)
Time frame: at 3, 12 and 36 months after end of treatment
Outcome measure: disease specific survival (DSS)
Time frame: at 3, 12 and 36 months after end of treatment
Outcome measure: overall survival (OS)
Time frame: Baseline, at week 3 and at 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after the end of treatment.
Outcome measure: Assessment of the smoking consumption
Time frame: at screening
Outcome measure: HPV/p16 status
Time frame: during the pre-study treatment period (within 15 days after randomisation and before starting study treatment) and at 12 months after end of treatment
Outcome measure: EuroQol 5D5L Questionnaire
Time frame: at 6 months after treatment
HPV-based prognostic nomogram for oro-pharyngeal carcinoma
Time frame: at 6 months after treatment
prediction tool for swallowing dysfunction, xerostomia, sticky saliva and tube feeding dependence
Jules Bordet Institute
Other
Patient Reported Outcomes in Term of Swallowing and Quality of Life After Prophylactic Versus Reactive Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Placement in Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer Patients Treated With Definitive Chemo-radiotherapy
Acronym: SwallPEG
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05451004
Head and Neck Neoplasms, Neoplasms
Corona, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02012699
Abdominal Neoplasms, Adenoma
Greenwood Village, Colorado, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06747390
Carcinoma, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06445114
Carcinoma, Head and Neck Neoplasms
Beverly Hills, California, United States
View Trial Details