Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02820181

Assessment of a Novel Tracheostomy Tie

Tracheotomy is a common procedure for multiple medical indications.Tracheostomy tubes must be securely fixed to prevent movement or decannulation and tracheostomy ties must be exchanged as needed. However, the process of ties exchange is always risky and complicated. A novel tracheostomy tie has been designed to ensure the safety during exchanging and conveniences of cleaning. This study is to determine if the new device is better than the old one.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–60 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

The First Affiliated Hospital of Shanxi Medical University

Taiyuan, Shanxi, 030000, China

About this study

Tracheotomy is a common procedure for multiple medical indications. Nursing staff must understand the immediate postoperative and long-term management of tracheostomy patients. To provide safe and competent care, tracheostomy tubes must be taken care of carefully, including cleaning or changing the inner cannula, caring for the stoma, suctioning at least 3 times a day, and replacing tracheostomy ties according to facility-specific policy as needed. However, to avoid inadvertent dislodgement of the tracheostomy tube, the process of ties exchange is always risky and complicated, which request one person to hold the tube in place while a second person performs the tie exchange.

The investigators designed a novel tracheostomy tie to ensure the safety during exchanging and conveniences of cleaning, the primary feature of which is double belts and easy to operate. This randomized controlled trial is to determine if the new device is better than the traditional one.

Sixty tracheotomy patients without an existing neck injury will be recruited . Patients in experimental group wear a novel tracheostomy tie. The traditional one was used in control group. Difficulty level of exchanging or cleaning the tracheostomy ties, degree of comfort, skin breakdown and the actually frequency of exchanging will be evaluated.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subjects ≥ 18 years old and ≤ 60 years old;
  • Patients with a tracheostomy;
  • With intact neck skin;
  • Willingly signs the Informed Consent;
  • Is qualified to participate in the opinion of the Investigator;
  • Without disorders of consciousness.

Exclusion criteria

  • With an existing neck injury or infection or clinically significant skin diseases on the application site which may contraindicate participation, including psoriasis, eczema, atopic dermatitis, active cancer;
  • With damaged skin or conditions on the application site which includes sunburn, scars, moles or other disfiguration of the test site;
  • Has a known or stated allergy to adhesive bandages, or any of the product types being tested;
  • Uses of topical drugs on the application site;
  • Uses lotions, creams or oils on the application site;
  • Can not communicate with nurses or doctors for any reasons

Treatment and study plan

novel tracheostomy bi-ties

Device

The investigators designed a novel tracheostomy bi-tie to ensure the safety and conveniences during exchanging and cleaning them, the primary feature of which is double belts and easy to operate.

traditional Tracheostomy ties

Device

Traditionally, the tracheostomy tube is fixed using ordinary tracheostomy ties made of medical bandage or long strands.

Primary outcomes

  1. Visual Analogue Scale to Measure the Difficulty Level of Exchanging or Cleaning the Tracheostomy Ties (0 to 10 ) Higher Scores Mean a Worse Outcome

    Time frame: 14days

    Nurses will be evaluated by Visual Analogue Scale/Score to measure the difficulty level of exchanging or cleaning the tracheostomy ties.

    Title: Visual Analogue Scale to measure the difficulty level of exchanging or cleaning the tracheostomy ties (0 to 10 ) Higher scores mean a worse outcome

  2. Number of Participants With Local Skin Breakdown

    Time frame: 14days

    Scale for breakdown of neck skin wound was rated as mild, moderate, or severe. "Mild" wounds included fragile skin that was erythematous or had a small amount of breakdown (<1 cm in diameter). Wounds with evident skin erosion or breakdown associated with drainage and/or pain were classified as "moderate." "Severe" wounds were defined as a partial-thickness loss of dermis presenting as a shallow open ulcer with a red-pink wound bed.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Visual Analogue Scale of Comfort of Patients During Wearing or Exchanging Tracheostomy Ties (0-10) Higher Scores Mean Worse Outcome.

    Time frame: 14days

    Visual Analogue Scale/Score will be used to measure the degree of comfort of patients during wearing or exchanging tracheostomy ties Title: Visual Analogue Scale of comfort of patients during wearing or exchanging tracheostomy ties(0-10) Higher scores mean worse outcome.

  2. Objective Index:the Actually Frequency of Exchanging Dressing

    Time frame: 14days

    The record of the frequency of exchanging dressing under the tracheostomy ties in practice will be collected

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

The First Affiliated Hospital of Shanxi Medical University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Assessment of Functionality and Performance of a Novel Tracheostomy Tie

Acronym: AONTT

Important dates

Study start
2016
Primary completion
2019
Study completion
2019
First posted
Jun 30, 2016
Registry last updated
Nov 2, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.