Acibadem Atasehir Hastanesi
Istanbul, Ataturk Mahallesi, 34660, Turkey (Türkiye)
NCT Number: NCT07392294
This study compares two types of wound dressings used after tracheostomy surgery in children: standard foam dressing and silver-impregnated foam dressing.
Tracheostomy is a surgical procedure that creates an opening in the neck to help children breathe. Skin problems around the tracheostomy site are common, occurring in up to 29% of pediatric patients.
The purpose of this study is to determine if silver-impregnated foam dressing is better than standard foam dressing in preventing skin complications around the tracheostomy site.
Fifty children (ages 0-18 years) undergoing tracheostomy surgery were randomly assigned to receive either standard foam dressing or silver-impregnated foam dressing. All patients received the same standardized wound care. Patients were followed for one month after surgery.
The main outcome measured was the rate of skin complications. Secondary outcomes included pressure ulcer risk assessment using the Braden Q Scale and wound staging using the National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel classification.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me0 year–18 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Istanbul, Ataturk Mahallesi, 34660, Turkey (Türkiye)
Peristomal skin complications represent a significant concern following pediatric tracheostomy, with reported incidence rates up to 29%. These complications include pressure ulcers, infections, granulation tissue, and skin breakdown.
This prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted at a single tertiary care center. Fifty pediatric patients undergoing elective tracheostomy were enrolled and randomly assigned to one of two groups:
Group A (n=25): Standard foam dressing Group B (n=25): Silver-impregnated foam dressing
All patients received a standardized postoperative care protocol including:
Patients were assessed on postoperative days 1, 7, 14, 21, and 30. Pressure ulcer risk was evaluated using the Braden Q Risk Assessment Scale, and any pressure injuries were staged according to the National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel (NPIAP) classification system.
This is the first randomized controlled trial comparing these dressing types using validated, standardized assessment tools in pediatric tracheostomy patients.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
DescriptionStandard foam dressing applied under tracheostomy cannula. Dressings were changed when 75% saturated with secretions or left in place up to 7 days if dry.
Silver-impregnated foam dressing applied under tracheostomy cannula. Dressings were changed when 75% saturated with secretions or left in place up to 7 days if dry.
Time frame: 30 days postoperatively
Measure DescriptionOverall rate of peristomal complications including infection, pressure ulcer, granulation tissue, and skin necrosis. Measured as percentage of patients developing any complication.
Time frame: Postoperative days 1, 7, 14, and 21
Measure DescriptionPressure ulcer risk assessment using Braden Q Scale (score range 7-28). Lower scores indicate higher risk: ≤12 high risk, 13-15 moderate risk, ≥16 no risk.
Time frame: 30 days postoperatively
Measure DescriptionPressure ulcer staging according to National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel (NPIAP) classification system: Stage 1 (non-blanchable erythema), Stage 2 (partial-thickness skin loss), Stage 3 (full-thickness skin loss), Stage 4 (full-thickness tissue loss).
Acibadem Atasehir Hospital
Other
Comparison of Foam Dressing Versus Silver-Impregnated Foam Dressing for Prevention of Peristomal Complications in Pediatric Tracheostomy: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Using Validated Assessment Tools
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05845775
Tracheostomy Complication
Antalya, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06002178
Respiratory Tract Diseases, Trachea
Padova, Veneto, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT05595707
Respiration Disorders, Respiratory Failure
Amman, Jordan
View Trial DetailsNCT05499273
Anesthesia, Tracheostomy Complication
Bern, Switzerland
View Trial Details