We will examine the effectiveness of a high-intensity functional training (HIFT) exercise intervention compared to Army Physical Readiness Training (APRT) and their related dietary instructions in improving body composition (percent body fat [%BF], fat mass, lean body mass, weight) and domains of Total Force Fitness (TFF; Army Physical Fitness Test [APFT], aerobic capacity, power, strength, and combat preparation and readiness) in a 6-month cluster-randomized clinical trial (CRCT) with 2 (+/- 1) month follow-up. We also will examine the effects of both exercise programs on cardiovascular disease (CVD) health risk (resting heart rate, blood pressure). We will conduct assessments at baseline, 6-months, and 2-month follow-up (+/- 1 month). We also will assess training time/volume, injuries, adverse events, adherence, and participant satisfaction and account for demographic and psychosocial variables.
In our CRCT, we aim to recruit and randomize approximately 150 soldiers (n=15 clusters-staff groups/platoons-per condition with at least 5 soldiers nested within each cluster) comparing the effectiveness of HIFT versus usual care (APRT) on:
Specific Aim 1 - changes in body composition including: percent body fat (%BF), fat mass, fat free mass, and body weight.
We hypothesize that soldiers in the HIFT condition will be significantly more likely to decrease a. %BF and b. fat mass, and to increase c. fat free mass than those in the APRT condition; we expect both groups to d. maintain body weight.
Specific Aim 2 - changes in fitness (e.g., APFT, power, strength), while accounting for actual physical training time in each condition.
We hypothesize that soldiers in the HIFT condition will have significantly greater improvement in their performance on fitness tests when compared to those in APRT, despite significantly less total training time. These outcomes will help determine if functional-oriented training can result in better fitness and combat preparedness for Army personnel.
