Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05986708

Application of Guided Self- Determination (GSD) Method in Hemodialysis Patients

The aim of this study is to assess how guided self-determination method affects adherence to treatment, fluid control, self-efficacy, anxiety level and quality of life in hemodialysis patients.

The population of the study consisted of patients who received HD treatment at Private Eskişehir Anatolian Dialysis Center and Eskişehir Osmangazi University Health, Practice and Research Hospital Dialysis Unit between April 2022 and October 2022. The sample of the study was 65 patients who met the inclusion criteria in the specified population.

Individual Identification Form, Biological/Biochemical Data Form, End Stage Renal Failure Compliance Scale, Hemodialysis Patients Fluid Control Scale, General Self-Efficacy Scale, Beck Anxiety Scale and SF-36 Quality of Life Scale Short Form were used to collect research data.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–70 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Eskişehir Osmangazi University Faculty of Health Sciences

Eskişehir, 26480, Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Guided Self- Determination (GSD) is a self-management support intervention aimed at supporting decision making and problem solving and helping patients suffering from a chronic disease to improve their life skills. GSD aims to support and develop the self management ability of the patients' chronic illness according to their own needs and desires by sharing psychosocial aspects, enabling active involvement of the patient in goal setting and treatment decisions, and thus developing positive autonomy and responsibility in the patient. This method is based on the idea that there is a potential for change in the patient-nurse relationship to support mutual understanding and cooperation.

This method consists of interviews using structured self-evaluation forms based on theories. It aims to guide the patient to gain skills for self-determination and self management by using these self-evaluation forms in thinking, goal setting, and problem solving .The self-assessment forms include four themes: the patient-healthcare professional relationship, illness and life, the relationship between ideal and reality, and working for change. The aim is to guide patients and healthcare professionals through mutual thinking using a six-step interaction process. These six stages are (i) establishing a clear mutual patient-nurse relationship (ii) self-discovery, (iii) self-understanding, (iv) shared decision making, (v) action, and (vi) feedback from action. In each interview, the patient fills out the self-evaluation forms in advance to encourage sharing before and during the interview with the nurses.

In our study, there are 2 groups; intervention and control groups. In addition to routine treatment and care, the patients in the intervention group were interviewed by the researcher once a week for 6 weeks, with a total of 6 sessions of directed self-determination, each session being approximately 30 min-1 hour before HD treatment. The interview time was determined in consultation with the patients, and when the patient forgot/missed an interview, he was offered an appointment for another interview if he wanted to continue the study. Evaluations of the patients in both groups was performed with biological and/or biochemical data, ESRD-SQ, General Self-Efficacy Scale, HHSSK, SF-36 Quality of Life Scale Short Form and the Beck Anxiety Scale at the end of the interviews (week 6) and week 18, conducted within the scope of guided self-determination method.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Between the ages of 18-70,
  • Literate,
  • Having end-stage renal failure,
  • Receiving HD treatment,
  • Able to communicate in Turkish,
  • No hearing or vision loss,
  • Conscious Open,
  • Patients who volunteer to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

  • End-stage renal failure hospitalized due to emergency,
  • Receiving HD treatment for a reason other than end-stage renal disease,

Treatment and study plan

interview

Other

In addition to routine treatment and care, the patients in the application group were interviewed by the researcher once a week for 6 weeks, within the first hour of HD treatment, for a total of 6 sessions, each session being approximately 30 minutes-1 hour, within the scope of the guided self-determination method.

Primary outcomes

  1. The change in treatment adherence in hemodialysis patients

    Time frame: week 0, week 6, and week 18 of the study

    Treatment adherence was evaluated in study with the End Stage Kidney Disease Adherence Scale (ESRD-AQ) .The End Stage Kidney Disease Adherence Scale evaluates patients' participation in hemodialysis treatment, their medication use, their adherence with fluid restriction and diet.

    The validity and reliability analysis of the scale was made on 9 items. The total score that can be obtained from the scale varies between 0-1200. As the score obtained from the scale increases, the level of adherence to treatment increases.

  2. The change in fluid control in hemordialysis patients

    Time frame: week 0, week 6, and week 18 of the study

    Fluid control was evaluated with "Fluid Control in Hemodialysis Patients Scale". This scale has a total of 24 items and three sub-dimensions. Information sub-dimension: 1.-7. from questions; behavior sub-dimension 8.-18. From the questions; attitude sub-dimension 19.-24. consists of questions. The lowest score obtained from the scale is 24, the highest score is 72, and as the score increases, patients' compliance with fluid control increases.

  3. The change in self-efficancy in hemodialysis patients

    Time frame: week 0, week 6, and week 18 of the study

    Self-efficancy was evaluated at 0th week, 6th weeks and 18th weeks in study with General Self-Efficancy Scale".This scale has a total of 24 items. Each of the 10 items in the scale receives scores ranging from 1 to 4. The lowest score obtained from the scale is evaluated as 10 and the highest score as 40, and as the scale score increases, the self-efficacy score increases.

  4. The change in quality of life in hemodialysis patients

    Time frame: week 0, week 6, and week 18 of the study

    The change in quality of life in hemodialysis patients was evaluated with the Short Form of the Quality of Life Scale (SF 36). The scale consists of 36 questions and the last four weeks of the individuals are questioned. The scale consists of eight sub-dimensions and the sub-dimensions is evaluated separately. On the scale, "0" indicates poor health, "100" indicates good health.

  5. The change in anxiety level in hemodialysis patients

    Time frame: week 0, week 6, and week 18 of the study

    Anxiety level was evaluated with Beck Anxiety Inventory. It is a self-assessment scale consisting of 21 items and scored between 0-3. With the questions asked to the person, it is questioned to what extent the feeling of distress has disturbed him in the last week. Scores from the scale range from 0 to 63, with 8-15 points = mild anxiety, 16-25 points = moderate anxiety, 26-63 points = severe anxiety.

Secondary outcomes

  1. The change in intradialytic weight (kg) in hemodialysis patients

    Time frame: week 0, week 6, and week 18 of the study

    Interdialytic weight was measured by the weight difference between two hemodialysis sessions.

  2. The change in serum potassium (mEq/L) value in hemodialysis patients

    Time frame: week 0, week 6, and week 18 of the study

    Serum potassium value was taken from the patient file. Normal serum potassium is 3.5 to 5.5 mEq/L.

  3. The change in serum phosphorus (mmol/L) value in hemodialysis patients

    Time frame: week 0, week 6, and week 18 of the study

    Serum phosphorus value was taken from the patient file. Normal serum phosphorus value is 3.5 to 5.5 mmol/L.

  4. The change in serum calcium (mg/dl) in hemodialysis patients

    Time frame: week 0, week 6, and week 18 of the study

    Serum calcium value was taken from the patient file. Normal serum calcium value is 8.6 to 10.0 mg/dl.

  5. The change in serum albumin (g/dl) in hemodialysis patients

    Time frame: week 0, week 6, and week 18 of the study

    Serum calcium value was taken from the patient file. Normal serum albumin value is 3.4 to 4.8 g/dl.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Eskisehir Osmangazi University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

The Effect of Guided Self-Determination (GSD) Method on Treatment Adherence, Fluid Control, Self-Efficancy, Anxiety and Quality of Life in Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2022
Study completion
2022
First posted
Aug 14, 2023
Registry last updated
Aug 14, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.