Marmara University Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Endodontics
Istanbul, 34854, Turkey (Türkiye)
NCT Number: NCT07466433
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether the size of apical preparation affects the success of regenerative endodontic treatment in mature permanent teeth with apical periodontitis. Regenerative endodontic treatment is a procedure that aims to eliminate infection and support healing of the tissues around the root of the tooth.
The main questions the study aims to answer are:
* Does a larger apical preparation improve healing around the root tip? * Does apical preparation size affect pain after treatment or recovery of tooth vitality?
Researchers compared two treatment approaches that use different apical preparation sizes to see if one leads to better clinical and radiographic healing.
Participants:
* Received regenerative endodontic treatment with one of two apical preparation sizes * Attended follow-up visits for clinical examination and radiographic evaluation * Were monitored for pain and healing outcomes during the follow-up period
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–45 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Istanbul, 34854, Turkey (Türkiye)
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Regenerative endodontic treatment (RET) is a biologically based procedure that includes root canal disinfection followed by placement of a biological scaffold to support tissue regeneration and periapical healing. In this study, the intervention differs according to the apical preparation size used (ISO 40 and ISO 80) in mature teeth with apical periodontitis.
Time frame: 6 months and 12 months
Primer success is evaluated based on the absence of clinical symptoms and radiographic healing of the periapical lesion.
Time frame: 6 months and 12 months
Secondary success was defined as the recovery of pulp sensibility, evaluated using cold and electric pulp tests during follow-up examinations.
Time frame: baseline, day 1, day 2, and day 7 after treatment
Postoperative pain was evaluated using a visual analogue scale.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Changes in the periapical lesion area were measured using digital radiographic analysis.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Bone density changes in the periapical region were evaluated using mean gray value measurements obtained from digital radiographs.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Changes in trabecular bone microarchitecture in the periapical region were evaluated using fractal dimension analysis.
Marmara University
Other
The Effect of Apical Preperation Size on the Success of Regenerative Endodontic Treatment in Mature Teeth With Apical Periodontitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06886438
Apical Periodontitis, Dental Pulp Diseases
Ankara, Etlik, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07722416
Apical Periodontitis, Dental Pulp Diseases
Kayseri, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07700394
Apical Periodontitis, Jaw Diseases
Cairo, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT07689838
Apical Periodontitis, Dental Caries
Riyadh, Riyadh Region, Saudi Arabia
View Trial Details