University of Miami Health System
Miami, Florida, 33132, United States
NCT Number: NCT07322289
The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether the use of antibiotic-coated (triclosan) braided sutures is non-inferior or potentially superior to standard monofilament sutures in patients with prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) managed with the DAIR protocol. Several studies in various surgical specialties have demonstrated the effectiveness and non-inferiority of triclosan-coated braided sutures in infected surgical cases, and the study intends to transpose this idea to the management of prosthetic joint infections. Monofilament sutures are the present standard of care in any infected joint case due their lower surface area for bacterial harborization, though surgeons sacrifice mechanical integrity and comfortability with the closure in the process. By demonstrating the safety of antibiotic -coated braided sutures, surgeons will no longer have to make this compromise.
Trial opening soon.
Get Notified18 year–89 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Miami, Florida, 33132, United States
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Acute Prosthetic Joint Infection: <4 weeks since it was suspected/diagnosed
Exclusion criteria
neutropenia, HIV, steroid use
Synthetic, absorbable, braided suture coated with triclosan for antimicrobial protection. Used for fascial and skin closure. Offers high tensile strength and knot security
Absorbable, non-braided suture. Used for fascial and skin closure.
Time frame: 90 days post treatment
Treatment failure is defined by Musculoskeletal Infection Society Criteria for prosthetic joint infection, including persistent wound drainage, sinus tract formation, positive cultures, or need for surgical revision.The proportion will be calculated as the number of patients meeting any MSIS treatment-failure criterion divided by the total number of patients evaluated. Assessment will be based on clinical evaluation and microbiological data collected at 90 days post-treatment.
Time frame: Within 90 days of surgery
A cost analysis will be conducted to compare the net expenses associated with the use of triclosan-coated braided absorbable sutures versus monofilament absorbable sutures for fascial and skin closure. The analysis will include direct material costs, operative time, and any postoperative complications requiring additional interventions.
Time frame: Up to 90 days post-operative
Medical records will be reviewed for any documented wound dehiscence following surgery
Time frame: Up to 90 days post-operative
Medical records will be reviewed for any documented superficial surgical site infection
Time frame: Up to 90 days post-operative
Medical records will be reviewed for any documented seroma formation following surgery
Time frame: Up to 90 days post-operative
Medical records will be reviewed for any documented delayed wound healing
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
University of Miami
Other
Evaluating the Use of Antibiotic-Coated Braided Sutures in Debridement, Antibiotic, and Implant Retention (DAIR) Procedures
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07426471
Arthritis, Arthritis, Infectious
View Trial DetailsNCT07409402
Prosthetic Joint Infection
Paris, France
View Trial DetailsNCT06591741
Prosthetic Joint Infection
View Trial DetailsNCT05169229
Antibiotic Resistant Infection, Arthritis
Linköping, Region Östergotland, Sweden
View Trial Details