SWPS University
Warsaw, Masovian Voivodeship, 03-815, Poland
NCT Number: NCT07165977
The goal of this study is to explore the potential impact of an anti-inflammatory probiotic mixture of psychobiotics including Bifidobacterium longum Rosell®-175 and Lactobacillus helveticus Rosell®-52 on cognitive functions in older adults following either pro-inflammatory or anti-inflammatory diets. According to recent findings, even short-term exposure to foods with pro- or anti-inflammatory properties may lead to corresponding negative or beneficial effects on cognitive functioning .
The main questions this study aims to answer are:
* How important is the initial dietary pattern for observing possible beneficial effects of probiotic supplementation? (Diet as a potential moderator) * How important is the initial state of the gut microbiota for observing possible beneficial effects of probiotic supplementation? (Microbiota as a potential moderator) * Is it possible to improve or slow down the decline in cognitive functions associated with aging with probiotic supplementation? * Can probiotic supplementation counteract the negative effects of pro-inflammatory dietary patterns?
The investigators will compare probiotic to a placebo (a look-alike substance that contains no active ingredients) to determine whether probiotic is effective in enhancing cognitive function.
Participants:
* Take a probiotic or placebo capsule daily for 3 months * Undergo a crossover after 3 months - those who initially took probiotics will switch to the placebo, and vice versa * Visit SWPS University for screening (T0), baseline assessments before beginning supplementation (T1), and follow-up assessments at 3 months (T2) and 6 months (T3). The T2 visit occurs just before the crossover. * Complete neuropsychological testing, questionnaires, and EEG recordings during the T1, T2, and T3 visits. * Provide stool samples for gut microbiota analysis at the T1, T2, and T3 visits. * Maintain their usual dietary habits throughout the study.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
50 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Warsaw, Masovian Voivodeship, 03-815, Poland
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Each participant will take a probiotic mixture containing Bifidobacterium longum Rosell®-175 & Lactobacillus helveticus Rosell®-52 and excipients: potato starch, magnesium stearate, and the capsule shell of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose. (Sanprobi Stress; Sanprobi sp. z o.o., sp.k., Szczecin, Poland) for 3 months.
After completion of the first phase, each participant will take a probiotic containing only the excipients, i.e. maize starch, maltodextrins, and the capsule shell for another 3 months.
Each participant will take a probiotic containing only the excipients, i.e. maize starch, maltodextrins, and the capsule shell for 3 months.
After completion of the first phase, each participant will take a probiotic mixture containing Bifidobacterium longum Rosell®-175 & Lactobacillus helveticus Rosell®-52 and excipients: potato starch, magnesium stearate, and the capsule shell of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose. (Sanprobi Stress; Sanprobi sp. z o.o., sp.k., Szczecin, Poland) for another 3 months.
Time frame: Baseline (prior to intervention), at the end of the 3-month probiotic/placebo supplementation period, and again 3 months after the crossover.
California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT) measure the verbal learning and memory. It measures how well individuals learn and recall verbal material, assessing both short-term and long-term memory. The Differentiation score measures the ability to distinguish between correct and incorrect responses. Scores range from 0 to 16, with higher scores indicating better outcome.
Time frame: Baseline (prior to intervention), at the end of the 3-month probiotic/placebo supplementation period, and again 3 months after the crossover.
The old/new word recognition task is designed to assess episodic memory. It is consisted of two phases: a learning phase and a recognition phase. During the learning phase, participants viewed 30 pictures on the computer. In the recognition phase, participants were presented with 30 "old" and 30 "new" pictures in random order and were asked to determine whether each picture had been shown during the learning phase.
To analyze episodic memory task we followed Macmillan and Creelman (2005) signal detection theory, where d' is the ability to discriminate between signal and noise (between old and new stimuli), H stands for the proportion of correct changes detected (hit rate), and F stands for the proportion of changes incorrectly reported (false alarm rate).
d' = zH - zF
Time frame: Baseline (prior to intervention), at the end of the 3-month probiotic/placebo supplementation period, and again 3 months after the crossover.
The N400 ERP component will be measured during an old/new word recognition task designed to assess episodic memory. The task involves presenting participants with previously studied ("old") and novel ("new") words while EEG is recorded. The N400 component-typically observed as a negative deflection peaking around 400 ms post-stimulus-is sensitive to familiarity and memory retrieval. A reduced N400 amplitude for old versus new words is interpreted as successful recognition. Changes in N400 amplitude over time will indicate modulation of episodic memory performance across the intervention.
Time frame: Baseline (prior to intervention), at the end of the 3-month probiotic/placebo supplementation period, and again 3 months after the crossover.
Scores range from 0 to 63, with higher scores indicating more severe depressive symptoms.
Time frame: Baseline (prior to intervention), at the end of the 3-month probiotic/placebo supplementation period, and again 3 months after the crossover.
Scores range from 10 to 50, with higher scores indicating greater fatigue.
Time frame: Baseline (prior to intervention), at the end of the 3-month probiotic/placebo supplementation period, and again 3 months after the crossover.
Scores range from 0 to 308, with higher scores indicating better outcome.
Time frame: Baseline (prior to intervention), at the end of the 3-month probiotic/placebo supplementation period, and again 3 months after the crossover.
Scores range from 0 to 308, with higher scores indicating better outcome.
Time frame: Baseline (prior to intervention), at the end of the 3-month probiotic/placebo supplementation period, and again 3 months after the crossover.
Scores range from 0 to 39, with higher scores indicating better outcome.
Time frame: Baseline (prior to intervention), at the end of the 3-month probiotic/placebo supplementation period, and again 3 months after the crossover.
Scores range from 0 to 14, with higher scores indicating better outcome.
Time frame: Baseline (prior to intervention), at the end of the 3-month probiotic/placebo supplementation period, and again 3 months after the crossover.
Scores range from 0 to 14, with higher scores indicating better outcome.
Time frame: Baseline (prior to intervention), at the end of the 3-month probiotic/placebo supplementation period, and again 3 months after the crossover.
Scores range from 0 to 54, with higher scores indicating better outcome.
Time frame: Baseline (prior to intervention), at the end of the 3-month probiotic/placebo supplementation period, and again 3 months after the crossover.
There is no predefined maximum number of errors in the test.
Time frame: Baseline (prior to intervention), at the end of the 3-month probiotic/placebo supplementation period, and again 3 months after the crossover.
There is no predefined maximum number of errors in the test.
Time frame: Baseline (prior to intervention), at the end of the 3-month probiotic/placebo supplementation period, and again 3 months after the crossover.
A maximum time limit of 240 seconds (4 minutes) is applied.
Time frame: Baseline (prior to intervention), at the end of the 3-month probiotic/placebo supplementation period, and again 3 months after the crossover.
A maximum time limit of 240 seconds (4 minutes) is applied.
Time frame: Baseline (prior to intervention), at the end of the 3-month probiotic/placebo supplementation period, and again 3 months after the crossover.
Time frame: Baseline (prior to intervention), at the end of the 3-month probiotic/placebo supplementation period, and again 3 months after the crossover.
Time frame: Baseline (prior to intervention), at the end of the 3-month probiotic/placebo supplementation period, and again 3 months after the crossover.
Time frame: Baseline (prior to intervention), at the end of the 3-month probiotic/placebo supplementation period, and again 3 months after the crossover.
Time frame: Baseline (prior to intervention), at the end of the 3-month probiotic/placebo supplementation period, and again 3 months after the crossover.
Time frame: Baseline (prior to intervention)
Dietary Inflammatory Index assessment based on the Shivappa et al. (2014) equation. It classifies participants' dietary patterns as pro-inflammatory, neutral, or anti-inflammatory. Scores ranged from -8.87 (maximally anti-inflammatory diet) to +7.98 (maximally pro-inflammatory diet).
Time frame: Baseline (prior to intervention)
A screening tool for cognitive impairment with older adults. It is scored on a scale from 0 to 30.
27-30 points: Normal result, no cognitive impairment 24-26 points: Cognitive impairment without dementia 19-23 points: Mild dementia 11-18 points: Moderate dementia 0-10 points: Severe dementia
Time frame: Baseline (prior to intervention)
The Raven's Progressive Matrices test is used to measure the level of general intelligence, understood as fluid intelligence. It is scored on a scale from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating better outcome.
Time frame: Baseline (prior to intervention)
The scale ranges from 0 to 7, with higher scores reflecting greater adherence to the Mediterranean diet.
University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Warsaw
Other
The Impact of an Anti-inflammatory Probiotic Supplementation on Cognitive Functioning in the Elderly Population - the Moderating Role of the Dietary Patterns and Gut Microbiota
Acronym: CoProM
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06933095
Cognition Disorders, Cognitive Decline
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03331796
Cognition Disorders, Cognitive Decline
Palo Alto, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06866327
Cognition Disorders, Cognitive Dysfunction
Rochester, New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07218120
Healthy Subjects, Memory Decline
Chula Vista, California, United States
View Trial Details